Reply #26

In the discussion thread: Cutter Charges in the North Tower... [View all]

Response to jesters (Reply #25)

Tue Jan 3, 2012, 05:41 PM

zappaman (8,331 posts)

26. more importantly

where is your evidence they were?

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

73 replies	Author	Time	Post
Cutter Charges in the North Tower... [View all]	wildbilln864	Dec 2011	OP
and a kick! nt	wildbilln864	Dec 2011	#1
FDNY firefighters...	wildbilln864	Jan 2012	#2
NIST explains them as pressurized puffs of air	gyroscope	Jan 2012	#3
so you can tell from that picture that the puff is "exiting out of a single window"?	zappaman	Jan 2012	#4
Since they are actually explosives	gyroscope	Jan 2012	#5
how and when exactly	sabbat hunter	Mar 2012	#60
"they would be blowing out of ALL the windows of the floor" - No.	Bolo Boffin	Jan 2012	#6
So this 'jetting material' just happens to resemble	gyroscope	Jan 2012	#7
As I explained, they do NOT resemble precisely timed explosions	Bolo Boffin	Jan 2012	#8
Do you require glasses?	gyroscope	Jan 2012	#11
Please stop the sarcasm.	Bolo Boffin	Jan 2012	#12
Why would they need to cut the outer walls?	hack89	Jan 2012	#17
there were in fact a lot of renovations going on in the towers	NoMoreWarNow	Apr 2012	#68
Feel free to back this up with some evidence. nt	hack89	Apr 2012	#69
are you saying there weren't a lot of renovations going on?	NoMoreWarNow	Apr 2012	#70
But you haven't found it yet: keep looking. That link proves NOTHING. n/t.	apocalypsehow	Jun 2012	#71
LOL!	Politicalboi	Mar 2012	#65
"But of course I'm the nut."	zappaman	Mar 2012	#66
This post was hidden by jury decision.	The Great Haku	Jun 2012	#72
thanks for posting this! nt	wildbilln864	Jul 2012	#73
.	jesters	Jan 2012	#9
There are reports of the air blowing down much further than that during the collapse.	Bolo Boffin	Jan 2012	#10
Something else they can't to explain	gyroscope	Jan 2012	#14
See my post #15 nt	hack89	Jan 2012	#16
When the volume of a single floor went from 400K cubic feet to zero in fractions of seconds	hack89	Jan 2012	#15
So these 'puffs of air' as you call them	gyroscope	Jan 2012	#18
Do you understand compression?	hack89	Jan 2012	#19
Compression requires an airtight seal.	gyroscope	Jan 2012	#20
No, it doesn't.	AZCat	Jan 2012	#21
"the installation of the charges took place at night and/or on the weekends when people weren't work	zappaman	Jan 2012	#22
There was video	Politicalboi	Mar 2012	#51
"There was video"	zappaman	Mar 2012	#53
The WTC was a sealed building - all the windows were closed	hack89	Jan 2012	#23
No.	jesters	Jan 2012	#24
Because of where the elevator and HVAC shafts terminated?	hack89	Jan 2012	#28
maybe you and gyroscope can settle this and then get back to the rest of us	OnTheOtherHand	Jan 2012	#29
the 'puffs' come out of the windows in regular demolitions - see	Rosa Luxemburg	Mar 2012	#56
But the venting in the WTC buildings don't "puff," they jet	Bolo Boffin	Mar 2012	#62
Why weren't the plotters smart enough to put the cutter chargers	hack89	Jan 2012	#13
There would have been some destructive devices along the core. Obviously.	jesters	Jan 2012	#25
more importantly	zappaman	Jan 2012	#26
Why would they need them on the exterior walls?	hack89	Jan 2012	#27
Simple.	gyroscope	Jan 2012	#30
So a table can stand with only two legs on one side?	hack89	Jan 2012	#31
Don't you forget what you said	gyroscope	Jan 2012	#32
So if you "need all four 'legs' to hold the table up"	hack89	Jan 2012	#33
But it wont come straight down	gyroscope	Jan 2012	#34
If the core of the tower collapses straight down while the perimeter remains stationary	hack89	Jan 2012	#35
So you agree that the core sank first.	jesters	Jan 2012	#36
Too many damaged columns further weakened by fire	hack89	Jan 2012	#37
Lol.	jesters	Jan 2012	#38
The professional building community has been discussing these issues for some time.	AZCat	Jan 2012	#39
You do understand why highrises have fireproofing and sprinkler systems?	hack89	Jan 2012	#40
Lol.	jesters	Jan 2012	#41
Only one needed to sag.	hack89	Jan 2012	#42
Hack says that "Buildings are not designed with vertical static loads in mind."	jesters	Jan 2012	#43
Levitation?	gyroscope	Jan 2012	#46
Sorry - meant vertical dynamic loads. Now answer my question. nt	hack89	Jan 2012	#49
The fires weren't massive	Politicalboi	Mar 2012	#52
He was right at the edge of fire and below the impact floor	hack89	Mar 2012	#57
The inner core isn't going to give very easily if at all	gyroscope	Jan 2012	#44
"it doesn't work without removing the resistance. "	jesters	Jan 2012	#45
Maybe I'll start my own CD company	gyroscope	Jan 2012	#47
You cut out a big chunk of the core	hack89	Jan 2012	#48
I seem to recall...	ryan_cats	Mar 2012	#58
LOL!	Politicalboi	Mar 2012	#50
It's a trip back in the time machine	LARED	Mar 2012	#54
Amazing, right?	zappaman	Mar 2012	#55
Do we now have a magic smoke theory?	ryan_cats	Mar 2012	#63
Good one, Bill	jberryhill	Mar 2012	#59
I'm glad you're proud!	wildbilln864	Mar 2012	#61
Riddle me this, billman...	cherokeeprogressive	Mar 2012	#64
kick! nt	wildbilln864	Apr 2012	#67

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.