Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: A proposal to change the rules regarding posting in this group [View all]Kaleva
(36,259 posts)110. The example of -..__...
Joined DU before July 6th 2003 and had 7,776 in total of which 62 posts were made in this group in the 90 days prior to his being banned by Admin on Jan 11, 2013 for posting shock content.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=profile&uid=127101
While he was a long time member with well over 1k posts, his transparency page was visible.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
145 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
No thanks. I feel the same way about this as I do about blocks - we don't need procedures,
petronius
Dec 2012
#3
usually I agree with you petronius but, I am tired of taking the heat for them and having my
Tuesday Afternoon
Jan 2013
#103
Disagree, but would support guidance for juries that include accusation as "right wing" "NRA troll"
jody
Dec 2012
#6
There was a recently PPR'd member who'd been here since 2003 but had less then 1k posts
Kaleva
Dec 2012
#13
Well if a troll doesn't post much then they're not much a disruption, are they?
OneTenthofOnePercent
Dec 2012
#24
If they get PPR'd they caused enough of a problem to attract the attention of Admin.
Kaleva
Dec 2012
#27
I'd like to hear your arguement as to how trolls, zombies, socks and such contribute to discussions.
Kaleva
Dec 2012
#39
krispos42 suggested I also post it in Meta so it'd be more likely Admin would see it.
Kaleva
Dec 2012
#12
Yes, I read about it a little earlier. I suspect that that one will be more to my tastes. (nt)
ehrenfeucht games
Dec 2012
#28
Why not just propose what you really want: Anyone who favors the 2nd Amendment should be
pop topcan
Dec 2012
#21
How about sticking to the rule of shitcanning those writing about "black control"?
Democracyinkind
Dec 2012
#36
GC/RKBA is the most trashed group and many people refuse to come here for a reason.
Kaleva
Dec 2012
#33
I don't know. I see what you're trying to achieve, but this group is what brought me to DU
aikoaiko
Dec 2012
#45
Wanting to have the same guns as the military has it pretty close to "no regulation at all"
Kaleva
Dec 2012
#47
Is that why they are gaining 8,000 members per day, since the shooting? N/T
GreenStormCloud
Dec 2012
#68
Cool! Te be able to attack 2A more efficiently let's just throw out 1A as well
alpine44
Dec 2012
#73
DU is not Congress. Here is the text of 1st Amendment. Private websites can and do have rules.
uppityperson
Dec 2012
#74
Are you talking about grandfathering in current people before imposing this nonsenes?
Dog Gone at Penigma
Jan 2013
#83
Making it easy for trolls to post here in GC/RKBA doesn't improve the discussion IMO.
Kaleva
Jan 2013
#113
However, as I pointed out in the OP, many avoid GC/RKBA now because of its reputation
Kaleva
Jan 2013
#115
It bears repeating: you are posting pro gun messages on a progressive liberal democratic forum.
Warren Stupidity
Jan 2013
#120
The TOS has to do with who gets evicted, why posts get hidden has to with
Warren Stupidity
Jan 2013
#123
I expect less hatred from liberals. Controllers do not dictate what is or is not liberal.
Eleanors38
Jan 2013
#122
If I follow, you get zotted (how many times?) for advocating gun-control in a civilized way on DU?
Eleanors38
Jan 2013
#138
Through the fog of your writing, I discerned the Free Republic. What makes you think I care about
Eleanors38
Jan 2013
#142
We all lose contenance as well, but we don't (hopefully) make a lifestyle of it,
Eleanors38
Jan 2013
#139
No one's forcing you to post NRA talking points on a progressive discussion board.
apocalypsehow
Jan 2013
#145