Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

delrem

(9,688 posts)
21. There are nuances.
Sat Feb 2, 2013, 10:23 PM
Feb 2013

The European and NA countries have graduated toward democracy *for themselves*, but even within those strictures only for segregated parts of themselves while remaining inertly complacent about gross inequalities until at point after point that complacency has been rudely interrupted. E.g. the struggle of Susan B. Anthony. But at the same time these proto- and semi-democracies have been enforcing and exploiting imperialist dictatorships over the people of other countries, raiding their resources and justifying the lot of it with some admirable spin.

The *ideas* of democracy and human rights belong to *reason*, not to countries. Instances can only be verified in situ and case by case. E.g. the USA can rightly call itself very democratic and rightly claim that it is an example of democracy, but it cannot rightly say that it has been "spreading democracy and freedom" throughout Central and South America, and the Far and Near East - except in very isolated instances ann argument might be made that some good came of it all. The USA might *say* it has, but in point of fact it hasn't -- and to the contrary it has contributed to the military overthrow of some democracies and in the case of Chile this was blatantly and self-righteously so (I believe it was Kissinger who said something awful about the innate goodness of the US saving the poor fools from their democratic selves).

As far as I can see the US has never come to terms with this history, and until it does IMO both it and its citizens should just STFU about how it should or could act in all its self-evident moral righteousness as "policeman of the world".

Hezbollah is a terrorist organization Animal Chin Feb 2013 #1
From the article R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2013 #2
I read the "article" Animal Chin Feb 2013 #3
"Israel did not "attack a foreign country. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2013 #4
I wasn't being disingenuous Animal Chin Feb 2013 #9
"Israel did not 'attack a foreign country.'" R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2013 #10
Here, let me put it together for you. Scootaloo Feb 2013 #11
No, they didn't. aranthus Feb 2013 #5
972mag on the loose! oberliner Feb 2013 #6
Does it bother you from what sources some post? R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2013 #7
Some, but not others Scootaloo Feb 2013 #8
What borders? nt bemildred Feb 2013 #12
Riiiiiiiiiight... R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2013 #13
try this.. pelsar Feb 2013 #14
It is truly laughable how you fly back and forth so R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2013 #15
You have to remember . . . another_liberal Feb 2013 #16
Western Democracy is vastly superior to Totalitarianism. shira Feb 2013 #17
We are good . . . another_liberal Feb 2013 #18
Are you under the impression "they" are the people languishing under.... shira Feb 2013 #19
You are right . . . another_liberal Feb 2013 #20
There are nuances. delrem Feb 2013 #21
The U.S. has enjoyed . . . another_liberal Feb 2013 #23
Carrots and Sticks in exchange for freedoms in every country. shira Feb 2013 #22
Yes, I largely agree . . . another_liberal Feb 2013 #24
moral superiority....? pelsar Feb 2013 #25
you missed the point..... pelsar Feb 2013 #26
Try rereading what I wrote. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2013 #27
self defense..... pelsar Feb 2013 #28
Your last solid paragraph tries to justify illegal behavior R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2013 #29
my argument is thats the norm...just ask obama pelsar Feb 2013 #30
I know that is your argument, and killing is dead wrong. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2013 #31
i'm arguing the standard....that is a argument pelsar Feb 2013 #32
I would rather have a "simplistic morality" as you put it than R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2013 #33
thats great for the "arm chair" variety of moralists pelsar Feb 2013 #35
See post 33. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2013 #36
not much of an answer...... pelsar Feb 2013 #37
Most of your responses in this thread have been "non-answers". Solindsey Feb 2013 #38
what are the "true Consequences" pelsar Feb 2013 #39
Consequences are real. Who knows it better than Israel when they inflicts so much of it? Solindsey Feb 2013 #40
disproportionate? pelsar Feb 2013 #41
Why do you make something so simple seem so damn complicated? Solindsey Feb 2013 #42
This discussion reminds me of a recent discussion in the Washington Post. delrem Feb 2013 #43
its called the "ticking bomb scenario" pelsar Feb 2013 #45
its called "BS". delrem Feb 2013 #46
buses are exploding by sucide bombers.... pelsar Feb 2013 #48
Probably more fickle than flexible. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2013 #52
because it is complicated....i'll give u an example.... pelsar Feb 2013 #44
bullshit. delrem Feb 2013 #47
too much information?...too difficult a decision? pelsar Feb 2013 #49
It's you who fails to answer. delrem Feb 2013 #50
whats the question.....just clarify pelsar Feb 2013 #51
It's you who claims to "know" delrem Feb 2013 #53
like i wrote... pelsar Feb 2013 #54
You have a terrible reading comprehension problem. n/t delrem Feb 2013 #55
yep I agree Israel refuses to declare it's borders on its eastern front azurnoir Feb 2013 #34
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»It seems Israel just pick...»Reply #21