Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tuesday Afternoon

(56,912 posts)
9. I thought they already were. seems there have been threads about this before. that was, you know,
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 10:29 PM
Jan 2013

way back before ... sandy and aurora ...

Darn that pesky old Constitution anyway ... holdencaufield Jan 2013 #1
Help to protect the 7th Amendment. safeinOhio Jan 2013 #4
To drive on public roads, not simply to own a car. beevul Jan 2013 #7
Why is this different than a standard home liability insurance already? iiibbb Jan 2013 #2
Homeowner's insurance isn't required by law FBaggins Jan 2013 #3
Regulations you mention are usually the purview of the states Eleanors38 Jan 2013 #5
I don't think there is a need for this insurance, but... Hangingon Jan 2013 #6
I thought they already were. seems there have been threads about this before. that was, you know, Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2013 #9
For those on the strong gun control side of the debate, beware of unintended consequences .... spin Jan 2013 #8
I thought of that angle as well, but then I realized.... friendly_iconoclast Jan 2013 #10
Watching Wayne LaPierre recently I have to agree. ... spin Jan 2013 #11
Obama is really in their head iiibbb Jan 2013 #13
I am in favor of this. SQUEE Jan 2013 #12
The cost of gun violence is $175 billion per year. Privatizing profits while socializing losses. libdem4life Jan 2013 #14
correction gejohnston Jan 2013 #15
Ha...that's one mistake Spell Check misses...thanks. libdem4life Jan 2013 #16
Already is an insurance like that Jarhead1775 Jan 2013 #17
I thought so. Thank you. Wish I wasn't so lazy as to find the threads about it from earlier Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2013 #18
Some anti's are quite reasonable. iiibbb Jan 2013 #19
that they are death machines I don't argue --- that they are my right to have, own and Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2013 #23
"shall not be infringed" Francis Marion Jan 2013 #20
another nathan hale? jimmy the one Jan 2013 #21
It won't do what those advocates hope it will do. GreenStormCloud Jan 2013 #22
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Advocates Push Idea of Re...»Reply #9