Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: Don't believe the extremists: No Big Changes In Leaked Draft AR5 Report [View all]Nederland
(9,976 posts)107. Proof?
Can you offer some links to back up these assertions? In particular, I'd like to see proof that the IPCC is "ignoring a lot of new research" on feedbacks.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
115 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Don't believe the extremists: No Big Changes In Leaked Draft AR5 Report [View all]
Nederland
Dec 2012
OP
And there's no sign that we are deviating from the highest-carbon scenarios.
GliderGuider
Dec 2012
#11
They don't even assess drought. Hopefully that's changed before AR5 is finished.
joshcryer
Dec 2012
#15
Which is how I'm beginning to think the IPCC should conduct it's business as well.
AverageJoe90
Dec 2012
#63
Nope, sorry - and the Chicken Little cartoon was the last straw - hot-button for me
hatrack
Dec 2012
#90
Isn't it perhaps possible that methane may not have as much of a impact.....
AverageJoe90
Dec 2012
#61
You aren't allowed to allude to that "possibility" without a leaked IPCC AR5 snippet to back you up
NoOneMan
Dec 2012
#64
He is not qualified according to the criteria Rajendra Pachauri claimed was used
Nederland
Dec 2012
#84