Reply #32

In the discussion thread: A Vanguard documentary is saying guns can be sold to criminals w/o ID, paperwork [View all]

Sat Apr 7, 2012, 02:20 PM

32. Let me also say...

...that some states require this now. I find this entirely reasonable. MAIG has made efforts to level state laws and standards in this and other regards.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

85 replies	Author	Time	Post
A Vanguard documentary is saying guns can be sold to criminals w/o ID, paperwork [View all]	CreekDog	Apr 2012	OP
ideology before the whole truth, I'm disappointed	gejohnston	Apr 2012	#1
excellent and well documented post. thanks.	Tuesday Afternoon	Apr 2012	#2
Good points. n/t	burf	Apr 2012	#4
LOL, the "whole truth"...	DanTex	Apr 2012	#6
Each state has to pass legistlation	hack89	Apr 2012	#8
Like I said in my last post:	DanTex	Apr 2012	#9
Closing the private-party "loophole" would only lead to massive straw purchases instead.	LAGC	Apr 2012	#44
It's not even "strict constructionism" per say...	ellisonz	Apr 2012	#84
more logical fallacies and straw men	gejohnston	Apr 2012	#10
In other words, no, you can't back your previous post with any actual evidence.	DanTex	Apr 2012	#12
more false claims about gun blogs	gejohnston	Apr 2012	#13
About that wikileaks cable.	DanTex	Apr 2012	#16
What does that 90% mean... (long rant)	sarisataka	Apr 2012	#37
But what you and gejohnston are both missing...	DanTex	Apr 2012	#69
There are simple solutions	discntnt_irny_srcsm	Apr 2012	#70
Good reply	sarisataka	Apr 2012	#78
Disagree about a few things.	DanTex	Apr 2012	#81
We can agree to disagree	sarisataka	Apr 2012	#83
On what do you base your conclusion ...	Straw Man	Apr 2012	#38
My basis is	sarisataka	Apr 2012	#40
I was asking DanTex.	Straw Man	Apr 2012	#41
one more time	gejohnston	Apr 2012	#54
The boy who cried "wikileaks"...	DanTex	Apr 2012	#67
Post 18 put it best	gejohnston	Apr 2012	#77
Actually, he pretty well gutted your screed (nt)	ProgressiveProfessor	Apr 2012	#18
LOL. Thanks for sharing your brilliant insight, "professor"!	DanTex	Apr 2012	#20
You are most welcome	ProgressiveProfessor	Apr 2012	#23
That dog don't hunt. n/t	ellisonz	Apr 2012	#85
You anti-gun zealots and your "gunshow loophole"...	rl6214	Apr 2012	#50
Wow.	krispos42	Apr 2012	#65
Objectively Factual and extremely well stated. Thanks ! n/t	DWC	Apr 2012	#71
The documentary let the ATF spew their	burf	Apr 2012	#3
It's illegal for ANY PERSON to transfer a firearm to someone who is prohibited from buying it	slackmaster	Apr 2012	#5
Not quite	DanTex	Apr 2012	#7
the hits keep coming	gejohnston	Apr 2012	#11
In other words, I was right.	DanTex	Apr 2012	#14
So what new laws would you propose to remedy this?	oneshooter	Apr 2012	#15
Umm... I would require background checks on private sales.	DanTex	Apr 2012	#17
Yep. But most would ignore my questions.	oneshooter	Apr 2012	#19
Umm... I'd accomplish it with a federal law, requiring background checks...	DanTex	Apr 2012	#21
So you would rather bitch and gripe instead of doing something.	oneshooter	Apr 2012	#25
Well, we're both posting on an internet forum right now, so...	DanTex	Apr 2012	#27
Such a federal law...	discntnt_irny_srcsm	Apr 2012	#28
Like I said above...	DanTex	Apr 2012	#29
As stated above...	discntnt_irny_srcsm	Apr 2012	#31
Can you find a link?	DanTex	Apr 2012	#34
The legislation they support...	discntnt_irny_srcsm	Apr 2012	#36
Here's the MAIG report "Fatal Gaps":	DanTex	Apr 2012	#39
Okay, please check this carefully.	discntnt_irny_srcsm	Apr 2012	#45
In other words, you were completely wrong.	DanTex	Apr 2012	#46
Have nice life...	discntnt_irny_srcsm	Apr 2012	#48
Just some supporting data	discntnt_irny_srcsm	Apr 2012	#49
More speculation, no constitutional scholar...	DanTex	Apr 2012	#68
You should take your own advice.	Clames	Apr 2012	#72
Keep sleeping.	discntnt_irny_srcsm	Apr 2012	#79
That is not possible under current law.	ProgressiveProfessor	Apr 2012	#22
Right, that's why I want the law to be changed...	DanTex	Apr 2012	#26
Is it practical to expect that amount of change in the foreseeable future?	ProgressiveProfessor	Apr 2012	#30
I'm in favor of what's right, not what is currently popular.	DanTex	Apr 2012	#33
IMHO...	discntnt_irny_srcsm	Apr 2012	#35
We have that requirement here in California	CokeMachine	Apr 2012	#24
Let me also say...	discntnt_irny_srcsm	Apr 2012	#32
re read the first paragraph of post one	gejohnston	Apr 2012	#42
You must be aware ...	Straw Man	Apr 2012	#43
Better than coddling gun owners/accumulators.	Hoyt	Apr 2012	#47
More from the peanut gallery...	rl6214	Apr 2012	#52
So if...	sarisataka	Apr 2012	#55
If you want to wear a swastika with your gun, it's legal. But	Hoyt	Apr 2012	#56
my opinion as well	sarisataka	Apr 2012	#57
I don't like businesses that rip people off, wall Street types, among others. Point is that it's	Hoyt	Apr 2012	#58
Something we agree on	sarisataka	Apr 2012	#60
You have managed to turn the argument 180 degrees	sarisataka	Apr 2012	#53
How much did they have to pay legislators to believe that crud?	Hoyt	Apr 2012	#59
7.2 million in 2010 elections	sarisataka	Apr 2012	#61
If we are going to play "not greats" - howsabout 6 year old shoots friend with	Hoyt	Apr 2012	#62
Shall we ask...	sarisataka	Apr 2012	#63
First off, a bunch of uses of guns aren't necessary. Other than a few cases,	Hoyt	Apr 2012	#64
Ask this mom who slept safely with gun under pillow until 4 year old shot son shot himself yesterday	Hoyt	Apr 2012	#73
I saw that	gejohnston	Apr 2012	#74
Tragic...	sarisataka	Apr 2012	#76
Yes, I know all about the NRA fantasy world.	DanTex	Apr 2012	#66
You are correct, it never happens... oh wait...	sarisataka	Apr 2012	#75
For example...	DanTex	Apr 2012	#80
Thank you	sarisataka	Apr 2012	#82
"You see, the NRA wants all criminals to have guns, not just the ones who haven't committed a felony	rl6214	Apr 2012	#51

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.