Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
He doen't understand the word "vigilantism". pipoman Apr 2012 #1
Don't carry a gun, and you won't kill, not even in supposed self-defense. JDPriestly Apr 2012 #3
Stand up and take your murdering like a man, huh? pipoman Apr 2012 #5
It's the price you gotta pay not to pollute society. ileus Apr 2012 #14
Problem is that criminals generally think they were attacked first. JDPriestly Apr 2012 #43
Are people with fire extinguishers paranoid / expecting fire? X_Digger Apr 2012 #46
If you are keeping your gun at hand and really not using it, you JDPriestly Apr 2012 #52
SYG can be about *anything* used in self-defense, not just guns. (the same with castle doctrine). X_Digger Apr 2012 #53
Most violence is not objectively speaking self-defense although JDPriestly Apr 2012 #45
based on? gejohnston Apr 2012 #47
Watching in courtrooms. JDPriestly Apr 2012 #54
"Of course, you have a right to self-defense." PavePusher Apr 2012 #55
no, you don't see those in small towns in the mid west gejohnston Apr 2012 #58
I agree that gun laws should be determined locally. JDPriestly Apr 2012 #59
Any other rights that should be handled locally? X_Digger Apr 2012 #61
Criminals do not seem generally keen to take safety, self-defense and anti-crime classes. PavePusher Apr 2012 #22
Smokers are not generally keen to give up smoking. JDPriestly Apr 2012 #42
Hope you don't have a family whose lives depend on you. nt hack89 Apr 2012 #29
Hilarious. Clames Apr 2012 #30
Brady does have a plan for saving lives. JDPriestly Apr 2012 #41
Guess again. Straw Man Apr 2012 #48
The NRA should pay as much to get the message about the dangers JDPriestly Apr 2012 #49
Why should my money go towards that? AH1Apache Apr 2012 #51
Your money should go toward that so that people like me who are on the fence, JDPriestly Apr 2012 #56
Please clarify. Straw Man Apr 2012 #57
In my view, you should be able to defend yourself anywhere but not with a gun. JDPriestly Apr 2012 #60
I see several problems. Straw Man Apr 2012 #62
Well, we shall have to wait to learn what the evidence shows, JDPriestly Apr 2012 #50
after all, guns were invented for one purpose: killing people nt msongs Apr 2012 #2
They push it because it makes money.Sell guns to crazies, sell 'em to the sane to protect themselves saras Apr 2012 #4
Yeah, and with .006% of guns in the US used in murders, we should outlaw them pipoman Apr 2012 #7
wait... .006% of guns? what's the percentage of murders committed with guns? Tunkamerica Apr 2012 #8
There are 300,000,000 known guns owned by private citizens in the United States GreydeeThos Apr 2012 #9
why is that a relevant statistic? I think the more relevant stat is the one where the activity Tunkamerica Apr 2012 #10
Also, you just made the previous poster's point again. That doesn't get you extra Tunkamerica Apr 2012 #11
all of them....any gunner baser is a toter wannabe zimmerman. ileus Apr 2012 #17
way to respond to someone who shares your view Tunkamerica Apr 2012 #18
'gun crime and gun murders' pipoman Apr 2012 #21
Are you certain... beevul Apr 2012 #28
Of course he/she is WinniSkipper Apr 2012 #44
And 0.4% of gun owners. X_Digger Apr 2012 #40
You actually feel... mvccd1000 Apr 2012 #6
I agree with you Becka2515 Apr 2012 #12
in the context of this debate the victim was in a public space where he had a right to be and Tunkamerica Apr 2012 #15
Absolutely not mvccd1000 Apr 2012 #19
but to claim "selective editing" and then "slanted reporting" then taking the side of the shooter Tunkamerica Apr 2012 #20
No-one here has "taken the side of the shooter". PavePusher Apr 2012 #23
"okay" i "guess" i was "wrong" Tunkamerica Apr 2012 #24
Yes, "you" were. n/t PavePusher Apr 2012 #26
......wow. Callisto32 Apr 2012 #34
Understandable mvccd1000 Apr 2012 #39
Which has what to do with George Zimmerman? Doctor_J Apr 2012 #27
if MSM and conventional wisdom is correct gejohnston Apr 2012 #31
Cite? Doctor_J Apr 2012 #33
reverse the situation gejohnston Apr 2012 #36
This is usually called a Straw Man Doctor_J Apr 2012 #37
I don't think so gejohnston Apr 2012 #38
We should all push SYG... ileus Apr 2012 #13
i think it's getting pushed right now. Tunkamerica Apr 2012 #16
He's exactly right. Gun carriers love these laws because they can screw up and shoot an unarmed Hoyt Apr 2012 #25
Screw up? Doctor_J Apr 2012 #32
They can "play cowboy" and claim self-defense all they want AH1Apache Apr 2012 #35
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»EJ Dionne: Why the NRA pu...»Reply #44