Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

ileus

(15,396 posts)

8. Why should the people be restricted access at their buildings.

Reply to shadowrider (Original post)

Sat Apr 14, 2012, 12:15 PM

Apr 2012

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

On Brewer's desk: bill to ease gun limits in public buildings (Arizona) [View all] shadowrider Apr 2012 OP

"a target rich environment" Kolesar Apr 2012 #1

He's **obviously** referring to the world view Simo 1939_1940 Apr 2012 #2

Your comprehension skills need work...eom Kolesar Apr 2012 #7

This is a pretty standard phrase... Glaug-Eldare Apr 2012 #12

The VT shooter had a target rich environment (Read: Gun Free) shadowrider Apr 2012 #3

worked out good for the 2A haters. ileus Apr 2012 #9

Well, they got exactly what they wanted. krispos42 Apr 2012 #13

This message was self-deleted by its author Callisto32 Apr 2012 #33

That phrase is shorthand. Callisto32 Apr 2012 #32

Hopefully they'd make provision for lockers, too Glaug-Eldare Apr 2012 #4

People are waiting outside for you with a gun Kolesar Apr 2012 #6

More to do with preparedness Glaug-Eldare Apr 2012 #10

Where did he say that AH1Apache Apr 2012 #11

If it hurts, you don't have to participate here...eom Kolesar Apr 2012 #14

Projecting much? AH1Apache Apr 2012 #15

Post removed Post removed Apr 2012 #34

And the backlash cometh AH1Apache Apr 2012 #5

Why should the people be restricted access at their buildings. ileus Apr 2012 #8

I don't understand the question to be honest. shadowrider Apr 2012 #20

Why should people carry a gun in a public building? COLGATE4 Apr 2012 #21

Because there is nothing special about them... ManiacJoe Apr 2012 #22

Nothing except for the possibility that in gov't buildings COLGATE4 Apr 2012 #26

And those "unbalanced" foilks will obey the no guns signs of course DonP Apr 2012 #27

No, that's why courthouses have security to check COLGATE4 Apr 2012 #30

Not all courthouses.... Callisto32 Apr 2012 #35

Funny how 'public buildings' turned into 'govt buildings', which turned into 'courthouses'. X_Digger Apr 2012 #38

Two problems with your question. PavePusher Apr 2012 #39

Sounds like a good reason to have some self defense tools with you. ManiacJoe Apr 2012 #28

I love it when the rhetoric always turns to self defense. COLGATE4 Apr 2012 #31

Data suggest you are wrong. Callisto32 Apr 2012 #36

Feel free to point me to such data COLGATE4 Apr 2012 #40

Feel free to explain how you jumped to that conclusion. ManiacJoe Apr 2012 #37

doesn't sound mutally exclulive to me gejohnston Apr 2012 #23

First Jan Brewer supporter safeinOhio Apr 2012 #16

I support her AH1Apache Apr 2012 #17

Looks more like gejohnston Apr 2012 #18

Where did I say I support her? Show me the post pls. shadowrider Apr 2012 #19

You didn't say that in your post. safeinOhio Apr 2012 #24

No, your insinuation was quite evident. PavePusher Apr 2012 #25

Vetoed mvccd1000 Apr 2012 #29