Drug Policy

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)

14. it is indeed a very tough road to walk - if you are a federal

Tue May 8, 2012, 09:46 PM

May 2012

officer and you cannot get the local cops to support you.

And believe me, here in Northern Calif.; even the sheriffs are pissed at the DOJ and the other entities that are taking apart the medial marijuana clinics.

Obama's DOJ looks corrupt when they do this type of thing. One of the only groups benefiting from taking apart what the state voters decided upon are the Mexican cartels. Does Obama really want credit for aiding and abetting the cartels?

The entire summer of 2011, every time I picked up a newspaper in Northern calif., there was yet another news story about another police group praising the fact due to local tax revenue produced by the medical marijuana clinics, police were able to retain their trained officers and their pension funds. And school kids got to keep more of their teachers.

Since Obama was not that interested in California's economic plight, letting Tim Geithner refuse us a 20 billion dollar friggin' loan, he really should stay the way out of our local remedies to both our illnesses and our economic distress.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

28 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

U.S. Supreme Court: Federal Law Does Not Pre-empt State MMJ Law [View all] RainDog May 2012 OP

What next? Gay marriage? MannyGoldstein May 2012 #1

Now if we can just get the feds to quit ignoring state laws. Lionessa May 2012 #2

Sadly, this administration shares that knack with its predecessors villager May 2012 #3

The executive branch and Congress need to respond to the will of the American people RainDog May 2012 #4

i agree but not because a majority of people, that's a slippery slope I won't go near. Lionessa May 2012 #5

I agree - but the reason a majority want the law to change is because of the science RainDog May 2012 #6

Well we hope that's the reason, but in the end it doesn't matter, Lionessa May 2012 #7

Since the govt can no longer control information about this topic RainDog May 2012 #9

Thanks for fighting the good fight RainDog. iscooterliberally May 2012 #24

thanks for those kind words RainDog May 2012 #26

That's pretty much what Arizona is arguing at the SC in regard to SB1070 CactusJak May 2012 #8

Yes, however the OPs title is inaccurate. Fed law does outrank State law for Lionessa May 2012 #10

it is indeed a very tough road to walk - if you are a federal truedelphi May 2012 #14

Arizona is arguing against human rights RainDog May 2012 #11

You say: truedelphi May 2012 #15

here's a link RainDog May 2012 #16

I see this as a win for human rights, not because of the origin of the law. I'm encouraged by it. freshwest May 2012 #12

Same hear. And a big shout out to raindog for truedelphi May 2012 #13

It's from Dec. 2011 RainDog May 2012 #17

I'd have never known if you hadn't. This is the first I heard. Thanks! freshwest May 2012 #20

Misleading headline -- Actually, as stated in the story, "The U.S. Supreme Court REFUSED TO REVIEW AnotherMcIntosh May 2012 #18

Excuse me but doesn't the USSC refusal to review a case mean bupkus May 2012 #21

Of course that's what that means. In contrast, it does not mean (as improperly implied by the AnotherMcIntosh May 2012 #23

Does This Mean DallasNE May 2012 #19

Federal agencies can make arrests in states. RainDog May 2012 #22

Even though Meiko May 2012 #25

Do you know that Arizona has had to vote for the same law three times? RainDog May 2012 #27

kick b/c I'm so pissed at what is going on now. n/t RainDog Dec 2012 #28