Reply #11

In the discussion thread: 'Faster Than We Thought': An Epitaph for Planet Earth [View all]

Wed May 23, 2012, 10:17 PM

11. And as always it ignores the transportation issue...

Last edited Wed May 23, 2012, 10:28 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

As well as the hundreds of non-energy-related environmental and ecological issues that are destroying the planet, that are completely independent of where we get our electricity from.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

36 replies	Author	Time	Post
'Faster Than We Thought': An Epitaph for Planet Earth [View all]	GliderGuider	May 2012	OP
I wish the Earth well, she'll do better without us.	Lionessa	May 2012	#1
I've said it many times on DU, the human race is too dumb to survive. nt	ladjf	May 2012	#4
.	XemaSab	May 2012	#2
"Look your children in the eye, while you still can" --NNadir	phantom power	May 2012	#3
For all the crazy stuff that guy wrote, that one line rings true. NT	NickB79	May 2012	#8
XXX is happening faster than expected.	kristopher	May 2012	#5
Table 6.1 really hammers home what a lot of us have felt for a long time here on E/E	NickB79	May 2012	#9
And as always it ignores the transportation issue...	GliderGuider	May 2012	#11
More sour grapes GG?	kristopher	May 2012	#14
No, just pointing out that as usual	GliderGuider	May 2012	#16
No one has overlooked anything	kristopher	May 2012	#17
Look again NickyB, and tell us truly what you see.	kristopher	May 2012	#13
Funny that you choose to use GW values instead of TWH values in your reply to my point about TWH's	NickB79	May 2012	#35
Thank you. That seems a good source.	kristopher	May 2012	#36
Let's look at the electrical generation from Table 6.1	GliderGuider	May 2012	#12
Here's another version using the actual 2009 data instead of their projection	GliderGuider	May 2012	#15
You're just tossing out nonsense and wrapping it in a graph...	kristopher	May 2012	#19
Amusing that you were fine with the graph that was based on 1998 WEO.	joshcryer	May 2012	#20
Are you all right? There is no graph for the 1998 WEO forecast.	kristopher	May 2012	#23
Are you all right? GG posted the graph he made in #12.	joshcryer	May 2012	#24
Given that you seem awfully concerned about what sources other people are using...	XemaSab	May 2012	#25
???	GliderGuider	May 2012	#27
I was waiting for your unruly 'children' to go to bed	kristopher	May 2012	#29
TL; DNR	GliderGuider	May 2012	#30
Did you flatten the curve deliberately or is it too complicated for you.	kristopher	May 2012	#31
The renewables curve was an exponential trend line.	GliderGuider	May 2012	#32
You understated a key data point by 600% to grossly understate the renewable trendline	kristopher	May 2012	#33
Please try to understand	GliderGuider	May 2012	#34
Thank you for charting the data, GG. It shows quite nicely that while...	joshcryer	May 2012	#22
All you've done is illustrate my point	kristopher	May 2012	#18
Wait, I thought that was nonsense wrapped up into a graph?	joshcryer	May 2012	#21
At least somebody gets the point...	GliderGuider	May 2012	#28
These graphs from New Scientist always drove the point home for me.	GliderGuider	May 2012	#6
Nah ...	Nihil	May 2012	#26
This time, no lifeboats... even for the RICH.	bvar22	May 2012	#7
I'm not that pessimistic, but the old Chinese curse still applies.	Odin2005	May 2012	#10

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.