Reply #23

In the discussion thread: On Brewer's desk: bill to ease gun limits in public buildings (Arizona) [View all]

Sat Apr 14, 2012, 07:21 PM

gejohnston (12,567 posts)

23. doesn't sound mutally exclulive to me

he is asking why should you be prevented from
you are asking why one would or should.

The answer to your question depends on the individual circumstance.
My circumstance, there is no reason for me to.
A lady filing a restraining order, would have more reason. But being Florida, hope she can get a parking space where the deputies (who operate the metal detectors) at the door could come to her rescue if needed.
One of my county commissioners has had threats on his life. Same as reason number two.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

40 replies	Author	Time	Post
On Brewer's desk: bill to ease gun limits in public buildings (Arizona) [View all]	shadowrider	Apr 2012	OP
"a target rich environment"	Kolesar	Apr 2012	#1
He's obviously referring to the world view	Simo 1939_1940	Apr 2012	#2
Your comprehension skills need work...eom	Kolesar	Apr 2012	#7
This is a pretty standard phrase...	Glaug-Eldare	Apr 2012	#12
The VT shooter had a target rich environment (Read: Gun Free)	shadowrider	Apr 2012	#3
worked out good for the 2A haters.	ileus	Apr 2012	#9
Well, they got exactly what they wanted.	krispos42	Apr 2012	#13
This message was self-deleted by its author	Callisto32	Apr 2012	#33
That phrase is shorthand.	Callisto32	Apr 2012	#32
Hopefully they'd make provision for lockers, too	Glaug-Eldare	Apr 2012	#4
People are waiting outside for you with a gun	Kolesar	Apr 2012	#6
More to do with preparedness	Glaug-Eldare	Apr 2012	#10
Where did he say that	AH1Apache	Apr 2012	#11
If it hurts, you don't have to participate here...eom	Kolesar	Apr 2012	#14
Projecting much?	AH1Apache	Apr 2012	#15
This post was hidden by jury decision.	Callisto32	Apr 2012	#34
And the backlash cometh	AH1Apache	Apr 2012	#5
Why should the people be restricted access at their buildings.	ileus	Apr 2012	#8
I don't understand the question to be honest.	shadowrider	Apr 2012	#20
Why should people carry a gun in a public building?	COLGATE4	Apr 2012	#21
Because there is nothing special about them...	ManiacJoe	Apr 2012	#22
Nothing except for the possibility that in gov't buildings	COLGATE4	Apr 2012	#26
And those "unbalanced" foilks will obey the no guns signs of course	DonP	Apr 2012	#27
No, that's why courthouses have security to check	COLGATE4	Apr 2012	#30
Not all courthouses....	Callisto32	Apr 2012	#35
Funny how 'public buildings' turned into 'govt buildings', which turned into 'courthouses'.	X_Digger	Apr 2012	#38
Two problems with your question.	PavePusher	Apr 2012	#39
Sounds like a good reason to have some self defense tools with you.	ManiacJoe	Apr 2012	#28
I love it when the rhetoric always turns to self defense.	COLGATE4	Apr 2012	#31
Data suggest you are wrong.	Callisto32	Apr 2012	#36
Feel free to point me to such data	COLGATE4	Apr 2012	#40
Feel free to explain how you jumped to that conclusion.	ManiacJoe	Apr 2012	#37
doesn't sound mutally exclulive to me	gejohnston	Apr 2012	#23
First Jan Brewer supporter	safeinOhio	Apr 2012	#16
I support her	AH1Apache	Apr 2012	#17
Looks more like	gejohnston	Apr 2012	#18
Where did I say I support her? Show me the post pls.	shadowrider	Apr 2012	#19
You didn't say that in your post.	safeinOhio	Apr 2012	#24
No, your insinuation was quite evident.	PavePusher	Apr 2012	#25
Vetoed	mvccd1000	Apr 2012	#29

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.