Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
7. Let me warn you off the top that my position on this issue is controversial.
Mon Apr 30, 2012, 02:18 PM
Apr 2012

The crisis that humanity finds itself in right now has many, many components. Climate change, peak oil, pervasive chemical pollution, the depletion of ground water and soil fertility, shifting rainfall patterns, species extinctions due to human activity (overhunting, overfishing and habitat destruction), economic and financial instability, etc.

Only two of these issues would be directly addressed by fusion power: CO2 production and oil depletion. The rest of the problems we face exist irrespective of the source or nature of the energy we use. That's because those problems are caused by human activity, which is driven by exosomatic energy. The production of huge amounts of energy, even if it is CO2-free, enables commensurately huge levels of human activity. This activity is a direct threat to non-human life that is already being pressured severely by our existing activity levels. As more and more species are driven into extinction as a result of our actions, it's only a matter of tiume until we eliminate a keystone species - one that is fundamentally important to either us or the biosphere in general. At that point it's game over.

As a result I'm in favour of dealing with our problems by cutting back human activity levels while moving towards less impactful forms of energy like wind power. The concern I have is that fusion power like this will produce too much energy too cheaply, and in using it we may drive the planet past the point where it can sustain some or all life.

The quantum fusion hypothesis [View all] GliderGuider Apr 2012 OP
I'm not sure what's more absurd. TheWraith Apr 2012 #1
From Brillouin's web site GliderGuider Apr 2012 #2
The article just dismisses conservation of mass? n/t Henryman Apr 2012 #3
Why do you ask that? GliderGuider Apr 2012 #4
Very interesting... immoderate Apr 2012 #5
Not being a scientist ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2012 #6
Let me warn you off the top that my position on this issue is controversial. GliderGuider Apr 2012 #7
This: 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2012 #9
Yes, I think the human population will drop. GliderGuider Apr 2012 #10
Thick and thin RobertEarl Apr 2012 #11
How is a die-off mass murder? GliderGuider Apr 2012 #14
Well RobertEarl Apr 2012 #15
OK, with that I agree completely. GliderGuider Apr 2012 #18
Sounds like your argument is with the Pope pscot May 2012 #23
That is one obstacle, indeed RobertEarl May 2012 #25
I've been around E/E too long XemaSab Apr 2012 #22
Whenever I read something like this I think of pscot May 2012 #24
Well, let's see how this pans out longship Apr 2012 #8
LOL! Usually bogus science is just grim, but this one is just comic. eppur_se_muova Apr 2012 #12
A hypothesis has been floated, but no testable theory yet. GliderGuider Apr 2012 #13
His hypotheses are directly contrary to known experimental results. eppur_se_muova Apr 2012 #16
Hey, I'd be overjoyed if this was just more marketing BS! nt GliderGuider Apr 2012 #17
In that case, let the celebration begin ! nt eppur_se_muova Apr 2012 #19
Yay! We're not saved!!! GliderGuider Apr 2012 #20
Yay! RobertEarl Apr 2012 #21
Sounds similar to the E-cat FogerRox May 2012 #28
Funny how Mr. Godes doesn't seem to feel the need to submit his work for peer review NickB79 May 2012 #26
Well, I'm convinced. Dead_Parrot May 2012 #27
Just silly FogerRox May 2012 #29
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»The quantum fusion hypoth...»Reply #7