Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
Showing Original Post only (View all)The Brady campaign sued Lucky Gunner, attempting to "put them out of business".. [View all]
The judge made this statement in his ruling:
"It is apparent that this case was filed to pursue the political purposes of the Brady Center and, given the failure to present any cognizable legal claim, bringing these defendants [Lucky Gunner] into the Colorado court... appears to be more of an opportunity to propagandize the public and stigmatize the defendants than to obtain a court order."
So they naturally lost, and not only did they lose, they lost big, and they are appealing the case to a higher court too loose some more.. Now the Lucky Gunner, is going to donate 100% percent of the "Brady" money back into gun rights advocacy groups, and they have a poll on their website allowing visitors to vote to whom should they donate the Brady Campaign's money too..
It amazes me how one side, can so turn it around, and use the other side's own money against them.
http://www.luckygunner.com/brady-v-lucky-gunner
Just reporting the facts, without emotional embellishments for all to see.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
130 replies, 12733 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
130 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Brady campaign sued Lucky Gunner, attempting to "put them out of business".. [View all]
virginia mountainman
Jun 2015
OP
Putting facts into the equation...the legal costs order was against the two parents of a gun slain child.
Fred Sanders
Jul 2015
#13
Boring and pathetically obtuse standard fare....Welcome to Ignore, #45. I grow weary of this common NRA-lover's tripe.
Fred Sanders
Jul 2015
#21
45 is quite the Ignore List. I think the last person to have a list that long was --
Nuclear Unicorn
Jul 2015
#31
Only "frivolous" because the law has been gerrymandered to favor gun factories. The law is being
Fred Sanders
Jul 2015
#42
There are 340 million guns in America. Research completed....Conclusion: there are too many guns.
Fred Sanders
Jul 2015
#48
In a court not presided over by a RW gun nut Judge with RW gun nut laws, of course it is the most irrefutable argument
Fred Sanders
Jul 2015
#53
Guns are the definition of tort lawsuits. LOL If we lived in a sane society, that is.
randys1
Jul 2015
#76
So you DO Get to call me a nut, guess what would happen if I called you a gun nut
randys1
Jul 2015
#98
What would happen if someone on DU called me a gun nut? Around here, I'd call it Tuesday.
Shamash
Jul 2015
#99
My position is simple, really. Apart from the simple fact that the 2nd only allows for guns
randys1
Jul 2015
#101
"Your future is one where everybody and their uncle, aunt and child has a gun "
blueridge3210
Jul 2015
#106
Media Matters? Where Brock had his minions violate DC gun control laws so he could be protected?
Nuclear Unicorn
Jul 2015
#114
Truth is not an attack. Brock violated DC gun control laws to acquire and possess a gun.
Nuclear Unicorn
Jul 2015
#116
Still waiting for an answer to the questions. Or is deflection and poutrage all you have today?
Shamash
Jul 2015
#100
The law, as written by the NRA and gun death supporters, is a special Colorado carve out for only gun manufacturers...corruption pays.
Fred Sanders
Jul 2015
#9
So you are claiming that if I am hit by a stolen car, driven by a person running from the police
oneshooter
Jul 2015
#10
Yes, that is exactly what I mean, of course it is. Silly analogy. How about that special NRA gun manufacturer protection law?
Fred Sanders
Jul 2015
#11
You mean the law to prevent firearms manufacturers from being sued for the illegal use
oneshooter
Jul 2015
#15
Cars manufactured to kill people? Which company is doing that, I wanna see that LOL
randys1
Jul 2015
#78
Poor, poor babies, the gun manufacturers, being "harrassed", poor helpless babies needing special protection.
Fred Sanders
Jul 2015
#18
Welcome to Full Ignore #46.....gun lovers love gun manufacturers who need special legal protection from
Fred Sanders
Jul 2015
#24
"You really should help the Brady campaign lawyers." Perhaps he is already doing so
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2015
#8
The fact that the judiciary in gerrymandered Red states has become infested with RW extremists,
Fred Sanders
Jul 2015
#52
I could send a first year law student to defend the right of ammo in front of the supreme court
Travis_0004
Jul 2015
#63
"It amazes me how one side, can so turn it around, and use the other side's own money against them."
pablo_marmol
Jul 2015
#66
It's not hte for the victims but you know that. Any delight in loss is reserved strictly for the
Nuclear Unicorn
Jul 2015
#74
Who's to blame for DUIs, sexual assault and domestic violence? Alcohol distillers or the criminals?
Nuclear Unicorn
Jul 2015
#87
You know, I sort of knew I was wasting my time when I responded to that first post
tularetom
Jul 2015
#113
Seeing as you have demonstrated the lack of a functional definition for murder you
Nuclear Unicorn
Jul 2015
#86