Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: STOCK MARKET WATCH -- 7 June 2012 [View all]Demeter
(85,373 posts)58. Wisconsin Recap: Thanks to Obama, American Left Lies in Smoldering Wreckage By Matt Stoller
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2012/06/wisconsin-recap-thanks-to-obama-american-left-lies-in-smoldering-wreckage.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+NakedCapitalism+%28naked+capitalism%29
Matt Stoller is a fellow at the Roosevelt Institute. You can follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/matthewstoller.
********************************************************************
On Tuesday, Wisconsin Republican Governor Scott Walker humiliated his Democratic opponent, Tom Barrett, by easily turning back a popular recall attempt sponsored by unions and liberal activists. The numbers in the election, which were supposed to be close, were ugly, in favor of the Republican. But this wasnt just any Republican, Scott Walker is THE Republican, the politician who made his governorship a referendum on a hard right agenda, in a blue state. Walker waged a direct and very public attack on the major constituencies of the Democratic Party, rolling back rights for women, the working class, and the young with measures such as ending collective bargaining for state employees, privatizing state assets, and repealing Wisconsons equal pay provisions for women. His agenda provoked a fierce reaction Wisconsin citizens occupied the Statehouse for months - and then a recall. Tuesday, Walkers agenda was ratified by the voters of Wisconsin, the state where public sector unions were born. Its hard to overstate how bad this is Wisconsin is now on the road to becoming a right-to-work state, in what is likely to become a right-to-work country. Right-to-work laws are provisions that allow individual employees to withdraw from unions, and they make it much harder for unions to organize.
And the deeper you look into the race, the worse it looks. By calling for a recall instead of a general strike after Walker stripped collective bargaining rights and cut benefits for workers, labor and Democratic leadership in the state diverted and then subverted populist energy, channeling it into an electoral process (at least one union, one very active in the occupation of the Capitol, stood apart from the electoral stupidity). Then, Barrett, an anti-labor centrist, won the Democratic primary by crushing his labor-backed opponent, Kathleen Falk. Finally, Barrett himself was destroyed by Scott Walker, who outspent Barrett 7-1 with corporate money. In other words, first, liberals lost a policy battle, then they failed to strike, then they lost a primary election, then they lost a general election to the most high-profile effective reactionary policy-maker in the country. The conservative beat the moderate who beat the liberal. And had Barrett won, he wouldnt even have rolled back Walkers agenda. Somehow, in a no-win electoral situation, Democrats and labor managed to lose as badly as they possibly could.
What happened?
I wish I could say I had a new insight, but its basically the same problem Ive been writing about for years. Put simply, its that Obamas policy framework is now the policy framework of the Democratic Party, liberals, and unionism. Up and down the ticket, Democrats are operating under the shadow of the President, associated with unpopular policies that make the lives of voters worse and show government to be an incompetent, corrupt handmaiden to big business. So they keep losing. [b]It should be obvious that if you foreclose on your voters, cut their pay, and legalize theft of their wealth by Wall Street oligarchs, they wont be your voters anymore. Somehow, Democratic activists continue to operate as if policy doesnt matter to voters, or that policy evaluation is a Chinese menu of different stuff, some of which you like and some of which you dont, as in Oh Ill take a pro-choice moderate, with a bailout, and gay rights. And a Pepsi. But thats not how it works voters lives get better, or they dont. And under Obama, stuff has gotten worse. Obamas economic policies have made economic inequality sharper than it was under Bush, due to his bailout of banks and concurrent elimination of the main source of wealth of most Americans, home equity. With these policy choices, Obama destroyed the Democratic Party and liberalism under Obamas first two years, the fastest growing demographic party label was former Democrat. Liberalism demands that people pay for a government, but why should anyone want to pay taxes for the terrible governance Obama has implemented?
........................................................................................
But its not complete to say this is just Obamas doing. Obama has done everything hes done with the support of labor leaders, Democratic supportive groups like Moveon, foundations, liberal pundits, African-American church networks, feminist groups, LGBT groups, and technology interests. Any of these could have stopped him by withdrawing support and overtly attacking him, but only the LBGT community fought for their rights. This American labor bureaucracy, which simply does not strike and therefore has no leverage against capital, operates largely as a group of fragmented business unionists. Unfortunately, business unions dont exist when business decides it doesnt want unions. And thats what global business elites have decided, as this piece published on this very site titled The Liquidation of Society versus the Global Labor Revival shows.
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2011/02/matt-stoller-the-liquidation-of-society-versus-the-global-labor-revival.html
Thanks to Doug Henwood for the invaluable chart on strikes.
MUCH MORE GALL AND BRIMSTONE AT LINKS
Matt Stoller is a fellow at the Roosevelt Institute. You can follow him on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/matthewstoller.
********************************************************************
On Tuesday, Wisconsin Republican Governor Scott Walker humiliated his Democratic opponent, Tom Barrett, by easily turning back a popular recall attempt sponsored by unions and liberal activists. The numbers in the election, which were supposed to be close, were ugly, in favor of the Republican. But this wasnt just any Republican, Scott Walker is THE Republican, the politician who made his governorship a referendum on a hard right agenda, in a blue state. Walker waged a direct and very public attack on the major constituencies of the Democratic Party, rolling back rights for women, the working class, and the young with measures such as ending collective bargaining for state employees, privatizing state assets, and repealing Wisconsons equal pay provisions for women. His agenda provoked a fierce reaction Wisconsin citizens occupied the Statehouse for months - and then a recall. Tuesday, Walkers agenda was ratified by the voters of Wisconsin, the state where public sector unions were born. Its hard to overstate how bad this is Wisconsin is now on the road to becoming a right-to-work state, in what is likely to become a right-to-work country. Right-to-work laws are provisions that allow individual employees to withdraw from unions, and they make it much harder for unions to organize.
And the deeper you look into the race, the worse it looks. By calling for a recall instead of a general strike after Walker stripped collective bargaining rights and cut benefits for workers, labor and Democratic leadership in the state diverted and then subverted populist energy, channeling it into an electoral process (at least one union, one very active in the occupation of the Capitol, stood apart from the electoral stupidity). Then, Barrett, an anti-labor centrist, won the Democratic primary by crushing his labor-backed opponent, Kathleen Falk. Finally, Barrett himself was destroyed by Scott Walker, who outspent Barrett 7-1 with corporate money. In other words, first, liberals lost a policy battle, then they failed to strike, then they lost a primary election, then they lost a general election to the most high-profile effective reactionary policy-maker in the country. The conservative beat the moderate who beat the liberal. And had Barrett won, he wouldnt even have rolled back Walkers agenda. Somehow, in a no-win electoral situation, Democrats and labor managed to lose as badly as they possibly could.
What happened?
I wish I could say I had a new insight, but its basically the same problem Ive been writing about for years. Put simply, its that Obamas policy framework is now the policy framework of the Democratic Party, liberals, and unionism. Up and down the ticket, Democrats are operating under the shadow of the President, associated with unpopular policies that make the lives of voters worse and show government to be an incompetent, corrupt handmaiden to big business. So they keep losing. [b]It should be obvious that if you foreclose on your voters, cut their pay, and legalize theft of their wealth by Wall Street oligarchs, they wont be your voters anymore. Somehow, Democratic activists continue to operate as if policy doesnt matter to voters, or that policy evaluation is a Chinese menu of different stuff, some of which you like and some of which you dont, as in Oh Ill take a pro-choice moderate, with a bailout, and gay rights. And a Pepsi. But thats not how it works voters lives get better, or they dont. And under Obama, stuff has gotten worse. Obamas economic policies have made economic inequality sharper than it was under Bush, due to his bailout of banks and concurrent elimination of the main source of wealth of most Americans, home equity. With these policy choices, Obama destroyed the Democratic Party and liberalism under Obamas first two years, the fastest growing demographic party label was former Democrat. Liberalism demands that people pay for a government, but why should anyone want to pay taxes for the terrible governance Obama has implemented?
........................................................................................
But its not complete to say this is just Obamas doing. Obama has done everything hes done with the support of labor leaders, Democratic supportive groups like Moveon, foundations, liberal pundits, African-American church networks, feminist groups, LGBT groups, and technology interests. Any of these could have stopped him by withdrawing support and overtly attacking him, but only the LBGT community fought for their rights. This American labor bureaucracy, which simply does not strike and therefore has no leverage against capital, operates largely as a group of fragmented business unionists. Unfortunately, business unions dont exist when business decides it doesnt want unions. And thats what global business elites have decided, as this piece published on this very site titled The Liquidation of Society versus the Global Labor Revival shows.
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2011/02/matt-stoller-the-liquidation-of-society-versus-the-global-labor-revival.html
Thanks to Doug Henwood for the invaluable chart on strikes.
MUCH MORE GALL AND BRIMSTONE AT LINKS
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
102 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
JP Morgan Under OCC Investigation for Serious Debt Collection Abuses; Warnings Ignored for 2 years
Demeter
Jun 2012
#28
See, this is what happens when you push all the smart people out and let the Greeks take over. n/t
Egalitarian Thug
Jun 2012
#75
No, the Fraternity/Sorority set. Idiots with MBA's and a spreadsheet, but no idea about the
Egalitarian Thug
Jun 2012
#97
LOL! I should have guessed. The EE and CS programs shared many classes at my college,
Egalitarian Thug
Jun 2012
#100
The film pissed me off. They made the story of Seabiscuit into a very good film, likable and
Egalitarian Thug
Jun 2012
#76
The Secretariat film was an abomination - but I didn't like Seabiscuit either
bread_and_roses
Jun 2012
#80
Secretariat was more about Chenery and her story than it was the horse and its accomplishments
Roland99
Jun 2012
#85
heh...actually, it shines a light on the dirty, physically and emotionally harmful lives they lead.
Roland99
Jun 2012
#96
Check the pockets of Angelo Mozillo, Richard Fuld, Jon Corzine, Jamie Dimon, etc
DemReadingDU
Jun 2012
#51
Guess it was Chopper Ben. He's speaking. Markets falling back to flat (NASDAQ in the red)
Roland99
Jun 2012
#56
The wealth of nations: An alternative approach to measuring national well-being
Demeter
Jun 2012
#52
Wisconsin Recap: Thanks to Obama, American Left Lies in Smoldering Wreckage By Matt Stoller
Demeter
Jun 2012
#58
Michael Olenick: How Banks and Their Lawyers Win at the Expense of Investors and Homeowners
Demeter
Jun 2012
#65
Michael Crimmins: What the Press Refuses to See in JP Morgan and MF Global Scandals
Demeter
Jun 2012
#66
No, they don't, and even less so right now as their economy is beginning to tank. n/t
Egalitarian Thug
Jun 2012
#77