Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Israel/Palestine
Showing Original Post only (View all)After Paris, Whither the BDS Movement? [View all]
Showing no empathy and spinning crazy theories, Israels fiercest critics show that its Jews, not the Jewish state, they despise
==========
...Instead of the sort of empathy youd expect any sane person to express at a moment like this, the most vocal proponents of the BDS movement took radically different paths. Jewish Voice for Peace, for example, one of the leading radical leftist organizations focused on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, published a blog post that indicated precisely where its priorities lay. Entitled The Paris Murders & the Islamophobic Backlash, it contained many wise observations like the one alerting readers that Muslims are at greatly heightened risk from the forces of bigotry, but almost nothing about the fact that other forces, no less bigoted, had just taken the lives of 17 people, many of them Jewish. Even if you subscribe to the moronic theory that believes the concrete threat to be not the men with the semiautomatic weapons but some future affront to somebodys feelings, you can still take more than half a sentence to express genuine sadness at the thought of so many wasted lives. JVP had no time for such normal, human sentiments; nor did many others who make assailing Israel their cause. Writing in Mondoweiss, for example, and never once mentioning Jewsquite a feat, considering that one of the attacks took place in a kosher supermarketChloe Patton argued that we westerners needed to embrace the ways in which the historical traumas of the global south continue to haunt the postcolonial present. Even without judging the intellectual merit of such an argument, its not too hard to see that one thing that makes it particularly vile is that it assumes that only one side has any right to a hearing, while the other, even when slaughtered, ought to do nothing but listen and empathize.
Such uncaring, coming at this particular moment from anyone professing to be an activist working on behalf of universal values is deafening. As it happens, however, it beats the alternative.....
....To those among us unfortunate enough to follow the BDS movement closely, such vitriol is no news. But cataclysmic events have a way of rattling people into sudden awakenings. And so heres a simple suggestion: before you engage in conversation with critics of Israel, take a moment and check their digital footprint from the past week. If theyve taken the time and the trouble to condemn these horrific murders without equivocation, if they sound genuinely remorseful, proceed. But if all they can muster are musty cliches or steely dogmas, if they cant take a moment away from their politics to be ordinary, feeling humans, and if they cant miss an opportunity to see even this tragedy as yet another proof of the exceptional nefariousness of the Israeli regime, then theyve proven that the true object of their vitriol is not the Jewish state but the Jewish people.
==========
...Instead of the sort of empathy youd expect any sane person to express at a moment like this, the most vocal proponents of the BDS movement took radically different paths. Jewish Voice for Peace, for example, one of the leading radical leftist organizations focused on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, published a blog post that indicated precisely where its priorities lay. Entitled The Paris Murders & the Islamophobic Backlash, it contained many wise observations like the one alerting readers that Muslims are at greatly heightened risk from the forces of bigotry, but almost nothing about the fact that other forces, no less bigoted, had just taken the lives of 17 people, many of them Jewish. Even if you subscribe to the moronic theory that believes the concrete threat to be not the men with the semiautomatic weapons but some future affront to somebodys feelings, you can still take more than half a sentence to express genuine sadness at the thought of so many wasted lives. JVP had no time for such normal, human sentiments; nor did many others who make assailing Israel their cause. Writing in Mondoweiss, for example, and never once mentioning Jewsquite a feat, considering that one of the attacks took place in a kosher supermarketChloe Patton argued that we westerners needed to embrace the ways in which the historical traumas of the global south continue to haunt the postcolonial present. Even without judging the intellectual merit of such an argument, its not too hard to see that one thing that makes it particularly vile is that it assumes that only one side has any right to a hearing, while the other, even when slaughtered, ought to do nothing but listen and empathize.
Such uncaring, coming at this particular moment from anyone professing to be an activist working on behalf of universal values is deafening. As it happens, however, it beats the alternative.....
....To those among us unfortunate enough to follow the BDS movement closely, such vitriol is no news. But cataclysmic events have a way of rattling people into sudden awakenings. And so heres a simple suggestion: before you engage in conversation with critics of Israel, take a moment and check their digital footprint from the past week. If theyve taken the time and the trouble to condemn these horrific murders without equivocation, if they sound genuinely remorseful, proceed. But if all they can muster are musty cliches or steely dogmas, if they cant take a moment away from their politics to be ordinary, feeling humans, and if they cant miss an opportunity to see even this tragedy as yet another proof of the exceptional nefariousness of the Israeli regime, then theyve proven that the true object of their vitriol is not the Jewish state but the Jewish people.
http://tabletmag.com/jewish-news-and-politics/188290/bds-after-paris
Ain't that the truth?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
50 replies, 6331 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
50 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The purpose of the "apartheid" blood libel is to incite hatred and violence.
Fozzledick
Jan 2015
#17
What I don't care for are your moving goal posts and self victimization.
R. Daneel Olivaw
Jan 2015
#32
"Victimization? You don't believe the Jews murdered in France are victims?"
R. Daneel Olivaw
Jan 2015
#34
Well, since I didn't write the things that you said I did I guess that you are a bad individual.
R. Daneel Olivaw
Jan 2015
#40
Western Nations are lazy, shira. It took a while for South Africa to be labeled an apartheid state.
R. Daneel Olivaw
Jan 2015
#35