Reply #177

"Apparently it is ok that NRA supports only RWers and does everything possible to defeat Dems."

Thats what YOU said.

Note the qualifying word "ONLY", used by you in that sentence.

"a handful--mostly DINOS... and you think THAT proves your point...?!"

No, thats not what I think.

I KNOW it disproves what you said. Think theyre endorsing those Democrats, in an effort to defeat them, do you? You did say "does everything possible to defeat Dems", didn't you?

Feel free to name which of them is a DINO. Then work your way through them, until you have a large majority of them - you know, "most" - that are DINOs. Seems like an aweful lot of effort to go through to to demean Democrats, particularly on Democraticunderground, but hey, knock yourself out.

Start with Bill Richardson and Brian Schweitzer. Oh, wait. they aren't. How about that "RWer" Howard Dean - Endorsed MULTIPLE times by the nra. No? You did say "NRA supports only RWers" didn't you?

Well, which ones are the DINOs then?

You asserted it, its up to you to substantiate it.


And unless you at least attempt it, you make perfectly, crystal, clear, that your anti-gun ideology is of a much higher priority than your allegiance to Democrats. And if you neither attempt it, nor attempt and succeed, you're just slurring Democrats with no evidence what so ever provided - in the name of anti-gun ideology.

Say, isn't it people from the anti-gun side of the issue that say we pro-gun Democrats are the ones always slurring Democrats in the gun forum?

Those shoes youre now wearing, are the shoes that anti-gunners have been trying to put on the feet of we pro-gun Democrats for a long time now.

How do you like 'em now, eh? Comfie?