Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

iverglas

(38,549 posts)
42. god it's thick around here
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 04:17 PM
Jan 2012

How many times do some things have to be explained, and how slowly?

Anyone who lives in the Americas is an "American".

People in the US are Americans. People in Cuba are Americans. People in Chile are Americans. These are the Americas; this is America. You in the United States of America share the Americas, America, with the rest of us, whether you like it or not.

If you have a better way of referring to someone who lives in / is a citizen of the United States of America than "USAmerican", feel free to propose it.

Meanwhile, I'll use the term that is in widespread use in English, French and Spanish -- and oh look, Portuguese ... German ...:

USAmerican
états-unien(ne) (from Etats-Unis, which you probably don't know is French for United States)
estadounidense (from Estados Unidos)
estadunidense
US-Amerikaner

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_for_United_States_citizens

Did google break when I wasn't looking?

It is no one's fault that a couple of centuries ago, a group of colonies decided to call themselves by a name that failed to distinguish them from other parts of their hemisphere. You live in the United States of America. There are other states, and other peoples and people, in America.


I think that is telling of opinion of anything not canadian.

Whatever it's supposedly telling, it ain't telling it to me, and I don't think it's telling it to anybody else, either.

arsenal.... ileus Jan 2012 #1
I'm glad those dangerous smugglers are off the street Glassunion Jan 2012 #2
I'm glad a bunch of old folks with loaded guns iverglas Jan 2012 #9
You seem a little peeved that it was 3 years. oneshooter Jan 2012 #13
you seem not to have had the courtesy iverglas Jan 2012 #21
He is but returning the your typical courtesies ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #23
oh, yeah, that's right iverglas Jan 2012 #24
Oh, the irony. mvccd1000 Jan 2012 #25
oh, if only you knew what you were talking about iverglas Jan 2012 #26
So what you are really saying is: Spoonman Jan 2012 #30
So what you're really saying is: iverglas Jan 2012 #31
"respectful discussion" Spoonman Jan 2012 #33
Amazing, isn't it? Maybe a free pass? nt SteveW Jan 2012 #51
I don't think anyone was talking about Canada's or Brazil's or Latvia's books... TPaine7 Jan 2012 #3
the law is the law! iverglas Jan 2012 #6
That's quite true. jeepnstein Jan 2012 #28
indeed iverglas Jan 2012 #29
Problem solved. jeepnstein Jan 2012 #32
An Arsenal? rl6214 Jan 2012 #4
I'll report you for the use Glassunion Jan 2012 #5
I guess you know that your last (?) rofl-wall was alerted? petronius Jan 2012 #7
I was on yhe jury. rrneck Jan 2012 #12
well that says it all iverglas Jan 2012 #16
Brevity is the soul of wit. rrneck Jan 2012 #17
Wasn't me... ellisonz Jan 2012 #20
Be polite now. These are Canadians and aparently do not oneshooter Jan 2012 #27
a few people are funny, but a whole country is sad. ileus Jan 2012 #8
"I'm glad I'm American." iverglas Jan 2012 #10
Let's rephrase that a little and see what it sounds like: friendly_iconoclast Jan 2012 #18
let's read the fucking post I had replied to iverglas Jan 2012 #22
Mexicans or gejohnston Jan 2012 #40
what the fucking fuck are you on about?? iverglas Jan 2012 #41
Are all Canadian women as foul mouthed as you are? oneshooter Jan 2012 #50
It's okay here; after all, it's just the 'gungeon.' nt SteveW Jan 2012 #52
Just look at her use of "USAmerican" rl6214 Jan 2012 #39
god it's thick around here iverglas Jan 2012 #42
Thats all well and good, but you still haven't answered the question. oneshooter Jan 2012 #54
I've read many times over the years, pipoman Jan 2012 #57
no, you haven't iverglas Jan 2012 #58
Wouldn't it be most correct... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2012 #59
wouldn't it be actually correct iverglas Jan 2012 #60
re: a deal discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2012 #61
gosh iverglas Jan 2012 #62
By extension... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2012 #63
Could we add pipoman Jan 2012 #64
take off! discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2012 #65
Laws on any topic should be reasonable, and applied fairly and judiciously petronius Jan 2012 #11
+1 Well said. nt. Starboard Tack Jan 2012 #14
this law comes to you from iverglas Jan 2012 #15
Ignorance of the law is no excuse... ellisonz Jan 2012 #19
We should just annex the west coast of Canada so we can get to Alaska unimpeded. AtheistCrusader Jan 2012 #34
I've always wondered why you didn't just do that ;) iverglas Jan 2012 #35
I think because last time you burned down the White House. AtheistCrusader Jan 2012 #36
and the 200th anniversary is upon us! iverglas Jan 2012 #38
"In 1814 we took a little trip, along with Col. Jackson down the mighty Mississip'" SteveW Jan 2012 #53
heh iverglas Jan 2012 #55
Hmm... Maybe we should fix that somehow? jeepnstein Jan 2012 #44
just don't put it to Clinton iverglas Jan 2012 #45
Sounds like they were going on a major crime spree up there. Remmah2 Jan 2012 #37
They must've been from that militia Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2012 #43
I disagree with Canada's gun laws ObamaFTW2012 Jan 2012 #46
stick to the NRA ball caps ;) iverglas Jan 2012 #47
Canadians need to work to free themselves from tyranny. ileus Jan 2012 #48
well, 60+% of those of us who voted iverglas Jan 2012 #49
That's not an arsenal. GreenStormCloud Jan 2012 #56
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»U.S. retirees busted at b...»Reply #42