HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Gender & Orientation » Feminists (Group) » Should the children remov... » Reply #7

Reply #7


Response to kdmorris (Reply #6)

Tue May 29, 2012, 10:35 AM

7. That's one of the problems with this case.

We DON'T KNOW how many times or IF the father hit the kids as well as my client. The only ones who know the truth are my client, her ex-husband, and the kids. What if my client truly didn't see the kids getting hit because they weren't hit? By that I mean, they were given an allowed swat on the behind or they weren't "beaten"? My skepticism is heightened as I believe my client and she said she never saw marks, scars, welts, bruises, swellings, lacerations, redness, etc. on any of the children that were noteworthy when she bathed them. She was strangled BECAUSE she was going to the aid of a crying child whom she suspected was "hit" by his father. He jumped up and strangled her.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 16 replies Author Time Post
no_hypocrisy May 2012 OP
peacebird May 2012 #1
no_hypocrisy May 2012 #2
Stargazer09 May 2012 #4
BlueToTheBone May 2012 #3
WingDinger May 2012 #5
kdmorris May 2012 #6
LineLineNew Reply That's one of the problems with this case.
no_hypocrisy May 2012 #7
kdmorris May 2012 #8
no_hypocrisy May 2012 #9
no_hypocrisy May 2012 #10
Catherina May 2012 #11
Marrah_G Jun 2012 #14
CreekDog Jun 2012 #16
LeftyMom Jun 2012 #12
no_hypocrisy Jun 2012 #13
Warren DeMontague Jun 2012 #15
Please login to view edit histories.