Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
So they're taking "appropriate countermeasures" to keep the truth from coming out? Scuba Sep 2013 #1
Why? chervilant Sep 2013 #2
You'll get an answer anyway, for the benefit of anyone else who's reading. wtmusic Sep 2013 #4
well TEPCO says it's not so bad and you make fun of our skepticism CreekDog Sep 2013 #19
That's hilarious, wt. Posting Tepco press releases as if they're honest and trustworthy. . . Journeyman Sep 2013 #3
I told him the same thing before. darkangel218 Sep 2013 #5
What's hilarious is that your hysteria is based on Tepco press releases wtmusic Sep 2013 #6
Exactly what hysteria do you perceive I exhibit? I despise garbage burners, and their defenders. . . Journeyman Sep 2013 #7
A timeline: 1) The information about the high levels was provided by Tepco in press releases wtmusic Sep 2013 #9
And again, I ask, when have I engaged in this behavior you're convinced I'm a proponent of?. . . Journeyman Sep 2013 #11
Too easy wtmusic Sep 2013 #12
And what does this post have to do with your present commentary? . . . Journeyman Sep 2013 #13
And why are you refusing to answer my question using inane diversion tactics? wtmusic Sep 2013 #14
You're the one using them as an authority today. What have they done to garner your respect?. . . Journeyman Sep 2013 #15
How do you know Tepco didn't lie in their initial release? wtmusic Sep 2013 #16
And it was upgraded to a level 3 problem, so journeyman's scepticism was justified muriel_volestrangler Sep 2013 #20
Yes, and upgraded for no good reason, according to IAEA wtmusic Sep 2013 #22
'23 gallons'? Your own link says 300 tonnes muriel_volestrangler Sep 2013 #23
I have no idea what link you're referring to. wtmusic Sep 2013 #24
Your link in #22 to the South China Morning Post, since you're too lazy to check muriel_volestrangler Sep 2013 #25
"Lazy" is probably not accurate. wtmusic Sep 2013 #26
As you now know, tests on workers shows their exposure was higher in July muriel_volestrangler Sep 2013 #27
"previous similar events have not been rated" kristopher Sep 2013 #28
Tepco????? Really...Tepco???? dixiegrrrrl Sep 2013 #8
A big expensive mess... but not Bhopal. hunter Sep 2013 #10
Oh hush, you and your inconvenient facts ... Nihil Sep 2013 #17
Thank you for clearing that up. kristopher Sep 2013 #18
You're welcome. Thank you for providing such a splendid example of a non-sequitur. (n/t) Nihil Sep 2013 #21
No, no, I insist the honors are all to you and yours my dearest friend. kristopher Sep 2013 #29
Even at face value the TEPCO piece is a mess caraher Sep 2013 #30
And it sounds like you are the one reporting the bullshit madokie Sep 2013 #31
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2013 #32
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Bullshit reporting about ...»Reply #31