Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Milwaukee Sheriff Calls for Citizens to Arms Themselves, 911 Sometimes Not a Good Option. [View all]jimmy the one
(2,708 posts)15. honor bound tho, cops are
School guard (1 post) 4. Police have neither the ability (for obvious reasons) nor the obligation (for legal ones) to "protect" individual citizens, regardless of what they have painted on their cars.
mtn man: the Police, are under NO DUTY to protect an individual that is NOT under their direct "care".
True, but you both leave the impression that they can refuse to respond to a reported crime, or cherry pick (ie by race) whom they respond to.
Police are not obligated to respond for pragmatic reasons - if they were able to be sued then victims would willy nilly sue them for any oversight committed, which would clog the court system as well as hamstring the cops by making them appear as witnesses, which would render a far less effective police dept.. Criminals would be instrumental in allowing this to happen btw, suing police depts for trivial or superficial reasons..
The police depts are not angels all the times, but this is one policy which needs to be.
On the other hand, it's sorta tacit most all cops are honor bound to respond, for if the cops did indeed refuse to respond to reported crimes they would either be fired, sanctioned, or called cowards.
That cops respond to reported crime is de facto, the 'not obligated' rule just a necessary legal imposition which doesn't mean they can cherry pick which crime to show up to.
.. false alarms too, why 911 screens needed.
Hmmm, 'school guard' with one post, on a gunboard; why am I inclined to think he/she, is pro gun?
mtn man: the Police, are under NO DUTY to protect an individual that is NOT under their direct "care".
True, but you both leave the impression that they can refuse to respond to a reported crime, or cherry pick (ie by race) whom they respond to.
Police are not obligated to respond for pragmatic reasons - if they were able to be sued then victims would willy nilly sue them for any oversight committed, which would clog the court system as well as hamstring the cops by making them appear as witnesses, which would render a far less effective police dept.. Criminals would be instrumental in allowing this to happen btw, suing police depts for trivial or superficial reasons..
The police depts are not angels all the times, but this is one policy which needs to be.
On the other hand, it's sorta tacit most all cops are honor bound to respond, for if the cops did indeed refuse to respond to reported crimes they would either be fired, sanctioned, or called cowards.
That cops respond to reported crime is de facto, the 'not obligated' rule just a necessary legal imposition which doesn't mean they can cherry pick which crime to show up to.
.. false alarms too, why 911 screens needed.
Hmmm, 'school guard' with one post, on a gunboard; why am I inclined to think he/she, is pro gun?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
30 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Milwaukee Sheriff Calls for Citizens to Arms Themselves, 911 Sometimes Not a Good Option. [View all]
GreenStormCloud
Jan 2013
OP
Police have neither the ability (for obvious reasons) nor the obligation (for legal ones) to
School guard
Jan 2013
#4
So I've heard. But we are paying them to at least make an effort. We aren't
kestrel91316
Jan 2013
#7
Correct... they will eventually arrive to investigate the murder of an individual...
iiibbb
Jan 2013
#13
That doesn't mean they will get there in time to prevent a violent crime from occurring. nt
hack89
Jan 2013
#19
David Clark is more interested in posting officers on the freeway where the
SWTORFanatic
Jan 2013
#28
I had a LTE published in the J.S. re Clarke for which I am now being harassed by a pro-gun blogger
HereSince1628
Jan 2013
#29