Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

joshcryer

(62,270 posts)
31. God, you didn't even read my original fucking post here.
Sun Dec 23, 2012, 07:43 PM
Dec 2012

I was saying not using the "starter" is the "round about way."

LFTR,read up on it and watch the videos. jonthebru Dec 2012 #1
Its biggest problem is the uranium mining industry wtmusic Dec 2012 #2
Me, too. And I am famously anti-nuke (the dangerous waste-generating kind). kestrel91316 Dec 2012 #3
Not me. I'm now anti-nuke all the way. GliderGuider Dec 2012 #4
That's where a carbon tax comes in wtmusic Dec 2012 #5
How do you make every country on the planet go along with it? GliderGuider Dec 2012 #6
Either you believe a solution is possible, or you don't. wtmusic Dec 2012 #7
Do you think a solution is possible? GliderGuider Dec 2012 #9
I don't understand the purpose of deeper thought if it's merely an expression of hopelessness. wtmusic Dec 2012 #12
There are seven billion different ways of finding value in existence. GliderGuider Dec 2012 #14
Oh, I'm all about LFTR, but we have to be honest about it. joshcryer Dec 2012 #8
But the top story is about a current project. Not some future pipe dream. jonthebru Dec 2012 #10
U233 not required. wtmusic Dec 2012 #13
Right, the "round about way." joshcryer Dec 2012 #15
No wtmusic Dec 2012 #17
Since it takes about a decade to build a reactor after permission is granted. joshcryer Dec 2012 #21
Your assumptions are based on no historical precedent wtmusic Dec 2012 #22
WEll, do you got a timeline when you think it will be built? joshcryer Dec 2012 #23
It could be built in 5 years. wtmusic Dec 2012 #25
Flibe Energy exists, though. joshcryer Dec 2012 #26
Again, you don't understand. PamW Dec 2012 #19
Then why does the thorium community want U233? joshcryer Dec 2012 #20
Having a hard time understanding? PamW Dec 2012 #27
God, you didn't even read my original fucking post here. joshcryer Dec 2012 #31
Evidently you don't understand how it works... PamW Dec 2012 #18
I was not aware that the thorium community wanted to start it with U235. joshcryer Dec 2012 #24
What U-233? PamW Dec 2012 #28
We have roughly 450 kg of U233 from the nuclear program. joshcryer Dec 2012 #32
Order of magnitude shy... PamW Dec 2012 #34
They want to start with a small reactor. joshcryer Dec 2012 #37
Where does it say that? PamW Dec 2012 #46
"So a LFTR, started on U-233..." Read the article? joshcryer Dec 2012 #47
Post removed Post removed Dec 2012 #52
Politics played the biggest role, I admit. joshcryer Dec 2012 #53
For a guy who doesn't approve of energy, you certainly spend a lot of time on the internet. NNadir Dec 2012 #29
Why not? Arguing on the internet is a great way to pass the time till dinner. GliderGuider Dec 2012 #30
I'm just noting that many of the advocates of killing off humanity in an orgy of primitivism... NNadir Dec 2012 #57
Fishing again? nt GliderGuider Dec 2012 #58
There's a difference between advocacy and observation. joshcryer Dec 2012 #59
It's passive poverty. wtmusic Dec 2012 #33
Your lame attempt at moral bullying is duly noted. GliderGuider Dec 2012 #35
That's very profound, but in truth wtmusic Dec 2012 #36
What aspects of my expressed positions do you feel are hypocritical? GliderGuider Dec 2012 #38
This is ground that we've already covered but it's best phrased as a question wtmusic Dec 2012 #39
I don't approve or recommend dieoff. GliderGuider Dec 2012 #40
Inaction is approving dieoff. wtmusic Dec 2012 #41
Die off certainly isn't recommended. joshcryer Dec 2012 #44
Why do you give geoengineering a 50/50 shot? NoOneMan Dec 2012 #49
Sulphate aerosols are known to work (volcanos prove it). joshcryer Dec 2012 #50
Of course they "work" NoOneMan Dec 2012 #51
The results would be devestating either way. joshcryer Dec 2012 #54
Time will tell NoOneMan Dec 2012 #55
Necessity mainly. joshcryer Dec 2012 #56
Only if one feels that action will prevent it. GliderGuider Dec 2012 #45
Bad action is hastening dieoff NoOneMan Dec 2012 #48
BALONEY!!!! PamW Dec 2012 #16
The name "Thor Energy" XemaSab Dec 2012 #11
I noticed that, too! Odin2005 Dec 2012 #42
Yay for my fellow Norskies! Odin2005 Dec 2012 #43
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Norway Begins Four Year T...»Reply #31