Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
17. That's why I bracket the dates 1900 and 1925.
Sun May 13, 2012, 04:58 AM
May 2012

I think we were already heading into overshoot by 1900 - if we weren't quite in overshoot yet, it was just ahead. I used 1925 to pin my population numbers to the planet's carrying capacity. I think the earth could have supported indefinitely the two billion population we reached in 1925 - with the proviso that we didn't use any more fossil fuel than we were using then. Our our subsequent expansion of fossil fuel is what has driven us ever deeper into overshoot and simultaneously degraded CCo . I think CCo is around 1.8 billion now, and declining toward my ultimate estimate of 1.25 billion.

My date for entering overshoot is quite a bit earlier than the one proposed by Wackernagel and Rees, because the "ecological footprint" concept is a bottom-up approach that IMO doesn't give enough weight to the survival of other species or the accumulation of GHG since 1900.

Yeah. So? RobertEarl May 2012 #1
Probably more than a "Yeah? So?" question for those of us who have children. villager May 2012 #2
You have children? RobertEarl May 2012 #3
Hell yes, I'm worried about what we're leaving to our kids. Jackpine Radical May 2012 #5
What will you do? RobertEarl May 2012 #6
"Yes" villager May 2012 #7
"So??" That's the response of a sociopath, of someone with kestrel91316 May 2012 #8
Did you read the whole post? RobertEarl May 2012 #10
Some questions kristopher May 2012 #4
A few further comments, for those who want to save civilization. GliderGuider May 2012 #9
How does accepting your thesis help save civilization? kristopher May 2012 #11
Seriously? RobertEarl May 2012 #12
"But what do I know?" kristopher May 2012 #13
Nows your big chance RobertEarl May 2012 #15
That depends on what you do with it. GliderGuider May 2012 #14
If the British Empire used coal as a work multiplier, FogerRox May 2012 #16
That's why I bracket the dates 1900 and 1925. GliderGuider May 2012 #17
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Overshoot - the road we c...»Reply #17