Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
This will also get thrown out still_one Oct 2012 #1
NO "Stand your Ground" laws here thank goodness. But this is crazy. SleeplessinSoCal Oct 2012 #2
Actually, California has been SYG since gejohnston Oct 2012 #4
Well played, good sir. Well played. rDigital Oct 2012 #8
Guess I'm moving back to NYC. SleeplessinSoCal Oct 2012 #10
unless you plan on violently attacking an armed person gejohnston Oct 2012 #17
Cool CokeMachine Oct 2012 #18
and here I was pulling for SF because I was in SF last week for 4 days and caught the fever. SleeplessinSoCal Oct 2012 #19
Two down -- Two to go!!! CokeMachine Oct 2012 #20
What a horrible story! I hope they throw the burglar in jail and the suit out of court. hrmjustin Oct 2012 #3
His lawyer should be disbarred. Scuba Oct 2012 #5
Why, he is just doing the job he is being paid for. oneshooter Oct 2012 #6
Frivolous lawsuits are a waste of the court's time. Scuba Oct 2012 #7
I never said they weren't. He is just doing the job he was paid for. oneshooter Oct 2012 #9
There's a valuable lesson here ... holdencaufield Oct 2012 #11
Actually, the lesson is the accuracy of shots matters. ManiacJoe Oct 2012 #12
You know how you get to Carnegie Hall, don't you? holdencaufield Oct 2012 #13
he was running for cover in order to take up a better tactical position from which to shoot at me trouble.smith Oct 2012 #14
Motion to dismiss: Castle Doctrine no_hypocrisy Oct 2012 #15
does a 90yo really need to live longer? poor innocent man was only there for stuff. ileus Oct 2012 #16
This here old timer... discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2012 #21
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Burglar shot 90 yr old re...»Reply #13