HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Economy & Education » Economy (Group) » STOCK MARKET WATCH - Tues... » Reply #41

Response to Tansy_Gold (Original post)

Tue Jan 17, 2012, 08:17 AM

41. Economists’ ‘Inside Job’ Problem Begs More Than Disclosure: View

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-17/economists-inside-job-conflicts-beg-for-more-than-pay-disclosure-view.html



Economics, at its best, has a noble goal: Figure out what makes people better off and how we can have more of it. Its practitioners in academia need to do a more effective job of defending that ideal against private interests.

Academic economists have recently become the unaccustomed subjects of intense scrutiny. The 2010 documentary “Inside Job” drew public attention to the board seats, consulting gigs and sponsored research that tie many of them to Wall Street. They often failed to disclose such conflicts of interest in their research papers and public comments on topics such as financial reform -- omissions that could influence decisions affecting the lives and livelihoods of millions of people.

At its annual meeting earlier this month, the American Economic Association took a step toward solving the disclosure problem. It adopted guidelines requiring economists, when making public comments or publishing papers in AEA journals, such as the American Economic Review, to detail any funding they have received from interested parties.

Universities and other research institutions should follow suit, and some already are. As employers, they have more power to turn guidelines into rules. And by adopting common standards, they can help academics avoid confusion over what needs to be reported.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 78 replies Author Time Post
Tansy_Gold Jan 2012 OP
Demeter Jan 2012 #1
Roland99 Jan 2012 #47
Roland99 Jan 2012 #64
Demeter Jan 2012 #2
Demeter Jan 2012 #3
dixiegrrrrl Jan 2012 #57
Demeter Jan 2012 #4
jtuck004 Jan 2012 #11
newfie11 Jan 2012 #17
Demeter Jan 2012 #18
jtuck004 Jan 2012 #68
Tansy_Gold Jan 2012 #75
Po_d Mainiac Jan 2012 #46
Demeter Jan 2012 #5
Demeter Jan 2012 #6
Demeter Jan 2012 #7
Demeter Jan 2012 #8
Tansy_Gold Jan 2012 #9
dixiegrrrrl Jan 2012 #58
xchrom Jan 2012 #13
westerebus Jan 2012 #10
xchrom Jan 2012 #12
xchrom Jan 2012 #14
xchrom Jan 2012 #15
Ghost Dog Jan 2012 #16
Demeter Jan 2012 #19
DemReadingDU Jan 2012 #30
xchrom Jan 2012 #20
Demeter Jan 2012 #21
Demeter Jan 2012 #22
Demeter Jan 2012 #23
dixiegrrrrl Jan 2012 #59
Demeter Jan 2012 #72
Demeter Jan 2012 #24
Demeter Jan 2012 #25
Demeter Jan 2012 #26
Tansy_Gold Jan 2012 #40
dixiegrrrrl Jan 2012 #61
Demeter Jan 2012 #27
Demeter Jan 2012 #28
Demeter Jan 2012 #34
Demeter Jan 2012 #35
Demeter Jan 2012 #37
Demeter Jan 2012 #52
Demeter Jan 2012 #38
Demeter Jan 2012 #39
Demeter Jan 2012 #29
Demeter Jan 2012 #31
Demeter Jan 2012 #32
Demeter Jan 2012 #33
Loge23 Jan 2012 #55
Fuddnik Jan 2012 #71
Demeter Jan 2012 #73
Demeter Jan 2012 #36
LineReply Economists’ ‘Inside Job’ Problem Begs More Than Disclosure: View
xchrom Jan 2012 #41
xchrom Jan 2012 #42
xchrom Jan 2012 #43
xchrom Jan 2012 #44
xchrom Jan 2012 #45
Roland99 Jan 2012 #48
xchrom Jan 2012 #49
DemReadingDU Jan 2012 #50
dixiegrrrrl Jan 2012 #62
Tansy_Gold Jan 2012 #78
Demeter Jan 2012 #51
dixiegrrrrl Jan 2012 #63
Ghost Dog Jan 2012 #66
Demeter Jan 2012 #74
dixiegrrrrl Jan 2012 #76
Demeter Jan 2012 #53
Demeter Jan 2012 #54
Ghost Dog Jan 2012 #56
AnneD Jan 2012 #60
Ghost Dog Jan 2012 #67
AnneD Jan 2012 #69
xchrom Jan 2012 #65
Demeter Jan 2012 #70
Tansy_Gold Jan 2012 #77
Please login to view edit histories.