Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: Weekend Economists Plead the Fifth; December 14-16, 2012 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)13. The Lansing-Beijing connection Harold Meyerson
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/harold-meyerson-unions-still-matter-in-michigan-just-as-in-china/2012/12/11/d77d9948-43c9-11e2-8061-253bccfc7532_story.html?hpid=z2&wpisrc=nl_wonk
China has a problem: rising inequality. The gap between profits and wages is soaring. Although elements of the government have sought to boost workers incomes, they have been thwarted by major companies and banks that dont want to give more profit to the country and let the government distribute it, Qi Jingmei, a research fellow for a government think tank, told the Wall Street Journal. Of course, if China permitted the establishment of unions, wages would rise. But for fundamentally political reasons independent unions would undermine the Communist Partys authority unions are out of the question.
Meanwhile, the United States also has a problem of a rising gap between profits and wages. The stagnation of wages has become an accepted fact across the political spectrum; conservative columnists such as Michael Gerson and David Brooks have acknowledged that workers incomes seem to be stuck. What conservatives havent acknowledged, and what even most liberal commentators fail to appreciate, is how central the collapse of collective bargaining is to American workers inability to win themselves a raise. Yes, globalizing and mechanizing jobs has cut into the livelihoods of millions of U.S. workers, but that is far from the whole story. Roughly 100?million of the nations 143?million employed workers have jobs that cant be shipped abroad, that arent in competition with steel workers in Sao Paulo or iPod assemblers in Shenzhen. Sales clerks, waiters, librarians and carpenters all utilize technology in their jobs, but not to the point that theyve become dispensable.
Yet while they cant be dispensed with, neither can they bargain for a raise. Today fewer than 7?percent of private-sector workers are union members. That figure may shrink a little more with new right to work laws in Michigan the propagandistic term for statutes that allow workers to benefit from union contracts without having to pay union dues.
Defenders of right-to-work laws argue that they improve a states economy by creating more jobs. But an exhaustive study by economist Lonnie K. Stevans of Hofstra University found that states that have enacted such laws reported no increase in business start-ups or rates of employment. Wages and personal income are lower in those states than in those without such laws, Stevans concluded, though proprietors incomes are higher. In short, right-to-work laws simply redistribute income from workers to owners...Those who doubt that the intent of Michigans laws is more political than economic should consider the two kinds of unions exempted from its reach: police and firefighter unions. Their contracts are among the costliest that local governments confront: Police and firefighters generally (and rightly) retire earlier than do other public employees, with relatively generous pension benefits. But in Michigan, police and firefighter unions often endorse Republicans. Shrinking their treasuries and political power by subjecting them to right-to-work strictures would only damage Republicans electoral prospects (and may well play poorly to voters).
China has a problem: rising inequality. The gap between profits and wages is soaring. Although elements of the government have sought to boost workers incomes, they have been thwarted by major companies and banks that dont want to give more profit to the country and let the government distribute it, Qi Jingmei, a research fellow for a government think tank, told the Wall Street Journal. Of course, if China permitted the establishment of unions, wages would rise. But for fundamentally political reasons independent unions would undermine the Communist Partys authority unions are out of the question.
Meanwhile, the United States also has a problem of a rising gap between profits and wages. The stagnation of wages has become an accepted fact across the political spectrum; conservative columnists such as Michael Gerson and David Brooks have acknowledged that workers incomes seem to be stuck. What conservatives havent acknowledged, and what even most liberal commentators fail to appreciate, is how central the collapse of collective bargaining is to American workers inability to win themselves a raise. Yes, globalizing and mechanizing jobs has cut into the livelihoods of millions of U.S. workers, but that is far from the whole story. Roughly 100?million of the nations 143?million employed workers have jobs that cant be shipped abroad, that arent in competition with steel workers in Sao Paulo or iPod assemblers in Shenzhen. Sales clerks, waiters, librarians and carpenters all utilize technology in their jobs, but not to the point that theyve become dispensable.
Yet while they cant be dispensed with, neither can they bargain for a raise. Today fewer than 7?percent of private-sector workers are union members. That figure may shrink a little more with new right to work laws in Michigan the propagandistic term for statutes that allow workers to benefit from union contracts without having to pay union dues.
Defenders of right-to-work laws argue that they improve a states economy by creating more jobs. But an exhaustive study by economist Lonnie K. Stevans of Hofstra University found that states that have enacted such laws reported no increase in business start-ups or rates of employment. Wages and personal income are lower in those states than in those without such laws, Stevans concluded, though proprietors incomes are higher. In short, right-to-work laws simply redistribute income from workers to owners...Those who doubt that the intent of Michigans laws is more political than economic should consider the two kinds of unions exempted from its reach: police and firefighter unions. Their contracts are among the costliest that local governments confront: Police and firefighters generally (and rightly) retire earlier than do other public employees, with relatively generous pension benefits. But in Michigan, police and firefighter unions often endorse Republicans. Shrinking their treasuries and political power by subjecting them to right-to-work strictures would only damage Republicans electoral prospects (and may well play poorly to voters).
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
$10M is just a bagatelle...Ludvig wrote several. Here is one performed by Glen Gould
Demeter
Dec 2012
#2
As it's nearly midnight, and the news is viciously depressing, I shall return in the morning
Demeter
Dec 2012
#3
Picking Up a $170 Billion Tab: How US Taxpayers Are Paying the Pentagon to Occupy the Planet
Demeter
Dec 2012
#9
How Michigan Republicans Caught Labor Off-Guard, Making Law Worse than Wisconsin's
Demeter
Dec 2012
#20
Not Just Union-Busting: 5 Other Terrible Things Michigan Republicans Did in the Lame Duck
Demeter
Dec 2012
#21
10 Best Countries In Which To Be Born in 2013 (Hint: America Isn't One Of Them)
Demeter
Dec 2012
#23
What do the Budget Thugs Trying to Gut the Safety Net Really Know About the Economy? By Dean Baker
Demeter
Dec 2012
#37
US Government’s Foreclosure Scam Is Ignored By ‘Lamestream’ Media By Ted Newcomen
Demeter
Dec 2012
#51
Defying Gravity A gripping history of the 40 years since wealth started falling up By Dan Froomkin
Demeter
Dec 2012
#59
I am so grateful for the replies to the pro gun talking points that I am seeing on DU
kickysnana
Dec 2012
#62