Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

DWC

(911 posts)

39. Well stated. n/t

Reply to ManiacJoe (Reply #3)

Wed Aug 22, 2012, 01:00 PM

Aug 2012

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

44 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Google Dumps Policy Proposal for the Gun Control & RKBA Group [View all] TPaine7 Aug 2012 OP

If a googler dumps something interesting we can discuss it with or without the OP's petronius Aug 2012 #1

I get your point, but I think allowing google dumps by folks who then run for the hills makes it TPaine7 Aug 2012 #2

If the OP does not find the article interesting enough to comment on it, ManiacJoe Aug 2012 #3

Well stated. n/t DWC Aug 2012 #39

RTFMS SecularMotion Aug 2012 #4

Yeah....you should read it. Clames Aug 2012 #5

It comes out from its cover... holdencaufield Aug 2012 #6

I've yet to find any thought-provoking discussions in the gungeon. SecularMotion Aug 2012 #9

Do you really want some serious discussion? TruthAnalyzed Aug 2012 #11

No Thanks SecularMotion Aug 2012 #14

You're not interested in discussion? TruthAnalyzed Aug 2012 #15

Your views are far to the right of myself and most of DU SecularMotion Aug 2012 #19

My 'Views'? TruthAnalyzed Aug 2012 #20

Would a study by the Department of Justice TruthAnalyzed Aug 2012 #21

Pardon me for interjecting... discntnt_irny_srcsm Aug 2012 #44

Your attitudes are the reason we coined the word "Proglodyte." Callisto32 Aug 2012 #37

BTW, I said no ad hominem... TruthAnalyzed Aug 2012 #16

"I'm not interested in reading any of your opinions." holdencaufield Aug 2012 #18

If you're not interested in discussion... Lizzie Poppet Aug 2012 #27

"I'm not interested in reading any of your opinions." Simo 1939_1940 Aug 2012 #31

What would be a "thought-provoking discussion{}" in your book? TPaine7 Aug 2012 #17

And what do you contribute... Clames Aug 2012 #24

"Thought-provoking discussions"?? MicaelS Aug 2012 #35

Exactly. DanTex Aug 2012 #36

So quoting bloggers is ok, as long as they oppose gun rights?! Why am I not surprised? n/t TPaine7 Aug 2012 #40

If you've "yet to find any thought-provoking discussions in the gungeon" Jenoch Aug 2012 #38

It seems clear to me that a person who doesn't want to engage in discussion TPaine7 Aug 2012 #41

"...who typically posts the opinions of others and leaves is intentionally disrupting..." Jenoch Aug 2012 #43

Here is a "Thought Provoking" discussion for you. DWC Aug 2012 #42

If it helps you to think that I, or anyone else here, is afraid of news TPaine7 Aug 2012 #13

I post legislative news regularly. GreenStormCloud Aug 2012 #29

Oops, I think you accidentally replied to a thread! nt Union Scribe Aug 2012 #34

Sounds like a call for censorship to me. Starboard Tack Aug 2012 #7

Go to GD and post your undying love for romney and see how that goes. 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #10

I support censorship, in principle and in practice, as do you TPaine7 Aug 2012 #12

Lack of original content on your Google dumps... Clames Aug 2012 #25

I don't have a problem with posting some article you found 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #8

I just don't care much either way. The anti-gun obsessed do this for awhile and then slink away. aikoaiko Aug 2012 #22

Google dumps without explanation rDigital Aug 2012 #23

You should replace "an agenda" with "a position" petronius Aug 2012 #28

I think we can all agree this thread needs more cowbell : ). nt rDigital Aug 2012 #30

+1 TruthAnalyzed Aug 2012 #32

I typically don't comment Reasonable_Argument Aug 2012 #26

Meh... Glassunion Aug 2012 #33