Gun Control & RKBA

samsingh

(17,590 posts)

9. Permits should be required.

Reply to oneshooter (Reply #5)

Fri Mar 16, 2012, 02:53 PM

Mar 2012

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

59 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

S.D. governor vetoes concealed handgun bill [View all] Eugene Mar 2012 OP

Why don't we just go back to the days of the old wild west montanacowboy Mar 2012 #1

Your knowledge of history.... PavePusher Mar 2012 #2

been watching a lot of B westerns on Classic Movie Channel? gejohnston Mar 2012 #4

Personally I prefer lever action rifles. Remmah2 Mar 2012 #6

they want more then that bowens43 Mar 2012 #7

They do? gejohnston Mar 2012 #10

Sounds like... discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2012 #23

+1000 ellisonz Mar 2012 #29

this sounds good samsingh Mar 2012 #3

Why? oneshooter Mar 2012 #5

Permits should be required. samsingh Mar 2012 #9

May I see your First, Fourth, Thirteenth and Twenty-Fourth Amendment permits, please? n/t PavePusher Mar 2012 #13

they are not the same thing samsingh Mar 2012 #30

Just as the others will assure the proper use of those rights. oneshooter Mar 2012 #38

Eureka! That explains why there are no car wrecks by licenced drivers! PavePusher Mar 2012 #45

Drop that old argument. First off...... Logical Mar 2012 #44

May I see your voter ID, please? Voting is limited by minimum age, residence and Citizenship. PavePusher Mar 2012 #46

Like I said, even what I suspect is to you a great Justice, Scalia (who I think is an asshole) has.. Logical Mar 2012 #47

Then you have converted a Constitutional Right into a priviledge dependent on conditions.... PavePusher Mar 2012 #48

The SCOUS does not agree with you, at least yet. n-t Logical Mar 2012 #50

They can't currently have a binding opinion, as that matter has not been presented to them. PavePusher Mar 2012 #51

Training and licenses do not seem extreme to me. n-t Logical Mar 2012 #52

A Voice for Sanity!! lastlib Mar 2012 #8

i agree with you completely. samsingh Mar 2012 #11

Got stats? PavePusher Mar 2012 #14

i am allowed to express my opinion without having a bibliography samsingh Mar 2012 #31

You can here, in most places. gejohnston Mar 2012 #37

Exept that you expressed it as fact, not opinion. oneshooter Mar 2012 #39

What happens if you were attacked by an individual or gang that did not carry firearms? Remmah2 Mar 2012 #53

Great. You'll be happy to know shadowrider Mar 2012 #12

LOL - Is that the best you've got? Swimming pools and cars? Starboard Tack Mar 2012 #16

those less common than twenty years ago gejohnston Mar 2012 #17

Well heck GE, more people are killed by cancer. So what? Starboard Tack Mar 2012 #18

Heck Starboard gejohnston Mar 2012 #19

That's a skewed perspective Starboard Tack Mar 2012 #20

not skewed, shows relative safety gejohnston Mar 2012 #21

Good points about S. Dakota, VT, WY and Mayberry Starboard Tack Mar 2012 #25

Do you really think that guns under the control of non-criminals, used for defense... PavePusher Mar 2012 #26

No, I'm not implying that at all. Starboard Tack Mar 2012 #27

but there is no evidence on your side gejohnston Mar 2012 #28

Wave runners and jet skis, I detest with a passion, gejohnston Mar 2012 #49

cars require a driving licence samsingh Mar 2012 #34

to operate on public roads gejohnston Mar 2012 #36

i don't recall seeing too many of those samsingh Mar 2012 #33

Suicide and family extermination has been done by car. Remmah2 Mar 2012 #55

I'm not saying it hasn't, but hardly on a daily basis. Starboard Tack Mar 2012 #56

assuming that was the reason gejohnston Mar 2012 #57

Pretty much like "it's a constitutional right" doesn't sell with rational people Starboard Tack Mar 2012 #58

actually it is gejohnston Mar 2012 #59

the point of a swimming pool is to swim, cars is to travel samsingh Mar 2012 #32

Correct, and that is a perfectly legitimate purpose. NewMoonTherian Mar 2012 #40

the problem becomes when those things being hit are innocent people or other life forms samsingh Mar 2012 #41

Is that right shown under the 57th or 83rd amendments? oneshooter Mar 2012 #42

Outstanding. Hoyt Mar 2012 #15

I see you're lovin a Republican now. aikoaiko Mar 2012 #22

i'd rather have legal weed than more and more guns samsingh Mar 2012 #35

I'm open minded to both. Remmah2 Mar 2012 #54

Maybe they'll vote for a strong 2A democrat who will sign this bill. ileus Mar 2012 #24

I 100% agree with this. I think some training should be required. And 21 is a good age. Logical Mar 2012 #43