In the discussion thread: Everything you ever wanted to know about the 9/11 conspiracy theory in under 5 minutes [View all]
Response to KDLarsen (Reply #10)
Sat Dec 17, 2011, 11:24 AM
FourScore (8,181 posts)
15. This is true and deserves correcting. I genuinely apologize
for saying you try to discredit the poster when what I meant to say is that it appears as though you spend a lot of time trying to discredit 9-11 "truther" posts.
There is a group of about 7 DU posters who have spent years here in the 9-11 forum arguing with those who question the "official conspiracy theory". I just think it is very odd. You may or may not be one of those who spends a great deal of time and energy arguing about 9-11, I don't know. But we all know who the usual argumentative ones are.
If someone posts something about Chemtrails, I think they are wrong. But I don't spend years of my life making the same arguments against it. I just let it go. So what's the motive behind those who spend their time for years on end arguing every 9-11 post that appears on this board. I know I don't have that much time on my hands -- which is why I refuse to hash through the same arguments over and over. That's what I was referring to.
Nevertheless, I'd like to reiterate, I feel certain that you have never attacked anyone personally. That (very careless) comment of mine not only deserves a correction, but also an apology.
"Politics is like driving. To go backward put it in R. To go forward put it in D."
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
|Ghost in the Machine||Dec 2011||#2|
|T S Justly||Dec 2011||#3|
|Bolo Boffin||Dec 2011||#8|
This is true and deserves correcting. I genuinely apologize
|Richard Charnin||Dec 2011||#19|
|Bolo Boffin||Dec 2011||#24|
Please login to view edit histories.