Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Israel/Palestine
In reply to the discussion: Israel Official Says Gaza Militants Getting Anti-Aircraft Missiles From Libyan War Leftovers [View all]leveymg
(36,418 posts)40. I said that IAF F-4 fighter jets were downed by the SA-7 during the '73 War.
That was my original assertion (#14), and I believe that I have demonstrated that.
I provided documentary evidence to show the SA-7 MANPAD is capable of and did shoot down "fast movers" (fixed-wing military jets). You haven't established anything other than you put mustard on your pretzels.
You have insisted despite evidence that these weapons pose no serious threats to jet aircraft. You are simply wrong.
Bye, and have a safe flight home.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
76 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Israel Official Says Gaza Militants Getting Anti-Aircraft Missiles From Libyan War Leftovers [View all]
Purveyor
Oct 2012
OP
Good question. What is the difference with arming Syrian insurgents and not the Palestinians?
SESKATOW
Oct 2012
#5
yeah - nothing to do with "freedom, liberty, justice, democracy" and all that other junk. Right?
SESKATOW
Oct 2012
#51
Not really, I see all sorts of opinions here, and many don't even make sense.
bemildred
Oct 2012
#53
OK, the difference is the Syrian insurgents will get weapons and the Palestinians won't.
bemildred
Oct 2012
#55
You don't seem to appreciate the dilemma that Libyan MANPADs present for Israel and the US
leveymg
Oct 2012
#13
My point is "those knowledgable in this matter" went ahead with regime change, regardless.
leveymg
Oct 2012
#17
All these consequences were foreseeable, if one wants to foresee results rather than advocate policy
leveymg
Oct 2012
#20
well the players should watch where they leave their toys laying around that's for sure
azurnoir
Oct 2012
#45
In the end analysis, this has everything to do with Libyan and Syrian regime change operations.
leveymg
Oct 2012
#14
Same wiki also details dozens of combat and passenger jets shot down by SA-7s over the years
leveymg
Oct 2012
#26
SA7 "ineffective against combat jets" Tell that to the pilot of this IAF Mirage (1973). Video:
leveymg
Oct 2012
#29
And, if you still don't think SAMs are dangerous to combat jets, here's a USAF F15 over Iraq
leveymg
Oct 2012
#30
Quit being deceptive. It's a MANPAD - look at the relative size of the missile vs the plane
leveymg
Oct 2012
#34
Nothing except that the number of MANPADs floating around on the world market has gone up 1000%
leveymg
Oct 2012
#48
I suggest you learn something about the technology and the history of its use
ProgressiveProfessor
Oct 2012
#16
Yeah, and I'm sure you personally inspect them whenever you have the chance
shaayecanaan
Oct 2012
#32
You might want to consider that some of us here are former US military and/or DoD.
ProgressiveProfessor
Oct 2012
#35