HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Justice & Public Safety » Gun Control & RKBA (Group) » New Study Proves Microsta... » Reply #99

Reply #99


Response to OneTenthofOnePercent (Reply #54)

Fri Jun 15, 2012, 09:08 AM

99. Yes, in a few cases, a gun in your pants might be effective. But, you can't just look at guns from

that perspective. I think the number of times a gun is actually needed outside the home is quite small.

As to Canadian registry, it was quite different from merely keeping a data base of the original purchaser of a gun with microstamping and the image microstamped. Canada's system included licensure fees, forms sent in by owners (which were often in error), etc. Most importantly, the only part of the registry abandoned was the unrestricted long-gun (rifle portion). Handguns are still subject to registration and severely restricted.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 109 replies Author Time Post
SecularMotion Jun 2012 OP
PavePusher Jun 2012 #1
krispos42 Jun 2012 #47
PavePusher Jun 2012 #58
gejohnston Jun 2012 #61
PavePusher Jun 2012 #62
hack89 Jun 2012 #2
Remmah2 Jun 2012 #8
Dr_Scholl Jun 2012 #17
SGMRTDARMY Jun 2012 #3
Scootaloo Jun 2012 #6
SGMRTDARMY Jun 2012 #9
Scootaloo Jun 2012 #16
SGMRTDARMY Jun 2012 #19
Scootaloo Jun 2012 #21
gejohnston Jun 2012 #25
Scootaloo Jun 2012 #26
Tuesday Afternoon Jun 2012 #35
Scootaloo Jun 2012 #38
Tuesday Afternoon Jun 2012 #71
Tuesday Afternoon Jun 2012 #41
GreenStormCloud Jun 2012 #45
Hoyt Jun 2012 #49
Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2012 #103
Scootaloo Jun 2012 #72
GreenStormCloud Jun 2012 #79
Scootaloo Jun 2012 #81
spin Jun 2012 #105
gejohnston Jun 2012 #20
Scootaloo Jun 2012 #22
PavePusher Jun 2012 #32
Scootaloo Jun 2012 #33
GreenStormCloud Jun 2012 #48
krispos42 Jun 2012 #52
Tuesday Afternoon Jun 2012 #70
OneTenthofOnePercent Jun 2012 #18
Scootaloo Jun 2012 #23
OneTenthofOnePercent Jun 2012 #50
Scootaloo Jun 2012 #69
OneTenthofOnePercent Jun 2012 #73
Scootaloo Jun 2012 #89
OneTenthofOnePercent Jun 2012 #94
hack89 Jun 2012 #76
Scootaloo Jun 2012 #90
hack89 Jun 2012 #96
mvccd1000 Jun 2012 #87
Scootaloo Jun 2012 #88
Clames Jun 2012 #93
PavePusher Jun 2012 #28
Scootaloo Jun 2012 #30
PavePusher Jun 2012 #31
Scootaloo Jun 2012 #34
gejohnston Jun 2012 #46
PavePusher Jun 2012 #57
sarisataka Jun 2012 #4
krispos42 Jun 2012 #53
Remmah2 Jun 2012 #97
Remmah2 Jun 2012 #5
SecularMotion Jun 2012 #7
Remmah2 Jun 2012 #10
SGMRTDARMY Jun 2012 #12
Remmah2 Jun 2012 #15
Hoyt Jun 2012 #39
OneTenthofOnePercent Jun 2012 #54
LineLineLineLineLineLineLineReply Yes, in a few cases, a gun in your pants might be effective. But, you can't just look at guns from
Hoyt Jun 2012 #99
Remmah2 Jun 2012 #95
Hoyt Jun 2012 #100
ileus Jun 2012 #11
gejohnston Jun 2012 #13
rrneck Jun 2012 #14
Scootaloo Jun 2012 #24
rrneck Jun 2012 #36
slackmaster Jun 2012 #27
PavePusher Jun 2012 #29
Scootaloo Jun 2012 #37
Hoyt Jun 2012 #42
slackmaster Jun 2012 #43
Hoyt Jun 2012 #44
slackmaster Jun 2012 #55
gejohnston Jun 2012 #59
slackmaster Jun 2012 #65
Hoyt Jun 2012 #64
slackmaster Jun 2012 #66
petronius Jun 2012 #106
Glassunion Jun 2012 #108
slackmaster Jun 2012 #109
Clames Jun 2012 #40
Callisto32 Jun 2012 #92
Hoyt Jun 2012 #51
slackmaster Jun 2012 #56
Hoyt Jun 2012 #63
slackmaster Jun 2012 #67
GreenStormCloud Jun 2012 #60
Hoyt Jun 2012 #68
Clames Jun 2012 #74
Hoyt Jun 2012 #75
Clames Jun 2012 #78
Hoyt Jun 2012 #80
Clames Jun 2012 #85
GreenStormCloud Jun 2012 #77
Hoyt Jun 2012 #82
Straw Man Jun 2012 #83
Hoyt Jun 2012 #84
Glaug-Eldare Jun 2012 #86
Straw Man Jun 2012 #104
GreenStormCloud Jun 2012 #91
Hoyt Jun 2012 #101
GreenStormCloud Jun 2012 #102
ileus Jun 2012 #98
Glassunion Jun 2012 #107
Please login to view edit histories.