Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

TPaine7

(4,286 posts)
53. It would be so neat if your humor were intentional.
Mon Aug 13, 2012, 08:37 PM
Aug 2012
gejohnston (7,926 posts) 
43. not a straw arguement

because it is talking about an argument your side makes.


DanTex (1,679 posts) 
44. Wrong. I don't know anyone who argues that if you try to defend yourself with a gun,

your gun will be used against you every time, or that you will hit an innocent bystander every time, or that any other specific thing will happen every time.


You are attempting to expose an alleged logical error—a straw man argument. But gejohnston claimed that the OP wasn't a straw argument because it's talking about an argument your side actually makes.

But you claim that's wrong. Your argument is that YOU allegedly don't know anyone who argues that any specific thing will happen every time, and so gejohnston is wrong. And that, to you, is solid logic.

Unfortunately, your ironic humor is unintentional.

(I've seen categorical statements many times, but I won't be chasing any down. Believe what you will.)
Yes, one anecdote disproves "anti-gun facts" JoePhilly Aug 2012 #1
Forgive him bongbong Aug 2012 #2
Is your reading comprehension really that bad, or are you mocking antis TPaine7 Aug 2012 #4
LOL bongbong Aug 2012 #7
You have my condolences... TPaine7 Aug 2012 #13
more laughs bongbong Aug 2012 #18
You need a new play, bongbong HALO141 Aug 2012 #32
TP bongbong Aug 2012 #33
Not sure what you mean HALO141 Aug 2012 #35
Nice! bongbong Aug 2012 #36
Not my fault that you guys can't come up with anything new. HALO141 Aug 2012 #38
LOL! bongbong Aug 2012 #40
Ah. Nice to know my life hasn't been wasted. n/t HALO141 Aug 2012 #55
Onion Bread PavePusher Aug 2012 #51
I'd love to see one of those "categorical comments". Gotta link? Starboard Tack Aug 2012 #57
How about three? TPaine7 Aug 2012 #59
Congrats! You win. Starboard Tack Aug 2012 #62
Like these? TPaine7 Aug 2012 #64
Like fish in a barrel :) n/t X_Digger Aug 2012 #72
Reading is fundamental TPaine7 Aug 2012 #3
You have provided an anecdotal argument. pnwmom Aug 2012 #5
you have no evidence that what you think is the rule gejohnston Aug 2012 #10
Nor does it disprove the statistics that show unicorns prefer clover. TPaine7 Aug 2012 #11
Oh no, don't you get it? Starboard Tack Aug 2012 #58
Did you not read the OP or do you have a rule against letting facts affect your opinions? TPaine7 Aug 2012 #60
Right! Starboard Tack Aug 2012 #61
When I was a kid, the mother of my friend was killed when his father, a cop ... JoePhilly Aug 2012 #14
I haven't seen that claim. TPaine7 Aug 2012 #21
Yes, very safe, unless dropped, or handled by a kid who had access ... or JoePhilly Aug 2012 #24
modern guns at least well made ones gejohnston Aug 2012 #42
Very safe exept when used with people around. Starboard Tack Aug 2012 #63
Another anecdote, a guy I knew was showing off Daddy's gun, explaining JoePhilly Aug 2012 #16
I have never known anyone, of any persuasion, who claimed that gun accidents don't happen TPaine7 Aug 2012 #28
I'm told that guns protect your family more than they create a risk to your family ... JoePhilly Aug 2012 #30
You are introducing Cadillacs into a discussion of apples TPaine7 Aug 2012 #45
In both of your Jenoch Aug 2012 #65
Ding ding ding ... you win. JoePhilly Aug 2012 #66
Another anecdote ... I worked in a cemetery when I was a teen ... JoePhilly Aug 2012 #17
You'll be ignored bongbong Aug 2012 #20
Well, if I do get "ignored" ... I do hope that I get the "Welcome to my ignore list" response. JoePhilly Aug 2012 #23
Your comment wasn't ignored, though another one was. n/t TPaine7 Aug 2012 #25
You don't seem to know what "Ignored" means on DU. JoePhilly Aug 2012 #27
"Ignored" means the same thing here as it means anywhere else. TPaine7 Aug 2012 #29
I've never placed anyone on ignore either, what fun it that? JoePhilly Aug 2012 #31
Ignored? bongbong Aug 2012 #34
Suicide with a gun is possible. Have you seen anyone claim otherwise on DU? n/t TPaine7 Aug 2012 #22
Not only is it possible, its much much easier. Some might call it win win. JoePhilly Aug 2012 #26
none of those "anti gun facts" are actually based gejohnston Aug 2012 #6
Prove it bongbong Aug 2012 #8
I personally know of three anecdotal tales in which people with a carry permit ... spin Aug 2012 #41
And this is equally anecdotal ... 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2012 #9
The good guys don't always win, even when they perform flawlessly. TPaine7 Aug 2012 #19
Like most RoBBers this one was dumber than dirt. ileus Aug 2012 #12
Holding a long gun to somene's head isn't very smart. If they can get inside the length of the TPaine7 Aug 2012 #15
Robbers get tunnel vision too. GreenStormCloud Aug 2012 #37
LOL. Using anecdotal evidence to disprove straw arguments! DanTex Aug 2012 #39
not a straw arguement gejohnston Aug 2012 #43
Wrong. I don't know anyone who argues that if you try to defend yourself with a gun, DanTex Aug 2012 #44
the OP doesn't use the term "every time" gejohnston Aug 2012 #46
Yes, but if the term "every time" isn't implicitly included, then a single anecdote.. DanTex Aug 2012 #49
more so than you gejohnston Aug 2012 #50
It would be so neat if your humor were intentional. TPaine7 Aug 2012 #53
Oh, I get it! You are using anecdotal evidence to disprove categorical arguments that... DanTex Aug 2012 #54
It appears Bloomberg's Internet Army (BIA) is already at work on this thread. rDigital Aug 2012 #47
Bloomberg's Internet Army... i like! n/t TPaine7 Aug 2012 #48
Ho Hum. Rain Mcloud Aug 2012 #52
This gun served its intended purpose—it was used to shoot someone. Starboard Tack Aug 2012 #56
That person "needed shooting", so what's the problem? TPaine7 Aug 2012 #68
Excuse me? "That person "needed shooting", so what's the problem?" Starboard Tack Aug 2012 #69
Come on, Starboard Tack. TPaine7 Aug 2012 #70
They need to be deterred, definitely. Shooting anyone should be an absolute last resort. Starboard Tack Aug 2012 #71
Some people seem to assume all legal gun owners are incompetent rubes, but . . . 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #67
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»"If they have the dr...»Reply #53