Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

Showing Original Post only (View all)

virginia mountainman

(5,046 posts)
Wed Jun 24, 2015, 04:21 PM Jun 2015

The Brady campaign sued Lucky Gunner, attempting to "put them out of business".. [View all]

The judge made this statement in his ruling:

"It is apparent that this case was filed to pursue the political purposes of the Brady Center and, given the failure to present any cognizable legal claim, bringing these defendants [Lucky Gunner] into the Colorado court... appears to be more of an opportunity to propagandize the public and stigmatize the defendants than to obtain a court order."


So they naturally lost, and not only did they lose, they lost big, and they are appealing the case to a higher court too loose some more.. Now the Lucky Gunner, is going to donate 100% percent of the "Brady" money back into gun rights advocacy groups, and they have a poll on their website allowing visitors to vote to whom should they donate the Brady Campaign's money too..

It amazes me how one side, can so turn it around, and use the other side's own money against them.

http://www.luckygunner.com/brady-v-lucky-gunner

Just reporting the facts, without emotional embellishments for all to see.
130 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
To put an exact number on it, 203k is what the Brady campaign owes Travis_0004 Jun 2015 #1
I wonder if "Magic Mike" Bloomberg is going to cut a check? blueridge3210 Jun 2015 #2
Putting facts into the equation...the legal costs order was against the two parents of a gun slain child. Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #13
You should pay when you bring about a frivolous lawsuit Travis_0004 Jul 2015 #14
^^^^^THIS^^^^^ NaturalHigh Jul 2015 #47
Pray tell Shamash Jul 2015 #20
Boring and pathetically obtuse standard fare....Welcome to Ignore, #45. I grow weary of this common NRA-lover's tripe. Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #21
Ah, the "Ignore List" blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #22
You mean "lost the argument 45 times". Shamash Jul 2015 #28
Heh. blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #29
45 is quite the Ignore List. I think the last person to have a list that long was -- Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2015 #31
I grieve for those parents who lost their child. NaturalHigh Jul 2015 #41
Only "frivolous" because the law has been gerrymandered to favor gun factories. The law is being Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #42
Will not be overturned Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #43
"Wishful thinking" is about all the control fans seem to have left DonP Jul 2015 #44
truly amazing Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #45
I don't think you've thoroughly researched the facts of this case. NaturalHigh Jul 2015 #46
There are 340 million guns in America. Research completed....Conclusion: there are too many guns. Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #48
You would make quite a lawyer. Try taking that argument into court. NaturalHigh Jul 2015 #49
In a court not presided over by a RW gun nut Judge with RW gun nut laws, of course it is the most irrefutable argument Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #53
So TeddyR Jul 2015 #56
So- Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #58
Nonresponsive. (nt) blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #60
There are 340 million guns in America. blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #50
Please be more understanding of Fred's problems Shamash Jul 2015 #51
*** NaturalHigh Jul 2015 #54
Guns are the definition of tort lawsuits. LOL If we lived in a sane society, that is. randys1 Jul 2015 #76
Um, no, you would be wrong. blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #80
"This FACT is WHY the gun mfgs need laws to protect them. " beevul Jul 2015 #90
LOL randys1 Jul 2015 #92
The person on the side of reason, common sense and saving lives blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #93
Sorry again. beevul Jul 2015 #97
Quick questions for randys1 Shamash Jul 2015 #94
Wait, you get to call me a nut but I cant call you one LOL randys1 Jul 2015 #95
Non-responsive. (nt) blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #96
So you DO Get to call me a nut, guess what would happen if I called you a gun nut randys1 Jul 2015 #98
What would happen if someone on DU called me a gun nut? Around here, I'd call it Tuesday. Shamash Jul 2015 #99
My position is simple, really. Apart from the simple fact that the 2nd only allows for guns randys1 Jul 2015 #101
You must have missed a couple of USSC decisions blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #104
I can read...I know what the 2nd says randys1 Jul 2015 #105
"Your future is one where everybody and their uncle, aunt and child has a gun " blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #106
That's nice Shamash Jul 2015 #107
You are very angry, so my interaction with you will end after this post. randys1 Jul 2015 #108
*Sigh* blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #109
Media Matters? Where Brock had his minions violate DC gun control laws so he could be protected? Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2015 #114
Media Matters attacked at DU....LOL wow...amazing randys1 Jul 2015 #115
Truth is not an attack. Brock violated DC gun control laws to acquire and possess a gun. Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2015 #116
You are completely clueless Shamash Jul 2015 #117
Where did I call you a nut? blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #102
it was shamash randys1 Jul 2015 #103
Still waiting for an answer to the questions. Or is deflection and poutrage all you have today? Shamash Jul 2015 #100
Hey, PLCAA detractors... beevul Jun 2015 #3
just reporting 'his' facts jimmy the one Jun 2015 #4
I would expect the appellate judge blueridge3210 Jun 2015 #5
The law, as written by the NRA and gun death supporters, is a special Colorado carve out for only gun manufacturers...corruption pays. Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #9
So you are claiming that if I am hit by a stolen car, driven by a person running from the police oneshooter Jul 2015 #10
Yes, that is exactly what I mean, of course it is. Silly analogy. How about that special NRA gun manufacturer protection law? Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #11
You mean the law to prevent firearms manufacturers from being sued for the illegal use oneshooter Jul 2015 #15
Cars manufactured to kill people? Which company is doing that, I wanna see that LOL randys1 Jul 2015 #78
Having a gun designed to kill could be useful if confronted by a Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2015 #89
For a device that was not developed to "kill people" oneshooter Jul 2015 #110
Are you aware sarisataka Jul 2015 #12
When you attempt to ... MicaelS Jul 2015 #16
Um, no. You would be wrong. blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #17
Poor, poor babies, the gun manufacturers, being "harrassed", poor helpless babies needing special protection. Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #18
And suing businesses from manufacturers... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2015 #19
The gun manufacturers were being targeted by lawsuits blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #23
Welcome to Full Ignore #46.....gun lovers love gun manufacturers who need special legal protection from Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #24
The law was passed in response to blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #25
Watch it Mister! beevul Jul 2015 #32
Oh, noes! blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #33
I am on a couple of those lists Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #34
Yup. Clearly, it keeps you up at night........ blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #35
Started out HAWK Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #36
My middle son is a Army medic. oneshooter Jul 2015 #38
Cool Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #39
After he talked to me he called it"Sick, Lame and lazy call" oneshooter Jul 2015 #40
yeah, it is exciting when people get blown up and wounded... Human101948 Jul 2015 #84
Yes it can get that way, have you ever been in the weeds? oneshooter Jul 2015 #111
Have not slept in months, lol Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #37
"WMDs" Lizzie Poppet Jul 2015 #30
Not sure they were being "harrassed" TeddyR Jul 2015 #27
No shit. And yet what you are saying seems incomprehensible to some. randys1 Jul 2015 #79
The law in Colorado TeddyR Jul 2015 #26
You know Jimmy.. virginia mountainman Jun 2015 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author friendly_iconoclast Jun 2015 #7
"You really should help the Brady campaign lawyers." Perhaps he is already doing so friendly_iconoclast Jun 2015 #8
The fact that the judiciary in gerrymandered Red states has become infested with RW extremists, Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #52
Um, no. blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #55
UPDATE... They give up..... Time to write the check $$$$$$ ! virginia mountainman Jul 2015 #130
Common sense deathrind Jul 2015 #57
The First Amendment says nothing about printer's ink. blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #59
Ink =/= Ammo.... deathrind Jul 2015 #69
Ink = Ammo blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #72
You do realize.. virginia mountainman Jul 2015 #61
See my reply above. N/T deathrind Jul 2015 #68
I could send a first year law student to defend the right of ammo in front of the supreme court Travis_0004 Jul 2015 #63
Nice jump to conclusion. deathrind Jul 2015 #67
Aren't you the one who just said Shamash Jul 2015 #70
Free ammo Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #71
I'm sorta late to this thread and I really have not much to add except tularetom Jul 2015 #62
Stay tuned, the outcome is yet to come. Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #64
Sorry Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #65
"It amazes me how one side, can so turn it around, and use the other side's own money against them." pablo_marmol Jul 2015 #66
Why do some folks cheer on arms merchants when... stone space Jul 2015 #73
It's not hte for the victims but you know that. Any delight in loss is reserved strictly for the Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2015 #74
This is about hatred for gun victims, plain and simple. stone space Jul 2015 #75
Um, no, it's not about "hatred". blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #77
I don't hate anybody in the world... tularetom Jul 2015 #81
You can't blame anybody but the arms industry for their... stone space Jul 2015 #82
Are you reading things in reverse? beevul Jul 2015 #85
Who's to blame for DUIs, sexual assault and domestic violence? Alcohol distillers or the criminals? Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2015 #87
But, but, but............... blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #88
Nobody "attacked" the family of a victim tularetom Jul 2015 #91
He's back on time out. blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #112
You know, I sort of knew I was wasting my time when I responded to that first post tularetom Jul 2015 #113
I guess if you plan to time out yourself... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2015 #118
Wow, he didn't even last one day back? DonP Jul 2015 #119
Nope. blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #120
LMAO, looks like the religion and spirituality group is tired of him too Lurks Often Jul 2015 #121
Nope, GGJohn Jul 2015 #122
Wow 6, very impressive Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #123
Thanks. GGJohn Jul 2015 #124
I am sure Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #126
Wow, 2 hides within 10 minutes Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #125
Seeing as you have demonstrated the lack of a functional definition for murder you Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2015 #86
Not surprised that you **hatefully** twist my disdain for The Brady Bunch pablo_marmol Jul 2015 #83
not just gun hate Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #127
You are correct. pablo_marmol Jul 2015 #128
Yes Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #129
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»The Brady campaign sued L...»Reply #0