Gun Control & RKBA

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)

14. because Mitt does too

Wed Oct 17, 2012, 11:32 PM

Oct 2012

and he signed one. You missed that? A lot of folks in Montana didn't know that, but do now. Mitt won't be getting their vote either or vote for Obama for other reasons. I actually think it hurt Mitt more than Obama.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Mitt Romney: I Like it When Both the Pro-Gun and Anti-Gun Sides Come Together [View all] LAGC Oct 2012 OP

"Pro-Gun and Anti-Gun sides" is a mechanistic and illogical approach to public policy... Eleanors38 Oct 2012 #1

He's living in some kind of fanatasy world slackmaster Oct 2012 #2

The Second Amendment is about militia service. n/t ellisonz Oct 2012 #3

the hell it is. nt trouble.smith Oct 2012 #4

How very patriotic. n/t ellisonz Oct 2012 #5

whatever you say buddy. trouble.smith Oct 2012 #17

You can quit beating that dead horse. GreenStormCloud Oct 2012 #6

"collectivist" - is that like socialist? ellisonz Oct 2012 #7

not at all the same thing gejohnston Oct 2012 #8

A blog post? ellisonz Oct 2012 #9

it was the first result that came up gejohnston Oct 2012 #10

Glad to see you base your arguments on "the first result that came up" ellisonz Oct 2012 #11

the point was simply to explain what gejohnston Oct 2012 #12

lol ellisonz Oct 2012 #13

because Mitt does too gejohnston Oct 2012 #14

Even an Obama victory won't bring that dead horse back to life. GreenStormCloud Oct 2012 #18

Like the court says in it's majority opinions... safeinOhio Oct 2012 #19

Requiring militia service is NOT one of those restrictions. GreenStormCloud Oct 2012 #20

Other than owning a gun in the home, safeinOhio Oct 2012 #28

Everything else is still to be decided by legislation and litigation. N/T GreenStormCloud Oct 2012 #33

The Second Amendment is about the people keeping and bearing arms. aikoaiko Oct 2012 #15

This message was self-deleted by its author safeinOhio Oct 2012 #29

That is correct. Atypical Liberal Oct 2012 #23

However, this does not usurp the clear intent of the Constitution... ellisonz Oct 2012 #24

but the empirical evidence shows gejohnston Oct 2012 #25

However, you cannot infringe on the second amendment to provide for the public safety. Atypical Liberal Oct 2012 #26

So how do you reconcile keeping militia-useful weapons with public safety? Atypical Liberal Oct 2012 #27

You could keep your assault weapons at the armory... ellisonz Oct 2012 #30

Unacceptable on practical, historical, and political grounds. friendly_iconoclast Oct 2012 #31

a true assault weapon gejohnston Oct 2012 #32

If the government is keeping them this is not the same as The People keeping them. Atypical Liberal Oct 2012 #34

If you wish to alter or re-tool the second amendment, there is a process to do so AtheistCrusader May 2013 #38

If that's what keeps you warm and fuzzy at night glacierbay Oct 2012 #35

The Supreme Court seems to disagree with you. Jim Levy May 2013 #37

Post removed Post removed Oct 2012 #16

Obama and Romney vie for 'Salesman of the Decade' Francis Marion Oct 2012 #21

"I Like it When Both the Pro-Gun and Anti-Gun Sides Come Together" - So I can ban assault rifles. Atypical Liberal Oct 2012 #22

He can't own it. AtheistCrusader May 2013 #39

Message auto-removed Name removed May 2013 #36

The gun has long been a symbol linerpe Jul 2013 #40