Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Dead_Parrot

(14,478 posts)
94. The option for user-created groups should be along shortly, if that helps.
Tue Dec 20, 2011, 12:04 AM
Dec 2011

It's on the Admins "to do" list.

Here's the deal: XemaSab Dec 2011 #1
Please clarify a couple of your views; when asked earlier you sidstepped the questions. kristopher Dec 2011 #28
One clarification and one additional question kristopher Dec 2011 #36
. XemaSab Dec 2011 #39
Why wont you answer the question posed? kristopher Dec 2011 #45
Err, Because it was the most popular option? Dead_Parrot Dec 2011 #46
That has nothing to do with the questions posed to xema. kristopher Dec 2011 #47
You misunderstand, Kris. Dead_Parrot Dec 2011 #48
Why are you acting as xema's proxy? kristopher Dec 2011 #49
If you want to start a thread to form a new SOP, go ahead. Dead_Parrot Dec 2011 #50
He says after 4 posts diverting from the topic - Questions for Xema - kristopher Dec 2011 #51
You're still not getting it, Kris Dead_Parrot Dec 2011 #52
You too are a very strong advocate for nuclear power, right? kristopher Dec 2011 #107
I prefer hydro offset by wind. Dead_Parrot Dec 2011 #155
Only 25% of the Democratic party supports your position on nuclear. kristopher Dec 2011 #104
Why not wait for evidence of malfeasance? GliderGuider Dec 2011 #2
The deceptive method of becoming host was malfeasance. kristopher Dec 2011 #3
Sorry. Nope. FBaggins Dec 2011 #5
Why was an end run around the process attempted? kristopher Dec 2011 #6
Because you desperately wanted to be the host of course. FBaggins Dec 2011 #7
So she didn't tell Skinner there was an ongoing discussion because I too volunteered to be host? kristopher Dec 2011 #8
As I said... disingenuous at best. FBaggins Dec 2011 #11
I actually have no problem with two groups Nederland Dec 2011 #24
The invitation is still standing. kristopher Dec 2011 #25
I completely agree Nederland Dec 2011 #29
And the invitation still stands... kristopher Dec 2011 #31
Do you understand that this thread has nothing to do with the scientific value of Jacobson's paper? GliderGuider Dec 2011 #32
That post explains my behavior - and questions your own. kristopher Dec 2011 #33
You're really going to take that route? GliderGuider Dec 2011 #34
I shared what I had already written. kristopher Dec 2011 #35
I will decline the invitation Nederland Dec 2011 #40
Of course you will kristopher Dec 2011 #41
Do you have absolutely no sense of humor at all? (nt) Nederland Dec 2011 #43
medical experts say that not understanding sarcasm Confusious Dec 2011 #44
Advocate for nuclear power. kristopher Dec 2011 #114
Is that suppose to be a degrogatory comment? Confusious Dec 2011 #145
A climate "skeptic" and a proponent of nuclear power. kristopher Dec 2011 #108
Even worse, I'm a Unitarian too... (nt) Nederland Dec 2011 #157
Heathen! Dead_Parrot Dec 2011 #158
The personal insults continue Nederland Dec 2011 #162
NOBODY expects the Spanish Inquisition! Dead_Parrot Dec 2011 #163
Unitarian, eh? Same background for me. GliderGuider Dec 2011 #161
You are a nuclear supporter, correct? kristopher Dec 2011 #105
Are you serious? FBaggins Dec 2011 #120
Damned right it's relevant. kristopher Dec 2011 #123
Nope. And I note that you're dodging the actual relevant question. FBaggins Dec 2011 #124
This message was self-deleted by its author Nederland Dec 2011 #156
I have to agree with your assessement... SpoonFed Dec 2011 #53
"Emotional maturity" FBaggins Dec 2011 #4
I was about ready to swallow that emotional maturity argument and then I saw JPak as a host. Massacure Dec 2011 #19
There's a difference. FBaggins Dec 2011 #20
Seconded. AtheistCrusader Dec 2011 #26
"Reformed" advocate for nuclear power kristopher Dec 2011 #112
In my defense - I usually respond to vicious over-the-top personal attacks with real laughter jpak Dec 2011 #30
Advocate for nuclear power. kristopher Dec 2011 #115
Someone who imagines that that's relevant. FBaggins Dec 2011 #121
Good point Yo_Mama Dec 2011 #9
Advocate for nuclear power. kristopher Dec 2011 #113
There's already been several examples of malfeasance and abuse. bananas Dec 2011 #16
"We were reaching a consensus of no host" joshcryer Dec 2011 #17
Your bar for "malfeasance and abuse" appears incredibly low FBaggins Dec 2011 #18
Well, this is why I was a "no host" person all along caraher Dec 2011 #22
Post removed Post removed Dec 2011 #116
Yep. SpoonFed Dec 2011 #54
Two? Out of six. Confusious Dec 2011 #58
Where? Nihil Dec 2011 #60
Post removed Post removed Dec 2011 #110
That is a lie. Nihil Dec 2011 #125
Post removed Post removed Dec 2011 #109
kristopher, your behaviour in this thread is outrageous and disruptive. GliderGuider Dec 2011 #148
He's trying hard to get the thread locked and (he hopes) himself blocked as disruptive. FBaggins Dec 2011 #153
I admit, I was surprised at first to find we had a host OKIsItJustMe Dec 2011 #10
I figured that you would feel that way. FBaggins Dec 2011 #12
I’ll take it as a compliment (thanks) OKIsItJustMe Dec 2011 #13
I'm pleased with our Hosts. joshcryer Dec 2011 #14
So long as we burn fossil fuels E&E will be inseparable... hunter Dec 2011 #23
Yet another nuclear power advocate. kristopher Dec 2011 #111
My input as a member host on my assignment - pinto Dec 2011 #15
Some reading for those interested kristopher Dec 2011 #21
The hypocrisy is rancid Confusious Dec 2011 #27
I think it's clear that your ongoing vitriolic attacts against kristopher... SpoonFed Dec 2011 #55
Really, which would those be? Confusious Dec 2011 #57
I knew from the beginning E/E would face the most contentious discussion re hosts ... eppur_se_muova Dec 2011 #37
The chances of reaching absolute consensus across E/E... Dead_Parrot Dec 2011 #38
Advocate for nuclear power. kristopher Dec 2011 #117
A noun phrase, not a statement about anything. eppur_se_muova Dec 2011 #143
Hosts and 2 groups bloom Dec 2011 #42
Thanks for your post... SpoonFed Dec 2011 #56
A nod to you and Bloom upthread Kolesar Dec 2011 #62
Alerted for continuation personal attacks from other threads as well as ... Nihil Dec 2011 #59
This "host selection" has been exactly contrary to the stated process in the DU3-Announcements-forum Kolesar Dec 2011 #61
Protip: don't believe everything you read on the internet XemaSab Dec 2011 #63
Post removed Post removed Dec 2011 #65
"The pronuclear temporary hosts that are on the list don't have my approval" makes that pretty clear FBaggins Dec 2011 #66
Sorry if my response to you came off as rude, that wasn't my intent XemaSab Dec 2011 #68
Welcome to DU3. There are still some things to catch up on. FBaggins Dec 2011 #64
I didn't know there are no moderators Kolesar Dec 2011 #67
Lack of "taste" can be dealt with through the jury system. FBaggins Dec 2011 #69
Tastefull and fair are not interlinked Confusious Dec 2011 #70
The OP is an accurate summary of what led to this. kristopher Dec 2011 #71
You need to go find yourself a hobby or something. Systematic Chaos Dec 2011 #72
I cannot express properly in words how disappointed I am... SpoonFed Dec 2011 #73
Lol! You must live in some sort of bizarro world. FBaggins Dec 2011 #74
Thanks for posting a good example of... SpoonFed Dec 2011 #76
You are entitled to an opinion. FBaggins Dec 2011 #78
Your entire premise is false, no one is suppressing anyone. joshcryer Dec 2011 #75
Straw man arguments in the past couple of replies... SpoonFed Dec 2011 #77
You seem to be confused about how DU3 works Dead_Parrot Dec 2011 #82
"This one has been cleared by Skinner as a re-visit of "Do we need hosts?" = BS kristopher Dec 2011 #85
That was my reading of it Dead_Parrot Dec 2011 #89
A self serving reading that is obviously not supported by the OP kristopher Dec 2011 #91
The option for user-created groups should be along shortly, if that helps. Dead_Parrot Dec 2011 #94
Sorry... no. It has been your reading that has been self-serving. FBaggins Dec 2011 #100
I think it is blatantly obvious to every reader of this thread exactly who is being "self serving". Nihil Dec 2011 #101
Yes it is "blindingly obvious". kristopher Dec 2011 #102
If you are going to use quotes, at least get the words right ... Nihil Dec 2011 #119
In other words you do not have a reason to oppose splitting EE into two groups. kristopher Dec 2011 #127
Nope. FBaggins Dec 2011 #128
Not at all. I want the science to lead the discussion kristopher Dec 2011 #133
And you insist that your interpretation of what "the science" says is the correct one. FBaggins Dec 2011 #136
Most of it isn't subject to "interpretation". kristopher Dec 2011 #138
Sorry. You're dead wrong. FBaggins Dec 2011 #139
You mean the IPCC, the IEEE journal, DOE etc. kristopher Dec 2011 #142
Nope... and it isn't a red herring. FBaggins Dec 2011 #151
Much as you might want it to be otherwise, you are still wrong. Nihil Dec 2011 #131
. kristopher Dec 2011 #135
Ah ... Nihil Dec 2011 #140
You said "the guy has a right to exist." Who is denying him that even with his disruptive behavior? joshcryer Dec 2011 #98
Advocate for nuclear power. kristopher Dec 2011 #118
Yes, well put. SpoonFed Dec 2011 #79
Please XemaSab Dec 2011 #80
Why didn't you tell skinner the discussion was ongoing? kristopher Dec 2011 #81
Personally, I thought it was wrapped up Dead_Parrot Dec 2011 #83
What you thought has absolutely nothing to do with the question asked of Xemasab. kristopher Dec 2011 #86
I'm speaking for *my*self, kris Dead_Parrot Dec 2011 #87
But I wasn't speaking TO you was I. I asked HER to explain HER act. kristopher Dec 2011 #88
Oh, I'm sorry. Dead_Parrot Dec 2011 #90
It wasn't a private message, it was a question specifically to Xemasab. kristopher Dec 2011 #92
If it wasn't private then anyone that wishes may reply to it. n/t GliderGuider Dec 2011 #95
What do you think this is, some sort of internet forum? Dead_Parrot Dec 2011 #97
Once more: Why didn't you tell skinner the discussion was ongoing? kristopher Dec 2011 #93
OK Xema. kristopher Dec 2011 #96
You obviously think that a discussion is "ongoing" until you get what you want. FBaggins Dec 2011 #99
And you obviously think that stealing the postion of host is a legitimate act. kristopher Dec 2011 #103
Lol that you continue to claim that anything was "stolen" FBaggins Dec 2011 #106
Then why didn't she accurately relate the state of the discussion here? kristopher Dec 2011 #122
She did. FBaggins Dec 2011 #126
You have to be kidding. kristopher Dec 2011 #129
Nope. You've again confused "consensus" with "unanimity". FBaggins Dec 2011 #132
Really, OUR behavior Confusious Dec 2011 #147
You got that there are no moderators now, yes? Dead_Parrot Dec 2011 #84
Groups can have from 0 to 20 hosts. I have a simple solution to resolve this thread. freshwest Dec 2011 #130
We already have anti-nuke hosts. Good ones. FBaggins Dec 2011 #134
Please link that statement, I've never seen it. freshwest Dec 2011 #144
Sure. FBaggins Dec 2011 #149
You're reading way too much into that. He's a nerd, thinks, talks like one. freshwest Dec 2011 #154
Please take a moment to read these two posts kristopher Dec 2011 #137
Reasonable suggestion. Nihil Dec 2011 #141
So if someone complains enough, we should give in Confusious Dec 2011 #146
OK, are we done with this puerile foolishness now? n/t GliderGuider Dec 2011 #150
Did kris get exactly what he wanted? FBaggins Dec 2011 #152
Maybe he can captain the pseudoscience forum. miyazaki Dec 2011 #159
Well, I'm going to alert on this thread. It's not about E & E, really. freshwest Dec 2011 #160
I'm locking this for now. pinto Dec 2011 #164
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»"How did we get a ho...»Reply #94