Reply #60

In the discussion thread: Amid ATF Fast And Furious Scandal, House Democrats Point To Weak Gun Laws [View all]

Response to OneTenthofOnePercent (Reply #58)

Thu Jun 21, 2012, 09:39 PM

DanTex (3,780 posts)

60. Round and round we go! OK, guys, I'm done trying to reason with y'all.

Only in the gungeon...

Always a good time!

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

66 replies	Author	Time	Post
Amid ATF Fast And Furious Scandal, House Democrats Point To Weak Gun Laws [View all]	SecularMotion	Jun 2012	OP
Weak gun laws or weak enforcement of gun laws?	Remmah2	Jun 2012	#1
+1	Glassunion	Jun 2012	#2
Great. Just what we need with November rapidly approaching.	Simo 1939_1940	Jun 2012	#3
Plus it feeds into the FNC conspiracy theory that F&F was an attempt	Lionessa	Jun 2012	#4
Definitely weak enforcement.	ManiacJoe	Jun 2012	#5
I sometimes wonder if weak enforcement is intentional?	Remmah2	Jun 2012	#6
I hate to think that this is a possibility ...	spin	Jun 2012	#65
What fucking good is "increasing the penalties"	MicaelS	Jun 2012	#7
It's just as good as adding a bunch of new laws	slackmaster	Jun 2012	#9
Gentlemen!	Nuclear Unicorn	Jun 2012	#41
Obviously, the gun laws were too weak to prevent the ATF from doing what it did.	AnotherMcIntosh	Jun 2012	#8
It is ALREADY illegal to traffic arms to mexico or anywhere else.	OneTenthofOnePercent	Jun 2012	#10
Sorry, your NRA talking points are wrong (again...).	DanTex	Jun 2012	#11
not exactly	gejohnston	Jun 2012	#12
Actually, there is no minimum sentence for lying and buying.	DanTex	Jun 2012	#17
had the intent to lie?	gejohnston	Jun 2012	#23
That's because one is specifically not needed.	Clames	Jun 2012	#13
The cluelessness...	DanTex	Jun 2012	#16
Like William Newell?	gejohnston	Jun 2012	#19
And Carlos Canillo, Lee Casa, William Forcelli...	DanTex	Jun 2012	#20
how would it be written?	gejohnston	Jun 2012	#22
Like this...	DanTex	Jun 2012	#24
outside of organizer and conspiracy	gejohnston	Jun 2012	#31
That law would not apply to intrastate manufactured firearms.	OneTenthofOnePercent	Jun 2012	#34
Of course, "easily rendered impotent"... LOL	DanTex	Jun 2012	#36
...infests the anti-gun/pro-gun-control extremist.	Clames	Jun 2012	#42
How in the world wouldn't ITAR cover people driving guns into mexico?	OneTenthofOnePercent	Jun 2012	#15
First, it's not just a question of whether something is illegal.	DanTex	Jun 2012	#18
because it is already the law	gejohnston	Jun 2012	#21
LAws don't "catch and prosecute" anyone.	PavePusher	Jun 2012	#25
Pay close attention now!	DanTex	Jun 2012	#27
For some, apparently. n/t	PavePusher	Jun 2012	#28
LOL, I think your word salad is a little ripe/stale...	OneTenthofOnePercent	Jun 2012	#26
add to that	gejohnston	Jun 2012	#32
Head in the sand...	DanTex	Jun 2012	#33
If an attorney (or AG) can't prosocute expressly illegal behaviour under clearly worded laws...	OneTenthofOnePercent	Jun 2012	#37
Except the simple laws have obviously not sufficed.	DanTex	Jun 2012	#38
I understand your argument, "The old laws don't or aren't working"...	OneTenthofOnePercent	Jun 2012	#39
Yes, I can be very specific.	DanTex	Jun 2012	#40
That PDF is not a bad start.	ManiacJoe	Jun 2012	#43
The 1968 GCA expressly forbids nonlicensed civilians from exporting/importing firearms	OneTenthofOnePercent	Jun 2012	#44
In other words, you were wrong: there is no law explicitly against gun trafficking.	DanTex	Jun 2012	#46
Then let them have their redundant law.	OneTenthofOnePercent	Jun 2012	#50
Also, just to be clear, I don't find that proposed legislation to be lacking or bad.	OneTenthofOnePercent	Jun 2012	#45
If a bunch of people regulating Wall Street banks were to say...	DanTex	Jun 2012	#47
Apples to oranges.	OneTenthofOnePercent	Jun 2012	#49
Only because you are in favor of one right-wing industry lobby and not the other.	DanTex	Jun 2012	#51
So, why no federal prosecuters?	gejohnston	Jun 2012	#52
No proof of YOUR claims? That's what I thought.	OneTenthofOnePercent	Jun 2012	#53
For the 50th time...	DanTex	Jun 2012	#55
and once again, the GCA deals with	gejohnston	Jun 2012	#56
And once again, not it doesn't, as evidenced by the inability of anyone to...	DanTex	Jun 2012	#57
we have.	gejohnston	Jun 2012	#59
Go read the 18 USC § 922... I promise you it's already illegal.	OneTenthofOnePercent	Jun 2012	#58
Round and round we go! OK, guys, I'm done trying to reason with y'all.	DanTex	Jun 2012	#60
come with an open mind next time while we explain	gejohnston	Jun 2012	#61
Mighty rich ...	Straw Man	Jun 2012	#62
I just noticed something	gejohnston	Jun 2012	#64
Isnt the prohibited end user at the heart of the Malone bill too?	aikoaiko	Jun 2012	#54
The law makes it damned difficult to even legally export to a "friendly" country.	oneshooter	Jun 2012	#48
Yep. Not enough laws. That has to be it. NT.	Marinedem	Jun 2012	#14
More! Harder! Faster! Deeper!!!	PavePusher	Jun 2012	#29
The GC&RKBA SOP does not support non-gun porn.	OneTenthofOnePercent	Jun 2012	#30
Porn?!	PavePusher	Jun 2012	#35
This thread is epic...	virginia mountainman	Jun 2012	#63
At some point the stupidity must be pointed out	Spoonman	Jun 2012	#66

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.