Reply #49

In the discussion thread: OK then. Just the facts. 9-11 [View all]

Sat Mar 3, 2012, 02:50 PM

libodem (12,133 posts)

49. So amazing...after all these years

Yes, it's true. Get your tickets here. I really went through hell for my creative speculation, that night. I don't know why I pushed my theory back then. I thought it up and said it and he went out of his rabid ass mind. I was terrorized although not physically touched.

Believe me I never brought it up with him again. Although I think about it now and wonder if he hears real things like what are posted at the top of the thread.

Please don't let my goofy antidote derail an awesome discussion.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

85 replies	Author	Time	Post
OK then. Just the facts. 9-11 [View all]	cbrer	Feb 2012	OP
I stopped at #1.	zappaman	Feb 2012	#1
actually it doesn't weaken steel	Rosa Luxemburg	Feb 2012	#30
Did I use the wrong word?	zappaman	Feb 2012	#31
Facts? These questions show that you've already been bamboozled	William Seger	Feb 2012	#2
Pancake theory leaves	Politicalboi	Mar 2012	#63
Nonsense will never change my mind, but actual evidence certainly would.	William Seger	Mar 2012	#67
I would really like to know what you believe to be the relevance of point 1	jberryhill	Feb 2012	#3
Not completely	cbrer	Feb 2012	#4
Keep up the inquiry, please.	earcandle	Feb 2012	#5
"Conflicting data"?	William Seger	Feb 2012	#6
Indubitably (sp?)	cbrer	Feb 2012	#7
If you don't have the background to wade through the equations used...	AZCat	Feb 2012	#8
Not asking for defense	cbrer	Feb 2012	#10
If you could apply the laws of physics to 9/11 as you claim, you	LARED	Feb 2012	#13
Uh... Yes, you did.	AZCat	Feb 2012	#15
I stand corrected	cbrer	Feb 2012	#17
Have you read the NIST NCSTARs?	AZCat	Feb 2012	#22
If you "don't have the background to wade through the equations"...	William Seger	Feb 2012	#23
Those curves are typical...	jberryhill	Feb 2012	#9
Steel	cbrer	Feb 2012	#11
No one has told you to STFU	jberryhill	Feb 2012	#12
I need to start using the sarcasm emoticon	cbrer	Feb 2012	#14
"Lots of conflicting information by credible sources exist"	jberryhill	Feb 2012	#34
Google	cbrer	Feb 2012	#20
I misremembered the name	jberryhill	Feb 2012	#24
Thanks for the link	cbrer	Feb 2012	#25
This is pure nonsense....	jberryhill	Feb 2012	#33
Maybe you can answer this for me then	BobbyBoring	Mar 2012	#54
And your explanation for that is....?	jberryhill	Mar 2012	#57
Here's one	BobbyBoring	Mar 2012	#58
Yes, David Chandler is a kook	William Seger	Feb 2012	#16
Potential yes, but...	cbrer	Feb 2012	#18
"... is shown to have been in constant downward acceleration until it disappeared."	William Seger	Feb 2012	#26
He states that it's in the video.	cbrer	Feb 2012	#27
I meant "shown" as in "demonstrated conclusively"	William Seger	Feb 2012	#28
Thanks	cbrer	Feb 2012	#29
Two weeks have passed and still no response, even	LARED	Mar 2012	#45
Weak assed effort	cbrer	Mar 2012	#46
Here is what I am seriously suggesting	LARED	Mar 2012	#50
An open mind	cbrer	Mar 2012	#53
Honestly is appreciated nt	LARED	Mar 2012	#62
I'll quibble with #4	OnTheOtherHand	Mar 2012	#59
Quibble noted	LARED	Mar 2012	#61
seems fair, although personally I would avoid legal terms of art	OnTheOtherHand	Mar 2012	#70
nice post -- I'll just point out a recurring typo	OnTheOtherHand	Feb 2012	#32
And...	cbrer	Feb 2012	#19
For someone who claims to be curious, why have you not read any critical analysis of this POS?	jberryhill	Feb 2012	#35
Partial link- sorry	cbrer	Feb 2012	#21
"2. Timing does show some free fall throughout collapse of towers."	jberryhill	Feb 2012	#36
As I previously noted	cbrer	Feb 2012	#37
It doesn't require any particular expertise...	jberryhill	Feb 2012	#38
You were able	cbrer	Feb 2012	#39
No, you are not seeking information	jberryhill	Feb 2012	#40
here's the thing	OnTheOtherHand	Feb 2012	#41
Based on sources cited here	cbrer	Mar 2012	#47
"Please read these quotes and comment as to veracity."	jberryhill	Mar 2012	#51
My little personal story	libodem	Mar 2012	#42
I don't understand	zappaman	Mar 2012	#43
I know it is silly	libodem	Mar 2012	#48
"a bunch of nomads and a camel"	jberryhill	Mar 2012	#52
yes and no	OnTheOtherHand	Mar 2012	#60
Finally!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!	BobbyBoring	Mar 2012	#55
I would have got it a lot sooner	zappaman	Mar 2012	#56
Well...	terrafirma	Mar 2012	#44
So amazing...after all these years	libodem	Mar 2012	#49
Lobby windows blown out	Politicalboi	Mar 2012	#64
Situational evidence	cbrer	Mar 2012	#68
You can add two more indicators of an inside job....	Mr. Skeptik	Mar 2012	#69
huh?	OnTheOtherHand	Mar 2012	#71
Sure,	Mr. Skeptik	Mar 2012	#73
Nonsense	William Seger	Mar 2012	#74
darn it, you type too fast!	OnTheOtherHand	Mar 2012	#76
I guess it depends...	William Seger	Mar 2012	#78
yeah, it's easy to end up making people's arguments for them	OnTheOtherHand	Mar 2012	#81
seriously?	OnTheOtherHand	Mar 2012	#75
lots of odd assertions here	OnTheOtherHand	Mar 2012	#72
Oh and	Politicalboi	Mar 2012	#65
Oh boy, such nonsense	sgsmith	Mar 2012	#66
This thread is a hoot!!!	Broderick	Mar 2012	#77
I was hoping	cbrer	Mar 2012	#79
Have you drank too much	Broderick	Mar 2012	#80
you're not familiar with "formulae"?	OnTheOtherHand	Mar 2012	#82
chime in about what? I'm confused	OnTheOtherHand	Mar 2012	#83
No reason	cbrer	Mar 2012	#84
yes, there is a lot to be learned (or that can be learned)	OnTheOtherHand	Mar 2012	#85

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.