Gun Control & RKBA

Simo 1939_1940

(768 posts)

123. "The overwhelming vote is a no brainer."

Tue Apr 10, 2012, 09:12 PM

Apr 2012

Yup.

And isn't it comforting to know that truly dedicated criminals will either be thwarted from their evil plans because this law is on the books, or they'll suffer more serious prison time as a result?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

135 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Could the Tulsa shooters claim immunity under Oklahoma's Castle Law? [View all] jpak Apr 2012 OP

Castle Doctrine is inside the home gejohnston Apr 2012 #1

Nope - includes cars in OK jpak Apr 2012 #2

It would apply if gejohnston Apr 2012 #3

It's their word against the black vicitims jpak Apr 2012 #5

that is not how it works gejohnston Apr 2012 #8

LOL fightthegoodfightnow Apr 2012 #15

Zimmerman has nothing to do with the castle doctrine gejohnston Apr 2012 #26

But where would you find 12 people with Riftaxe Apr 2012 #14

Uhmmmmm fightthegoodfightnow Apr 2012 #17

Uhmmmmmmm, no, it takes 12 to convict, not one. rl6214 Apr 2012 #29

I think that's his point. Starboard Tack Apr 2012 #32

Exactly fightthegoodfightnow Apr 2012 #36

And the pro-gun crowd just smiles, knowing that one of their own will likely not be convicted. Hoyt Apr 2012 #67

Uhmmmmmmmmm fightthegoodfightnow Apr 2012 #125

one for a mistrial gejohnston Apr 2012 #54

Here is part of that law that has nothing to do with your CASTLE Starboard Tack Apr 2012 #119

In Florida the investigation of the Martin shooting is continuing... spin Apr 2012 #25

You are wrong on both counts. one-eyed fat man Apr 2012 #110

Yep and I wasn't even aware that my State had it! teddy51 Apr 2012 #12

Did you read the whole thing? Like section D Starboard Tack Apr 2012 #118

no, just puts the gejohnston Apr 2012 #120

Is there evidence the tulsa shooters were attacked? nt rrneck Apr 2012 #4

there's a lot of evidence they were afeared of the black man. provis99 Apr 2012 #6

The statute quoted in the Op rrneck Apr 2012 #9

Wrong. Straw Man Apr 2012 #81

This is nonsensical flamebait, and an obvious attempt to disrupt the Gun Control & RKBA Group... petronius Apr 2012 #7

Your Sig Line CokeMachine Apr 2012 #10

And still absolutely NOTHING to dispute his claim. fightthegoodfightnow Apr 2012 #18

I'll dispute his claim. Straw Man Apr 2012 #23

Question fightthegoodfightnow Apr 2012 #24

Who? Straw Man Apr 2012 #79

You referenced 'he said, he said' fightthegoodfightnow Apr 2012 #124

Again, who? Straw Man Apr 2012 #127

That a Dead Man Can't Speak fightthegoodfightnow Apr 2012 #130

There were other witnesses. Straw Man Apr 2012 #134

Legitimate question of stupid GOP/NRA/ALEC vigilante laws jpak Apr 2012 #19

So now you've added ALEC to your shtick rl6214 Apr 2012 #31

An Axis of Evil® ? Glassunion Apr 2012 #38

That's all the OP has rl6214 Apr 2012 #30

Were they being attacked before the shootings? ileus Apr 2012 #11

Could jpak claim immunity under ignorance? PavePusher Apr 2012 #13

No foundation fightthegoodfightnow Apr 2012 #16

Actually there are less restriction on the first amendment than the second. Remmah2 Apr 2012 #39

Not True fightthegoodfightnow Apr 2012 #52

Probably wouldn't be a good idea to yell "fire" in a gun store either. Remmah2 Apr 2012 #53

Especially not with the people I see walking around in gun stores. Hoyt Apr 2012 #69

Why do you go to gun stores, Hoyt? Straw Man Apr 2012 #99

Not afraid of folks who can't leave home without a gun. Hoyt Apr 2012 #109

Ha BASS PRO, that explains everything. Remmah2 Apr 2012 #111

Posting to those like Zimmerman who carry routinely will make one like that. Hoyt Apr 2012 #113

I didn't mean the people. Straw Man Apr 2012 #112

Well then, was this an example of a Second Amendment Solution? jpak Apr 2012 #21

Some people should try a 5th amendment solution. Remmah2 Apr 2012 #40

Nah fightthegoodfightnow Apr 2012 #129

No. Feelings have nothing to do with the section you cited? aikoaiko Apr 2012 #20

No. GreenStormCloud Apr 2012 #22

You can't be serious. krispos42 Apr 2012 #27

Only you would think such a thing or ask such a question. rl6214 Apr 2012 #28

"anti-gun zealots"? I haven't noticed too many, if any. Starboard Tack Apr 2012 #33

But there are a number here that have embraced the term and admit to being anti-gun zealots rl6214 Apr 2012 #34

So, you carry to protect your family. Starboard Tack Apr 2012 #41

Does your family ever leave your sight? rl6214 Apr 2012 #78

Yes Starboard Tack Apr 2012 #90

Neither have I but you never know. rl6214 Apr 2012 #115

"you never know" - So true. Starboard Tack Apr 2012 #116

Well I'm glad we agree on "you never know" but rl6214 Apr 2012 #132

I do believe in being prepared. Very much so. Starboard Tack Apr 2012 #135

How about naming one or two who embrace the name. Starboard Tack Apr 2012 #42

easy gejohnston Apr 2012 #43

oh fer fuck's sake iverglas Apr 2012 #45

I belive I missed that one gejohnston Apr 2012 #50

really iverglas Apr 2012 #55

zealot is different than bigot gejohnston Apr 2012 #56

I'm not a zealot. ellisonz Apr 2012 #46

how does he ST define "pro gun zealot"? gejohnston Apr 2012 #49

What ellisonz said. DanTex Apr 2012 #47

you stay on the list gejohnston Apr 2012 #48

I'm also a "closet gunner". Go figure. DanTex Apr 2012 #59

I only know about you guys gejohnston Apr 2012 #60

So now you're claiming you've never met a single gun nut... Riiiiight... DanTex Apr 2012 #62

define gun nut gejohnston Apr 2012 #65

You don't like labels? Labels like "anti-gun zealot"? DanTex Apr 2012 #68

if you must. gejohnston Apr 2012 #74

One more time... DanTex Apr 2012 #75

the technology does not exist gejohnston Apr 2012 #77

Sorry, you aren't a credible source either. DanTex Apr 2012 #82

So one of your sources is a pro-gun blogger with a clear NRA bias, we can toss him out. DanTex Apr 2012 #76

not really gejohnston Apr 2012 #80

Yes, really. DanTex Apr 2012 #84

I never said she was lying gejohnston Apr 2012 #85

You claimed what she said was "demonstrably false". DanTex Apr 2012 #89

Yeah, about that report gejohnston Apr 2012 #92

Why do I always end up having to do your research for you? DanTex Apr 2012 #87

the aricle does not say that gejohnston Apr 2012 #91

What part of "the materials technology does exist" don't you understand? DanTex Apr 2012 #93

what part of gejohnston Apr 2012 #94

You do understand the difference between DanTex Apr 2012 #95

Yes I do gejohnston Apr 2012 #96

Again, the study literally said "the materials technology exists". DanTex Apr 2012 #97

what facts are those? gejohnston Apr 2012 #100

Evidence please. DanTex Apr 2012 #101

I have not found any evidence that gejohnston Apr 2012 #103

LOL. "I have to go with my version" DanTex Apr 2012 #104

no, she said Glock made the claim gejohnston Apr 2012 #106

Can't prove a negative. Straw Man Apr 2012 #117

A load. Straw Man Apr 2012 #98

Well, at least you recognize that she didn't actually say anything that was incorrect. DanTex Apr 2012 #102

I don't think anyone said it was the wrong thing to do gejohnston Apr 2012 #105

"The overwhelming vote is a no brainer." Simo 1939_1940 Apr 2012 #123

I see you like to play the same games. Straw Man Apr 2012 #114

Here's my take. DanTex Apr 2012 #121

Your take ... Straw Man Apr 2012 #126

Whether you admit it or not... DanTex Apr 2012 #128

Admit what? Straw Man Apr 2012 #131

Spot-on. And why (in this instance) Rachel is even sleazier than a liar. Simo 1939_1940 Apr 2012 #122

"Does any of this sound familiar? " rl6214 Apr 2012 #83

Iverglas wants to ban private ownership of handguns. That is not "gun-friendly". nt hack89 Apr 2012 #133

Proud to be included in the group. Like others, I'm against public toting. I also would like Hoyt Apr 2012 #70

why do you need to buy so many gejohnston Apr 2012 #71

Maybe collectors who don't carry. Don't see many like that around here though. Hoyt Apr 2012 #72

meth cooks are still gejohnston Apr 2012 #73

Yeah but, your side is losing and losing badly rl6214 Apr 2012 #86

I'm anti and a pro, depending on how I feel from day to day. ileus Apr 2012 #51

And there I was thinking you just left out the "sarcasm" thingy Starboard Tack Apr 2012 #64

I'll whine gejohnston Apr 2012 #57

I wouldn't describe you as a zealot Starboard Tack Apr 2012 #63

thanks but gejohnston Apr 2012 #66

out of the nine I listed gejohnston Apr 2012 #61

Proud to make your list. N/T GreenStormCloud Apr 2012 #107

Blatant, mornic flamebait. Callisto32 Apr 2012 #35

aka SSDD nt Remmah2 Apr 2012 #44

Yes, absolutely, they can claim immunity JustABozoOnThisBus Apr 2012 #37

Sure. discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #58

jpak, you have put a lot of energy into posting ridiculous crap in this forum slackmaster Apr 2012 #88

I suppose. They could also claim innocence under an insanity plea... OneTenthofOnePercent Apr 2012 #108