Reply #8

In the discussion thread: Spock on Gun Logic [View all]

Response to DWC (Original post)

Mon Apr 9, 2012, 11:08 AM

Remmah2 (3,291 posts)

8. SPOCK FOR PRESIDENT!

VERY LOGICAL!

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

63 replies	Author	Time	Post
Spock on Gun Logic [View all]	DWC	Apr 2012	OP
Spock never said that...you're just being silly...	rfranklin	Apr 2012	#1
Spock knows baser toters gunners guns kill people.	ileus	Apr 2012	#2
Is that another Pro Gunner threat?	Walk away	Apr 2012	#3
True.	Hoyt	Apr 2012	#4
maybe we shouldn't have assumed spock was a D all these years.	ileus	Apr 2012	#6
It's the Romulan in him.	jeepnstein	Apr 2012	#7
I thought he was Vulcan and Human?	rl6214	Apr 2012	#55
Geek mode on.	jeepnstein	Apr 2012	#57
Romulans ARE Vulcans	MicaelS	Apr 2012	#63
Interesting interpretation.	AtheistCrusader	Apr 2012	#9
There are other images of Spock	GreydeeThos	Apr 2012	#48
Huh?	PavePusher	Apr 2012	#13
why do you want to take stuff away from people? You want to take away the right for gays to marry	Tuesday Afternoon	Apr 2012	#49
Looks more like common sense to me	rl6214	Apr 2012	#54
If you think about it, it is really the opposite of a threat.	aikoaiko	Apr 2012	#61
Way too funny!!!	RegieRocker	Apr 2012	#5
SPOCK FOR PRESIDENT!	Remmah2	Apr 2012	#8
SYG laws will allow this	bongbong	Apr 2012	#10
Please show me where I can fill out a 4473 for a machine gun.	Remmah2	Apr 2012	#12
Sure you can conceal a .50 BMG:	Johnny Rico	Apr 2012	#14
asdf	bongbong	Apr 2012	#16
Well, I'm actually toying with the idea of buying a .50 GI conversion kit for my Glock.	Johnny Rico	Apr 2012	#18
If ya need it	bongbong	Apr 2012	#21
It's perfectly legal, and I don't need it to "feel safe".	Johnny Rico	Apr 2012	#23
Yeah, sure	bongbong	Apr 2012	#29
You would be doing direct harm to someone who doesn't deserve it.	Johnny Rico	Apr 2012	#30
Sure, if you're a Chicago alderman you can do whatever you want!	DonP	Apr 2012	#47
And there are people who feel unsafe at the thought of a firearm.	Remmah2	Apr 2012	#44
pretzel logic is twisted.	Tuesday Afternoon	Apr 2012	#50
Mini .50.	Callisto32	Apr 2012	#31
asdf	bongbong	Apr 2012	#15
So if a person owns 352 guns. Or say only 2..........	Remmah2	Apr 2012	#17
Yawn	bongbong	Apr 2012	#19
Some good answers.	Remmah2	Apr 2012	#24
OK	bongbong	Apr 2012	#28
Please continue...	discntnt_irny_srcsm	Apr 2012	#32
As opposed to cut and paste answers?	Remmah2	Apr 2012	#37
OK	bongbong	Apr 2012	#41
Debate?	Remmah2	Apr 2012	#45
because	Tuesday Afternoon	Apr 2012	#51
Princess Leia would not have approved of a 3 day waiting period.	Remmah2	Apr 2012	#43
NRA talking points?	rl6214	Apr 2012	#56
"Criminals are exempt from the law."	DWC	Apr 2012	#58
I got more results	Glassunion	Apr 2012	#34
asdf	bongbong	Apr 2012	#38
The question was "What good does a 3 day waiting period make?"	Glassunion	Apr 2012	#46
Um... Did you actually read any of those articles?	sarisataka	Apr 2012	#52
so Florida and California should have lower murder rates	gejohnston	Apr 2012	#53
Waiting periods make gun controllers feel good about themselves.	Johnny Rico	Apr 2012	#20
asdf	bongbong	Apr 2012	#22
The issue has been researched.	Remmah2	Apr 2012	#25
You bet!	bongbong	Apr 2012	#27
So name them.	beevul	Apr 2012	#33
asdf	bongbong	Apr 2012	#35
I read post 19.	beevul	Apr 2012	#42
I can answer a question.	Remmah2	Apr 2012	#36
Yep	bongbong	Apr 2012	#39
The unanswered question.	Remmah2	Apr 2012	#40
Oh my	Glaug-Eldare	Apr 2012	#11
welcome to DU	Tuesday Afternoon	Apr 2012	#59
Since we're on the subject of Star Trek and guns...	Johnny Rico	Apr 2012	#26
~	Tuesday Afternoon	Apr 2012	#60
how does this fit the SoP? what am I missing here? has this one NOT been alerted?	Tuesday Afternoon	Apr 2012	#62

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.