Creative Speculation

noise

(2,392 posts)

14. Meaning what?

Thu Feb 16, 2012, 03:58 AM

Feb 2012

The thread isn't about the content of the movie. It's about the media's coverage in regard to all things 9/11 related.

As I posted: "Is it too soon? Too traumatic? Exploitative?" These were the aspects being discussed by the media in relation to the movie.

IMO the media has gotten a pass on their 9/11 coverage. Lared's comment was a good example as he equated criticism of the media with truther nonsense. I don't know why anyone would defend 60 Minutes' reporting.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The pathetic coverage of the media in regard to Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close [View all] noise Feb 2012 OP

The media is just doing it's job zeemike Feb 2012 #1

I saw plenty of reviews hack89 Feb 2012 #2

134 critics reviewed it zappaman Feb 2012 #3

There wasn't a lack of coverage noise Feb 2012 #5

Apparently pathetic = disagrees with LARED Feb 2012 #7

Not at all noise Feb 2012 #8

This has NOTHING to do with the movie. zappaman Feb 2012 #9

The same media worried about noise Feb 2012 #10

"exploitative" zappaman Feb 2012 #11

No n/t noise Feb 2012 #12

Yeah, I thought not. n/t zappaman Feb 2012 #13

Meaning what? noise Feb 2012 #14

that is their patented modus operandi NoMoreWarNow Mar 2012 #18

"well sourced allegations of an obstructed al Qaeda investigation" Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #4

It's impossible noise Feb 2012 #6

Perhaps it began with JFK ... GeorgeGist Mar 2012 #15

You give them too much credit noise Mar 2012 #16

+1, n/t RKP5637 Mar 2012 #17

This message was self-deleted by its author Keso_77 Apr 2012 #19