Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: "How did we get a host?" a locked thread asks? Here is the answer. [View all]kristopher
(29,798 posts)113. Advocate for nuclear power.
TopBack to the top of the page
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
ShareGet links to this post
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
164 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"How did we get a host?" a locked thread asks? Here is the answer. [View all]
kristopher
Dec 2011
OP
Please clarify a couple of your views; when asked earlier you sidstepped the questions.
kristopher
Dec 2011
#28
So she didn't tell Skinner there was an ongoing discussion because I too volunteered to be host?
kristopher
Dec 2011
#8
Do you understand that this thread has nothing to do with the scientific value of Jacobson's paper?
GliderGuider
Dec 2011
#32
I was about ready to swallow that emotional maturity argument and then I saw JPak as a host.
Massacure
Dec 2011
#19
In my defense - I usually respond to vicious over-the-top personal attacks with real laughter
jpak
Dec 2011
#30
He's trying hard to get the thread locked and (he hopes) himself blocked as disruptive.
FBaggins
Dec 2011
#153
I knew from the beginning E/E would face the most contentious discussion re hosts ...
eppur_se_muova
Dec 2011
#37
This "host selection" has been exactly contrary to the stated process in the DU3-Announcements-forum
Kolesar
Dec 2011
#61
"The pronuclear temporary hosts that are on the list don't have my approval" makes that pretty clear
FBaggins
Dec 2011
#66
"This one has been cleared by Skinner as a re-visit of "Do we need hosts?" = BS
kristopher
Dec 2011
#85
I think it is blatantly obvious to every reader of this thread exactly who is being "self serving".
Nihil
Dec 2011
#101
In other words you do not have a reason to oppose splitting EE into two groups.
kristopher
Dec 2011
#127
And you insist that your interpretation of what "the science" says is the correct one.
FBaggins
Dec 2011
#136
You said "the guy has a right to exist." Who is denying him that even with his disruptive behavior?
joshcryer
Dec 2011
#98
What you thought has absolutely nothing to do with the question asked of Xemasab.
kristopher
Dec 2011
#86
You obviously think that a discussion is "ongoing" until you get what you want.
FBaggins
Dec 2011
#99
And you obviously think that stealing the postion of host is a legitimate act.
kristopher
Dec 2011
#103
Groups can have from 0 to 20 hosts. I have a simple solution to resolve this thread.
freshwest
Dec 2011
#130