Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: Iran was the first country to bomb a nuclear reactor. [View all]OKIsItJustMe
(19,938 posts)15. We don’t need to sell Israel nuclear warheads
Theyve already got them.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/experts-irans-underground-nuclear-sites-not-immune-to-us-bunker-busters/2012/02/24/gIQAzWaghR_story.html
[font face=Times, Times New Roman, Serif][font size=5]Irans underground nuclear sites not immune to U.S. bunker-busters, experts say[/font]
By Joby Warrick, Published: February 29
[font size=3]
In arguing their case, U.S. officials acknowledged some uncertainty over whether even the Pentagons newest bunker-buster weapon called the Massive Ordnance Penetrator could pierce in a single blow the subterranean chambers where Iran is making enriched uranium. But they said a sustained U.S. attack over multiple days would probably render the plant unusable by collapsing tunnels and irreparably damaging both its highly sensitive centrifuge equipment and the miles of pipes, tubes and wires required to operate it.
Hardened facilities require multiple sorties, said a former senior intelligence official who has studied the formerly secret Fordow site and who agreed to discuss sensitive details of U.S. strike capabilities on the condition of anonymity. The question is, how many turns do you get at the apple?
U.S. confidence has been reinforced by training exercises in which bombers assaulted similar targets in deeply buried bunkers and mountain tunnels, the officials and experts said.
U.S. officials have raised the necessity of multiple strikes as they warn Israel against a unilateral attack on Irans nuclear installations, the officials said. While Israel is capable of launching its own bunker-buster bombs against Fordow, it lacks the United States more advanced munitions and the ability to wage a bombing campaign over days and weeks, American officials and analysts said.
[/font][/font]
By Joby Warrick, Published: February 29
[font size=3]
In arguing their case, U.S. officials acknowledged some uncertainty over whether even the Pentagons newest bunker-buster weapon called the Massive Ordnance Penetrator could pierce in a single blow the subterranean chambers where Iran is making enriched uranium. But they said a sustained U.S. attack over multiple days would probably render the plant unusable by collapsing tunnels and irreparably damaging both its highly sensitive centrifuge equipment and the miles of pipes, tubes and wires required to operate it.
Hardened facilities require multiple sorties, said a former senior intelligence official who has studied the formerly secret Fordow site and who agreed to discuss sensitive details of U.S. strike capabilities on the condition of anonymity. The question is, how many turns do you get at the apple?
U.S. confidence has been reinforced by training exercises in which bombers assaulted similar targets in deeply buried bunkers and mountain tunnels, the officials and experts said.
U.S. officials have raised the necessity of multiple strikes as they warn Israel against a unilateral attack on Irans nuclear installations, the officials said. While Israel is capable of launching its own bunker-buster bombs against Fordow, it lacks the United States more advanced munitions and the ability to wage a bombing campaign over days and weeks, American officials and analysts said.
[/font][/font]
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
26 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The difference is, Iran was already at war with Iraq - the US and Israel armed both sides.
leveymg
Mar 2012
#1
You can frame it however you like. But, draw your own conclusions, and we'll draw ours.
leveymg
Mar 2012
#6
You're right about some of that, but use has no correlation at all with proliferation. Thank g-d -
leveymg
Mar 2012
#14
Miniturizing a nuclear warhead is much more complicated than just having nukes.
FBaggins
Mar 2012
#17