Reply #28

In the discussion thread: So for the anti-gunners, what is wrong with Bill Clinton's analysis? [View all]

Response to 1GirlieGirl (Reply #15)

Sun Sep 2, 2012, 11:19 PM

PavePusher (15,374 posts)

28. If by "nasty tone" you mean truth and uncomfortable facts, then yeah, maybe so.

But the problem then is not that of the other poster.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

59 replies	Author	Time	Post
So for the anti-gunners, what is wrong with Bill Clinton's analysis? [View all]	AnotherMcIntosh	Sep 2012	OP
Who needs Congress? Executive order and some good judges can do what's necessary.	Loudly	Sep 2012	#1
Consequences will be the same	Reasonable_Argument	Sep 2012	#2
so how would you vote? . . . who would you send your $$$ to? . . . who would you make calls for?	DrDan	Sep 2012	#3
how would you label Jerry Brown?	gejohnston	Sep 2012	#6
Well	Reasonable_Argument	Sep 2012	#7
Voters can't do shit about what judges want.	ileus	Sep 2012	#21
Sorry	glacierbay	Sep 2012	#4
Because some people are using high-capacity...	Deep13	Sep 2012	#5
Ditto	1GirlieGirl	Sep 2012	#8
Well	Reasonable_Argument	Sep 2012	#9
Always with the nasty tone	1GirlieGirl	Sep 2012	#15
I am trying to understand but, I am sorry - I do not see the nasty tone in that post	Tuesday Afternoon	Sep 2012	#17
Perhaps a more civil tone here...	MercutioATC	Sep 2012	#19
Thank you. That was very pretty.	1GirlieGirl	Sep 2012	#20
You	RegieRocker	Sep 2012	#42
Yes, that's correct	1GirlieGirl	Sep 2012	#43
And I am impressed. Don't let us put you off here in the gun forum,	TPaine7	Sep 2012	#44
Is Reasonable Argument a member of the NRA?	Marengo	Sep 2012	#25
If by "nasty tone" you mean truth and uncomfortable facts, then yeah, maybe so.	PavePusher	Sep 2012	#28
assault rifles have been tightly regulated and registered since the 1930s	gejohnston	Sep 2012	#12
You mean rifles like this one?	oneshooter	Sep 2012	#22
I'm thinking of the 34-rd. Glock magazines...	Deep13	Sep 2012	#23
What is the difference between those and the one shown?	oneshooter	Sep 2012	#24
I'm guessing 10-20 rounds. nt	Deep13	Sep 2012	#35
So it is ONLY the ammunition capacity that you care about?	oneshooter	Sep 2012	#48
Mostly, and concealability.	Deep13	Sep 2012	#50
The "regulation" you refer to is related to the militia, not the people when outside the militia.	PavePusher	Sep 2012	#52
The "people's right" is the right to insure regulated, state security.	Deep13	Sep 2012	#55
Take a look at what actually happened in real life.	GreenStormCloud	Sep 2012	#53
Why Glock?	gejohnston	Sep 2012	#26
You mean the Five-Seven?	Deep13	Sep 2012	#34
You can get 30 round mags for the five seven	gejohnston	Sep 2012	#36
I've got 20-rounders for my Beretta carbine.	Deep13	Sep 2012	#40
I believe the long magazines were built for the full-auto Glock 18	krispos42	Sep 2012	#45
They're great in the G19 at the range.	MercutioATC	Sep 2012	#57
Collapsible stocks? They only shorten the weapon by 4.72 inches on an M4 type rifle. That's not	rDigital	Sep 2012	#27
I know it's not the manufacturer's purpose.	Deep13	Sep 2012	#30
he didn't use an AK	gejohnston	Sep 2012	#32
I see.	Deep13	Sep 2012	#41
The Batman shooter used an M&P-15 (AR-15), a Remington 870 shotgun and a Glock 22. No AK in sight.	rDigital	Sep 2012	#37
"collapsible, concealable stocks"	PavePusher	Sep 2012	#29
I realize the buffer tube limits the collapsability	Deep13	Sep 2012	#31
with a 14 inch barrel,	gejohnston	Sep 2012	#33
A fixed flash-suppresor counts as part of the barrel length. (welded or pinned)	PavePusher	Sep 2012	#39
Sigh.	PavePusher	Sep 2012	#38
Some people are also using fertilizer and fuel oil to commit mass murder.	MercutioATC	Sep 2012	#58
John Kasich proved you wrong.	safeinOhio	Sep 2012	#10
This was discussed in another post	Reasonable_Argument	Sep 2012	#11
All the excuses in the world do not	safeinOhio	Sep 2012	#14
McCain was never all that popular with gun owners. ...	spin	Sep 2012	#54
How much was due to high tech ballot stuffing?	gejohnston	Sep 2012	#13
Clinton's anti-gun stance was enough for me to not vote for him!	Yavapai	Sep 2012	#16
it is the Democratic Party, has been since Jefferson's Democratic-Republicans	gejohnston	Sep 2012	#18
The Deadly Myth of Gun Control in Electoral Politics	SecularMotion	Sep 2012	#46
I agree with that analysis	Reasonable_Argument	Sep 2012	#47
So why, exactly, are you crusading for a revival of the 1993 issue?	AnotherMcIntosh	Sep 2012	#49
Yeah, let's just the NRA run the entire show.	MotherPetrie	Sep 2012	#51
Why do you equate private gun ownership with the NRA?	MercutioATC	Sep 2012	#56
You make a damn good point. ...	spin	Sep 2012	#59

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.