Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
ideology before the whole truth, I'm disappointed gejohnston Apr 2012 #1
excellent and well documented post. thanks. Tuesday Afternoon Apr 2012 #2
Good points. n/t burf Apr 2012 #4
LOL, the "whole truth"... DanTex Apr 2012 #6
Each state has to pass legistlation hack89 Apr 2012 #8
Like I said in my last post: DanTex Apr 2012 #9
Closing the private-party "loophole" would only lead to massive straw purchases instead. LAGC Apr 2012 #44
It's not even "strict constructionism" per say... ellisonz Apr 2012 #84
more logical fallacies and straw men gejohnston Apr 2012 #10
In other words, no, you can't back your previous post with any actual evidence. DanTex Apr 2012 #12
more false claims about gun blogs gejohnston Apr 2012 #13
About that wikileaks cable. DanTex Apr 2012 #16
What does that 90% mean... (long rant) sarisataka Apr 2012 #37
But what you and gejohnston are both missing... DanTex Apr 2012 #69
There are simple solutions discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #70
Good reply sarisataka Apr 2012 #78
Disagree about a few things. DanTex Apr 2012 #81
We can agree to disagree sarisataka Apr 2012 #83
On what do you base your conclusion ... Straw Man Apr 2012 #38
My basis is sarisataka Apr 2012 #40
I was asking DanTex. Straw Man Apr 2012 #41
one more time gejohnston Apr 2012 #54
The boy who cried "wikileaks"... DanTex Apr 2012 #67
Post 18 put it best gejohnston Apr 2012 #77
Actually, he pretty well gutted your screed (nt) ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2012 #18
LOL. Thanks for sharing your brilliant insight, "professor"! DanTex Apr 2012 #20
You are most welcome ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2012 #23
That dog don't hunt. n/t ellisonz Apr 2012 #85
You anti-gun zealots and your "gunshow loophole"... rl6214 Apr 2012 #50
Wow. krispos42 Apr 2012 #65
Objectively Factual and extremely well stated. Thanks ! n/t DWC Apr 2012 #71
The documentary let the ATF spew their burf Apr 2012 #3
It's illegal for ANY PERSON to transfer a firearm to someone who is prohibited from buying it slackmaster Apr 2012 #5
Not quite DanTex Apr 2012 #7
the hits keep coming gejohnston Apr 2012 #11
In other words, I was right. DanTex Apr 2012 #14
So what new laws would you propose to remedy this? oneshooter Apr 2012 #15
Umm... I would require background checks on private sales. DanTex Apr 2012 #17
Yep. But most would ignore my questions. oneshooter Apr 2012 #19
Umm... I'd accomplish it with a federal law, requiring background checks... DanTex Apr 2012 #21
So you would rather bitch and gripe instead of doing something. oneshooter Apr 2012 #25
Well, we're both posting on an internet forum right now, so... DanTex Apr 2012 #27
Such a federal law... discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #28
Like I said above... DanTex Apr 2012 #29
As stated above... discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #31
Can you find a link? DanTex Apr 2012 #34
The legislation they support... discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #36
Here's the MAIG report "Fatal Gaps": DanTex Apr 2012 #39
Okay, please check this carefully. discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #45
In other words, you were completely wrong. DanTex Apr 2012 #46
Have nice life... discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #48
Just some supporting data discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #49
More speculation, no constitutional scholar... DanTex Apr 2012 #68
You should take your own advice. Clames Apr 2012 #72
Keep sleeping. discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #79
That is not possible under current law. ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2012 #22
Right, that's why I want the law to be changed... DanTex Apr 2012 #26
Is it practical to expect that amount of change in the foreseeable future? ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2012 #30
I'm in favor of what's right, not what is currently popular. DanTex Apr 2012 #33
IMHO... discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #35
We have that requirement here in California CokeMachine Apr 2012 #24
Let me also say... discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2012 #32
re read the first paragraph of post one gejohnston Apr 2012 #42
You must be aware ... Straw Man Apr 2012 #43
Better than coddling gun owners/accumulators. Hoyt Apr 2012 #47
More from the peanut gallery... rl6214 Apr 2012 #52
So if... sarisataka Apr 2012 #55
If you want to wear a swastika with your gun, it's legal. But Hoyt Apr 2012 #56
my opinion as well sarisataka Apr 2012 #57
I don't like businesses that rip people off, wall Street types, among others. Point is that it's Hoyt Apr 2012 #58
Something we agree on sarisataka Apr 2012 #60
You have managed to turn the argument 180 degrees sarisataka Apr 2012 #53
How much did they have to pay legislators to believe that crud? Hoyt Apr 2012 #59
7.2 million in 2010 elections sarisataka Apr 2012 #61
If we are going to play "not greats" - howsabout 6 year old shoots friend with Hoyt Apr 2012 #62
Shall we ask... sarisataka Apr 2012 #63
First off, a bunch of uses of guns aren't necessary. Other than a few cases, Hoyt Apr 2012 #64
Ask this mom who slept safely with gun under pillow until 4 year old shot son shot himself yesterday Hoyt Apr 2012 #73
I saw that gejohnston Apr 2012 #74
Tragic... sarisataka Apr 2012 #76
Yes, I know all about the NRA fantasy world. DanTex Apr 2012 #66
You are correct, it never happens... oh wait... sarisataka Apr 2012 #75
For example... DanTex Apr 2012 #80
Thank you sarisataka Apr 2012 #82
"You see, the NRA wants all criminals to have guns, not just the ones who haven't committed a felony rl6214 Apr 2012 #51
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»A Vanguard documentary is...»Reply #48