HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Environment & Energy » Environment & Energy (Group) » Spent Fuel Pools » Reply #21
In the discussion thread: Spent Fuel Pools [View all]

Response to FBaggins (Reply #20)

Thu Apr 19, 2012, 10:06 PM

21. Read>> spent fuel

The activity ratio of 238Pu/239,240Pu in the aerosol
sample was 1.2, indicating a presence of the spent fuel of different origin than that of the Chernobyl
accident.


Lets see. Whom am I to believe.... a group of scientists who live near Chernonbyl and have built sophisticated sampling devices to ascertain nuke waste presence, or FBaggins?

And, golly, gosh, they sample near Chernobyl which is halfway around the world from Japan. Of course the presence of Chernobyl waste is gonna be greater than that from Japan.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 23 replies Author Time Post
RobertEarl Apr 2012 OP
madokie Apr 2012 #1
RobertEarl Apr 2012 #2
FBaggins Apr 2012 #3
RobertEarl Apr 2012 #4
FBaggins Apr 2012 #5
RobertEarl Apr 2012 #6
FBaggins Apr 2012 #7
RobertEarl Apr 2012 #8
FBaggins Apr 2012 #9
RobertEarl Apr 2012 #10
FBaggins Apr 2012 #11
RobertEarl Apr 2012 #12
PamW Apr 2012 #13
RobertEarl Apr 2012 #14
FBaggins Apr 2012 #16
FBaggins Apr 2012 #15
RobertEarl Apr 2012 #17
FBaggins Apr 2012 #18
RobertEarl Apr 2012 #19
FBaggins Apr 2012 #20
LineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineNew Reply Read>> spent fuel
RobertEarl Apr 2012 #21
RobertEarl Apr 2012 #22
RobertEarl Feb 2013 #23
Please login to view edit histories.