Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Important Anti-Gun Study Shown to be Flawed (if facts matter) [View all]DanTex
(20,709 posts)43. LOL. I'll take that as an admission that your OP is false.
Why else would you change the subject rather than try and defend your "facts"?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Important Anti-Gun Study Shown to be Flawed (if facts matter) [View all]
AnotherMcIntosh
Jan 2013
OP
Claim something is flawed but provide no examples, just say it's flawed. Fools will buy that.
Scuba
Jan 2013
#1
Err... except for the specific factual rebuttals that make up the entire post?
Recursion
Jan 2013
#4
There's a whole bunch of claims at the link, none of which refute the claim that ....
Scuba
Jan 2013
#19
If facts matter, a link was provided in the OP to Harvard School of Public Health article
AnotherMcIntosh
Jan 2013
#22
If facts matter, read the detailed analysis and open letter found with the links.
AnotherMcIntosh
Jan 2013
#5
If facts matter, on what basis do you claim that a Swiss citizen is "a right-wing blogger"?
AnotherMcIntosh
Jan 2013
#6
Just because some right-wing blogger claims the "facts" are on his side, doesn't make it so...
DanTex
Jan 2013
#8
If facts matter, on what basis do you claim that a Swiss citizen is "a right-wing blogger"?
AnotherMcIntosh
Jan 2013
#9
The blogger *quotes the published facts* that the study author misrepresented
Recursion
Jan 2013
#13
Yeah, and the blogger thinks her own interpretation of the statistics is fair and balanced,
DanTex
Jan 2013
#21
You have not shown at this or any other time that the blogger is a "right-wing blogger."
AnotherMcIntosh
Jan 2013
#24
Sorry, but "leftism/statism" are right-wing buzzwords, as much as you would like to deny it.
DanTex
Jan 2013
#29
You have not shown at this or any other time that the blogger is a "right-wing blogger."
AnotherMcIntosh
Jan 2013
#34
On what factual basis do you say the blog "seems to be from a right-wing American"?
AnotherMcIntosh
Jan 2013
#33
A blogger is not a "right-wing blogger" when they post that they are in favor of
AnotherMcIntosh
Jan 2013
#16
There are no facts to support your statment that "there are going to be fifty anonymous blog entries
AnotherMcIntosh
Jan 2013
#31
Well, the blog has two authors, one of whom is a woman and one of whom refuses to state
Recursion
Jan 2013
#17
What about sticking with the facts instead of engaging in name calling?
AnotherMcIntosh
Jan 2013
#35
As pointed out by Scuba above, the blogger doesn't actually seem to dispute the central facts.
DanTex
Jan 2013
#39
You are still ignoring the facts. Your blogger friend doesn't actually dispute the study.
DanTex
Jan 2013
#41
You're as illogical as ever. Your posts certainly show that you're an expert as changing the subject
AnotherMcIntosh
Jan 2013
#44
Pretty thin gruel there, Dan. I think she summed up your attack pretty well.
Eleanors38
Jan 2013
#18
If the Swiss author of the Dec 2012 article and open letter used sarcasm or otherwise
AnotherMcIntosh
Jan 2013
#28
"Here in Switzerland we resent being pressed into forced labor in the salt mines...
Recursion
Jan 2013
#3