Reply #4

In the discussion thread: A second nuclear reactor ahead for Missouri? [View all]

Thu Apr 19, 2012, 10:36 AM

FBaggins (11,619 posts)

4. It would probably go on the existing nuke site.

That's just a guess, but it's usually the easiest way to get them approved... and I think one was looked at a couple years ago.

So you either already have one upwind, or still wouldn't.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

7 replies	Author	Time	Post
A second nuclear reactor ahead for Missouri? [View all]	FBaggins	Apr 2012	OP
And the wind swept plains would make a great wind farm area;	BlueToTheBone	Apr 2012	#1
It may involve wind power as well.	FBaggins	Apr 2012	#2
Thanks for the clarification.	BlueToTheBone	Apr 2012	#3
It would probably go on the existing nuke site.	FBaggins	Apr 2012	#4
Inaccurate Press Report Speculates on Ameren Missouri and Westinghouse Electric Announcement	kristopher	Apr 2012	#5
Did you notice the question marks in the OP?	FBaggins	Apr 2012	#6
Looks like I guessed right.	FBaggins	Apr 2012	#7

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.