Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Glaug-Eldare

(1,089 posts)
21. Maybe where you are it's $35, but not here
Wed Jun 27, 2012, 06:45 PM
Jun 2012

FFLs around here charge $75 and UP for simple transfers. Fortunately, we have the option of doing handgun/regulated firearms transfers through the state police for $10, but there's no telling where that option is or isn't available. Simply requiring everybody to go through an FFL means artificially driving up demand for the transfer service, which will drastically increase the rates and make safe, legal private sales impractical.

Wouldn't it be better for everybody to simply make NICS more accessible and require its use? That way, the ability to buy and sell is not contingent on the FFL transfer rates, and background checks are available for all firearms transactions. Private sellers will have the knowledge they need to comply with the law, and nothing to hide behind if they're caught violating it. Private purchasers would be screened the same way retail purchasers are, without having to pay a third party's outrageous fees. Police and prosecutors will be able to prosecute illegal sellers with greater certainty. FFLs still make money off of interstate transfers and sales. Who loses?

Not sure I agree... mvccd1000 Jun 2012 #1
The 10A US Constitution (Bill of Rights)... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2012 #8
Worthless article and worthless topic.... PavePusher Jun 2012 #2
No problem Meiko Jun 2012 #11
One thing people leave out when they describe the "loophole" Glaug-Eldare Jun 2012 #3
That's easy to solve. NewMoonTherian Jun 2012 #5
That's basically how MD does private handgun transfers Glaug-Eldare Jun 2012 #13
How can a federal law regulate intrastate commerce? hack89 Jun 2012 #4
Oh come now. You know better than that. NewMoonTherian Jun 2012 #6
Hell, look at Wickard v. Filburn Glaug-Eldare Jun 2012 #14
Good thing the president has more sense than to try this. nt hack89 Jun 2012 #17
How do they intend to enforce this? NewMoonTherian Jun 2012 #7
I don't know what this guy is spiking his kool-aid with... Clames Jun 2012 #9
Gun culture has been telling us there is no "loophole" (I guess because they use it or might). Hoyt Jun 2012 #10
It's not a loophole -- it's a prohibition. Glaug-Eldare Jun 2012 #15
Plenty do stick it in their pants. And, most sellers who don't check Back Ground just want cash. Hoyt Jun 2012 #18
"most sellers who don't check Back Ground" Glaug-Eldare Jun 2012 #19
All they have to do is go through FFL. It costs $35 or so. So pay it next time you sell a gun Hoyt Jun 2012 #20
Maybe where you are it's $35, but not here Glaug-Eldare Jun 2012 #21
The problem with letting anyone use NICS is that one can check on their neighbor. You might only Hoyt Jun 2012 #22
How about this: Glaug-Eldare Jun 2012 #23
It has been my opinion and will continue to be that ... spin Jun 2012 #12
There is only one way to close the "loophole - universal licensing. Atypical Liberal Jun 2012 #16
As a Virginia resadent, and political activist.. virginia mountainman Jun 2012 #24
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Law enforcement officials...»Reply #21