Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Well, he would be a subject matter expert on criminal use of firearms. (nt) blueridge3210 Jul 2014 #1
You mean a former employee who was fired back in April Bjorn Against Jul 2014 #2
He worked there before, during and after the crime friendly_iconoclast Jul 2014 #3
So do you expect every employer to monitor their employee's activities outside of work? Bjorn Against Jul 2014 #5
He wasn't fired immediately after the crime was revealed friendly_iconoclast Jul 2014 #7
I guess I should rephrase that, we don't know if it was immediate but it did happen shortly after Bjorn Against Jul 2014 #9
"Do you believe all employers should be held liable..." Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2014 #38
That is completely false. Bjorn Against Jul 2014 #40
orly? The daily google-dump is nothing more than an effort to highlight the misdeeds of one person Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2014 #41
He was still in their employ when he allegedly committed the crimes gejohnston Jul 2014 #4
He was fired. Period. He is no longer an employee, your subject line is false. Bjorn Against Jul 2014 #6
Fine. I'll happily stipulate that CeaseFire is no worse than the NRA friendly_iconoclast Jul 2014 #8
So you see no difference between firing a criminal and re-electing one? Bjorn Against Jul 2014 #10
CeaseFire is run by well-meaning ninnies, NRA's board is downright malevolent friendly_iconoclast Jul 2014 #11
Which criminals are on Everytown's board? Bjorn Against Jul 2014 #12
Everytown is Bloomberg and his employee Shannon Watts gejohnston Jul 2014 #13
I don't like everyone on the board, but that does not make them criminals. Bjorn Against Jul 2014 #15
some former members of MAIG gejohnston Jul 2014 #17
So former members, but no current members Bjorn Against Jul 2014 #19
their names were removed from the list once they were removed as mayors gejohnston Jul 2014 #24
So now you are a psychic that is predicting 4-5 crimes in the next year Bjorn Against Jul 2014 #25
I said probably based on historical trend gejohnston Jul 2014 #27
There's one crypto-fascist who liked to use his "own private army" friendly_iconoclast Jul 2014 #18
I am no fan of Bloomberg, but what crime has he been charged with? Bjorn Against Jul 2014 #20
I just showed you a few he's committed (not that he'll likely be charged with any) friendly_iconoclast Jul 2014 #23
He was still an employee after the arrest gejohnston Jul 2014 #14
He was fired three months ago shortly after the arrest Bjorn Against Jul 2014 #16
ever hear of the silver rule? gejohnston Jul 2014 #21
So in other words you have no evidence, only innuendo Bjorn Against Jul 2014 #22
That wouldn't make them competent employers would it? gejohnston Jul 2014 #26
I don't know tell me. Bjorn Against Jul 2014 #28
I don't think they were covering for him gejohnston Jul 2014 #29
So you now acknowledge there is no evidence of wrongdoing and they do some good work Bjorn Against Jul 2014 #30
No. gejohnston Jul 2014 #31
So tell me why their hiring practices were questionable? Bjorn Against Jul 2014 #32
perhaps gejohnston Jul 2014 #33
Are you saying they were unaware that he was involved in criminal activities Jenoch Jul 2014 #35
I am saying he had served his time Bjorn Against Jul 2014 #36
I was unaware this was a paid position. Jenoch Jul 2014 #37
Well I suppose we now know the real reason for his opposition to armed individuals. ileus Jul 2014 #34
A concern for occupational safety, it seems... friendly_iconoclast Jul 2014 #39
CF hires a lot of ex offenders jimmy the one Jul 2014 #42
how many are violent offenders out of the 25-30? gejohnston Jul 2014 #43
hoisted on your own petard again jimmy the one Jul 2014 #44
excluding those crimes punishable by imprisonment related to the regulation of business practices gejohnston Jul 2014 #48
children of nra members, safe jimmy the one Jul 2014 #45
Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander friendly_iconoclast Jul 2014 #46
What Nugent said gejohnston Jul 2014 #49
address your misconception like a man jimmy the one Jul 2014 #50
wasn't a misconception at all gejohnston Jul 2014 #55
why can't martha stewart have a gun jimmy the one Jul 2014 #51
key phrase gejohnston Jul 2014 #54
backpedaling jimmy the one Jul 2014 #57
more like mistaken with a different thread gejohnston Jul 2014 #59
the ego's self exoneration jimmy the one Jul 2014 #61
is it my lack of integrity or gejohnston Jul 2014 #62
Criminals LOVE gun control laws... shedevil69taz Jul 2014 #47
you mean criminals hate guncontrol laws jimmy the one Jul 2014 #52
a push jimmy the one Jul 2014 #53
I meant exactly what I said. shedevil69taz Jul 2014 #56
demonstrably untrue jimmy the one Jul 2014 #58
control efforts prevent approx. 30% of criminals or potential criminals from obtaining a gun or comm gejohnston Jul 2014 #60
"This is obviously & demonstrably untrue, criminals are forced to 'obey' when they can't circumvent. beevul Jul 2014 #63
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»CeaseFire employee/gang m...»Reply #47