Reply #11

In the discussion thread: EJ Dionne: Why the NRA pushes ‘Stand Your Ground’ [View all]

Response to Tunkamerica (Reply #10)

Mon Apr 16, 2012, 06:25 AM

Tunkamerica (4,351 posts)

11. Also, you just made the previous poster's point again. That doesn't get you extra

troll points.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

62 replies	Author	Time	Post
EJ Dionne: Why the NRA pushes ‘Stand Your Ground’ [View all]	alp227	Apr 2012	OP
He doen't understand the word "vigilantism".	pipoman	Apr 2012	#1
Don't carry a gun, and you won't kill, not even in supposed self-defense.	JDPriestly	Apr 2012	#3
Stand up and take your murdering like a man, huh?	pipoman	Apr 2012	#5
It's the price you gotta pay not to pollute society.	ileus	Apr 2012	#14
Problem is that criminals generally think they were attacked first.	JDPriestly	Apr 2012	#43
Are people with fire extinguishers paranoid / expecting fire?	X_Digger	Apr 2012	#46
If you are keeping your gun at hand and really not using it, you	JDPriestly	Apr 2012	#52
SYG can be about anything used in self-defense, not just guns. (the same with castle doctrine).	X_Digger	Apr 2012	#53
Most violence is not objectively speaking self-defense although	JDPriestly	Apr 2012	#45
based on?	gejohnston	Apr 2012	#47
Watching in courtrooms.	JDPriestly	Apr 2012	#54
"Of course, you have a right to self-defense."	PavePusher	Apr 2012	#55
no, you don't see those in small towns in the mid west	gejohnston	Apr 2012	#58
I agree that gun laws should be determined locally.	JDPriestly	Apr 2012	#59
Any other rights that should be handled locally?	X_Digger	Apr 2012	#61
Criminals do not seem generally keen to take safety, self-defense and anti-crime classes.	PavePusher	Apr 2012	#22
Smokers are not generally keen to give up smoking.	JDPriestly	Apr 2012	#42
Hope you don't have a family whose lives depend on you. nt	hack89	Apr 2012	#29
Hilarious.	Clames	Apr 2012	#30
Brady does have a plan for saving lives.	JDPriestly	Apr 2012	#41
Guess again.	Straw Man	Apr 2012	#48
The NRA should pay as much to get the message about the dangers	JDPriestly	Apr 2012	#49
Why should my money go towards that?	AH1Apache	Apr 2012	#51
Your money should go toward that so that people like me who are on the fence,	JDPriestly	Apr 2012	#56
Please clarify.	Straw Man	Apr 2012	#57
In my view, you should be able to defend yourself anywhere but not with a gun.	JDPriestly	Apr 2012	#60
I see several problems.	Straw Man	Apr 2012	#62
Well, we shall have to wait to learn what the evidence shows,	JDPriestly	Apr 2012	#50
after all, guns were invented for one purpose: killing people nt	msongs	Apr 2012	#2
They push it because it makes money.Sell guns to crazies, sell 'em to the sane to protect themselves	saras	Apr 2012	#4
Yeah, and with .006% of guns in the US used in murders, we should outlaw them	pipoman	Apr 2012	#7
wait... .006% of guns? what's the percentage of murders committed with guns?	Tunkamerica	Apr 2012	#8
There are 300,000,000 known guns owned by private citizens in the United States	GreydeeThos	Apr 2012	#9
why is that a relevant statistic? I think the more relevant stat is the one where the activity	Tunkamerica	Apr 2012	#10
Also, you just made the previous poster's point again. That doesn't get you extra	Tunkamerica	Apr 2012	#11
all of them....any gunner baser is a toter wannabe zimmerman.	ileus	Apr 2012	#17
way to respond to someone who shares your view	Tunkamerica	Apr 2012	#18
'gun crime and gun murders'	pipoman	Apr 2012	#21
Are you certain...	beevul	Apr 2012	#28
Of course he/she is	WinniSkipper	Apr 2012	#44
And 0.4% of gun owners.	X_Digger	Apr 2012	#40
You actually feel...	mvccd1000	Apr 2012	#6
I agree with you	Becka2515	Apr 2012	#12
in the context of this debate the victim was in a public space where he had a right to be and	Tunkamerica	Apr 2012	#15
Absolutely not	mvccd1000	Apr 2012	#19
but to claim "selective editing" and then "slanted reporting" then taking the side of the shooter	Tunkamerica	Apr 2012	#20
No-one here has "taken the side of the shooter".	PavePusher	Apr 2012	#23
"okay" i "guess" i was "wrong"	Tunkamerica	Apr 2012	#24
Yes, "you" were. n/t	PavePusher	Apr 2012	#26
......wow.	Callisto32	Apr 2012	#34
Understandable	mvccd1000	Apr 2012	#39
Which has what to do with George Zimmerman?	Doctor_J	Apr 2012	#27
if MSM and conventional wisdom is correct	gejohnston	Apr 2012	#31
Cite?	Doctor_J	Apr 2012	#33
reverse the situation	gejohnston	Apr 2012	#36
This is usually called a Straw Man	Doctor_J	Apr 2012	#37
I don't think so	gejohnston	Apr 2012	#38
We should all push SYG...	ileus	Apr 2012	#13
i think it's getting pushed right now.	Tunkamerica	Apr 2012	#16
He's exactly right. Gun carriers love these laws because they can screw up and shoot an unarmed	Hoyt	Apr 2012	#25
Screw up?	Doctor_J	Apr 2012	#32
They can "play cowboy" and claim self-defense all they want	AH1Apache	Apr 2012	#35

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.