Reply #75

In the discussion thread: Md Gun law found unconstitutional [View all]

Response to discntnt_irny_srcsm (Reply #71)

Fri Mar 9, 2012, 05:46 PM

75. See "importance of a well regulated militia"

there are none so blind as those who will not see.

That's true. But I'm not the one who will not see. You will not see anything except the word "citizens."

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

110 replies	Author	Time	Post
Md Gun law found unconstitutional [View all]	kelly1mm	Mar 2012	OP
once again our courts get it wrong...truley pathetic.	bowens43	Mar 2012	#1
I think the rulling is in keeping with the Heller and McDonald cases.	kelly1mm	Mar 2012	#2
Violate their rights 'for the children'...got it..	pipoman	Mar 2012	#3
so drug gangs apply for CCWs?	gejohnston	Mar 2012	#5
"Our courts get it wrong" ?? Excuse me?	MerkMan	Mar 2012	#10
It's a militia amendment.	Glenn Vardy	Mar 2012	#14
Please read your own post carefully...	virginia mountainman	Mar 2012	#15
"Every member of society..."	Glenn Vardy	Mar 2012	#19
grasping at straws.	virginia mountainman	Mar 2012	#25
Cite your evidence, please. n/t	PavePusher	Mar 2012	#28
It IS evidence.	Glenn Vardy	Mar 2012	#31
Cite the historical records, writtings of the authors of the Constitution and Amendments...	PavePusher	Mar 2012	#38
LOOK AT IT	Glenn Vardy	Mar 2012	#52
Picking up a gun?	Glenn Vardy	Mar 2012	#57
They did.	AtheistCrusader	Mar 2012	#98
If they did, then...	Glenn Vardy	Mar 2012	#99
Not to me.	AtheistCrusader	Mar 2012	#105
Side quibble, but when quoting something	AtheistCrusader	Mar 2012	#97
Easier to distort?	Glenn Vardy	Mar 2012	#101
But one 'draft' has legal force in law.	AtheistCrusader	Mar 2012	#106
My personal characterization...	discntnt_irny_srcsm	Mar 2012	#32
Mason in context	Glenn Vardy	Mar 2012	#34
The exemption of public officers...	discntnt_irny_srcsm	Mar 2012	#36
Unrelated???	Glenn Vardy	Mar 2012	#50
re: "...when "the people" are bearing arms, they're maintaining a militia."	discntnt_irny_srcsm	Mar 2012	#58
The importance of a "well regulated militia."	Glenn Vardy	Mar 2012	#63
the militia	discntnt_irny_srcsm	Mar 2012	#71
See "importance of a well regulated militia"	Glenn Vardy	Mar 2012	#75
re: "...I'm not the one who will not see."	discntnt_irny_srcsm	Mar 2012	#78
More quotes addressed	Glenn Vardy	Mar 2012	#79
As I said...	discntnt_irny_srcsm	Mar 2012	#80
Regardless of your blatant misinterpretation, MY state has no such clause to misinterpret.	AtheistCrusader	Mar 2012	#94
Explain my misinterpretation.	Glenn Vardy	Mar 2012	#95
The second half was aimed, quite obviously, at individuals and corporations building	AtheistCrusader	Mar 2012	#96
"Aimed.. at individuals?"	Glenn Vardy	Mar 2012	#102
I'm not sure if we're speaking the same language, or if you are being intentionally obtuse.	AtheistCrusader	Mar 2012	#107
Ummmm....did youread what you quoted?	Atypical Liberal	Mar 2012	#16
Did you only read the word "themselves?"	Glenn Vardy	Mar 2012	#17
So "themselves" excludes individuals?	Atypical Liberal	Mar 2012	#18
You're still focusing on "themselves."	Glenn Vardy	Mar 2012	#20
That's because all it takes is one example to demonstrate the hole in your arguement.	Atypical Liberal	Mar 2012	#21
Right to assemble	Glenn Vardy	Mar 2012	#22
Like I said, even the President disagrees with your interpretation.	Atypical Liberal	Mar 2012	#23
Rights differ in their application.	Glenn Vardy	Mar 2012	#26
remember when	gejohnston	Mar 2012	#27
What's your point?	Glenn Vardy	Mar 2012	#29
my point	gejohnston	Mar 2012	#30
I'm changing the definition?	Glenn Vardy	Mar 2012	#33
so riddle me this	gejohnston	Mar 2012	#35
"The people" in the U.S. BoR	Glenn Vardy	Mar 2012	#72
Because I don't understand what you are trying to say.	Atypical Liberal	Mar 2012	#39
Being a Harvard graduate is no particular guarantee of infallibility. n/t	PavePusher	Mar 2012	#40
But it probably puts you ahead of some internet expert. n/t	Atypical Liberal	Mar 2012	#42
For gejohnston	Glenn Vardy	Mar 2012	#47
I'm not going to slog through this. I reject the entire premise of "collective rights".	Atypical Liberal	Mar 2012	#49
You reject what's plain to see.	Glenn Vardy	Mar 2012	#51
Why I'm doing this	Glenn Vardy	Mar 2012	#53
Name one way that that is true.	Atypical Liberal	Mar 2012	#55
There is nothing that the people as a whole can do that a single person cannot do.	Atypical Liberal	Mar 2012	#54
Vice President Jones?	Glenn Vardy	Mar 2012	#60
They have the same rights to do those things as anyone else.	Atypical Liberal	Mar 2012	#61
One thing?	Glenn Vardy	Mar 2012	#66
Name one action that individuals cannot do that people can do.	Atypical Liberal	Mar 2012	#74
Chirp chirp chirp - still waiting.	Atypical Liberal	Mar 2012	#67
Your one thing	Glenn Vardy	Mar 2012	#68
You are confusing ACTIONS with SUCCESS.	Atypical Liberal	Mar 2012	#73
Wrong questions = wrong conclusions	Glenn Vardy	Mar 2012	#76
You're almost there. What ACTIONS do individuals have the RIGHT to do.	Atypical Liberal	Mar 2012	#81
Your answer	Glenn Vardy	Mar 2012	#84
Nope, still no actions listed that the public can undertake that individuals cannot.	Atypical Liberal	Mar 2012	#88
"Alone"	Glenn Vardy	Mar 2012	#90
Still doesn't answer the question.	Atypical Liberal	Mar 2012	#92
Do you agree?	Glenn Vardy	Mar 2012	#93
You still can't answer the question.	Atypical Liberal	Mar 2012	#100
An individual acting "alone."	Glenn Vardy	Mar 2012	#103
You gonna answer my question?	Atypical Liberal	Mar 2012	#104
Chirp chirp chirp...	Atypical Liberal	Mar 2012	#108
A belated...	ellisonz	Mar 2012	#41
Thank you...	Glenn Vardy	Mar 2012	#44
BTW...	discntnt_irny_srcsm	Mar 2012	#82
Thank you too, but...	Glenn Vardy	Mar 2012	#85
fine	discntnt_irny_srcsm	Mar 2012	#86
Collective right, personal exemption	Glenn Vardy	Mar 2012	#89
Oh, the hyperbole!	cleanhippie	Mar 2012	#24
I bet the court...	discntnt_irny_srcsm	Mar 2012	#37
Lovejoy'd on the first post.	Callisto32	Mar 2012	#48
"truly pathetic??	orangeagent27	Apr 2012	#109
Helen Lovejoy agrees with you:	friendly_iconoclast	Apr 2012	#110
Bit late on this one OP...	Clames	Mar 2012	#4
Was this already posted? EDIT - it was! Sorry! This thread can be closed mods!	kelly1mm	Mar 2012	#6
Just a few entries down.	Clames	Mar 2012	#8
I made the mistake of checking in latest threads instead of the forum - lesson learned. Sorry again	kelly1mm	Mar 2012	#9
Don't fret, sometimes a little redundancy is not a bad thing. 8>) n/t	PavePusher	Mar 2012	#11
Well, it's not as if this ever happens in GD. Say, with Rush threads...	Johnny Rico	Mar 2012	#12
Don't think 'rationing' is the correct term.	elleng	Mar 2012	#7
"Rationing" can also be used to describe meting something out by perceived need.	TheWraith	Mar 2012	#13
not exactly authoritative, is it?	iverglas	Mar 2012	#43
What "very important implications of the ruling for public safety"	pipoman	Mar 2012	#45
was "the discrimination of bias" argued in this case?	iverglas	Mar 2012	#46
The United States of America found the right. Twice.	TPaine7	Mar 2012	#56
somebody sure has Judge Legg's number	iverglas	Mar 2012	#59
This post was hidden by jury decision.	TPaine7	Mar 2012	#64
Did you miss this?	pipoman	Mar 2012	#83
oh my	iverglas	Mar 2012	#91
Here's a link to the opinion:	petronius	Mar 2012	#62
strikes me that the solution is precisely tailored to the problem it is intended to solve	iverglas	Mar 2012	#65
But he also found that there is not a "general prohibition on	petronius	Mar 2012	#69
my reference was to the Maryland legislation:	iverglas	Mar 2012	#70
The Maryland legislation which he just said was unconstitutional	petronius	Mar 2012	#77
Is this the part where blood starts running in the streets?	Kennah	Mar 2012	#87

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.