Economy
In reply to the discussion: guns and the social economics of mandatory liability insurance and taxation [View all]Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)To the extent that gun ownership is a constitutionally protected right (it varies, but after Heller it's hard to argue that it isn't), your proposal is unconstitutional, because it changes a citizen's right to an economic right.
For example, you cannot charge people a fee to attend a public meeting where public business is being discussed, you cannot charge a poll tax, you cannot institute a licensing scheme the effect of which is to block poorer people from access to publishing or open forums, etc.
Heller and McDonald do confer certain rights to gun owners which are real. You don't have to agree with the decisions in these cases, but you do have to deal with legal ramifications of the decisions:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_v._Heller
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonald_v._Chicago